If ⌈x⌉ denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x, is ⌈x⌉ = 0?
(1) -1<x<1
(2) x<0
Need help for this question.
Thanks!
DS
This topic has expert replies
- jaspreetsra
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2014 10:26 pm
- Thanked: 1 times
- MartyMurray
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2131
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:26 am
- Location: https://martymurraycoaching.com/
- Thanked: 955 times
- Followed by:140 members
- GMAT Score:800
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
Statement 1 tells us that x could be fractionally below 0, which would make ⌈x⌉ = 0. x could also be 0, which would create ⌈x⌉ = 0. x could also be fractionally above 0, which would result in ⌈x⌉ = 1. So this creates two results.jaspreetsra wrote:If ⌈x⌉ denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x, is ⌈x⌉ = 0?
(1) -1<x<1
(2) x<0
Need help for this question.
Insufficient
Statement 2 tells us that x can be any number below 0 and so ⌈x⌉ can be any integer <= 0.
Insufficient
Combined we know that the minimum is 0, from Statement 1, and the maximum is 0, from Statement 2.
Sufficient
Choose C.
Wasn't so tough. Maybe you need to have more confidence in yourself and be a little more determined to figure 'em out.
GMAT/MBA Expert
- [email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
Hi jaspreetsra,
This DS question is an example of a Symbolism question. In Symbolism questions, you'll be given a "made up" math symbol to work with and a description of how the Symbol "works." You'll then be asked to perform a calculation using the symbol.
Here, we're told that [X] is the LEAST INTEGER that is GREATER THAN OR EQUAL to X. We're asked if [X] = 0? This is a YES/NO question.
Before we get into the 2 Facts, here are some examples of how this Symbol works:
[2] = 2 since 2 is the LEAST integer that is greater than or equal to 2.
[1/2] = 1
[-2.5] = -2
Fact 1: -1 < X < 1
Here, we can TEST VALUES.
IF....
X = 0, then [0] = 0 and the answer to the question is YES.
X = 1/2, then [1/2] = 1 and the answer to the question is NO.
Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT
Fact 2: X < 0
IF...
X = -1, then [-1] = -1 and the answer to the question is NO.
X = -1/2, then [-1/2] = 0 and the answer to the question is YES.
Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT
Combined, we know that...
-1 < X < 1
X < 0
So we have a range of.....
-1 < X < 0
This means that X is a NEGATIVE FRACTION. According to the Symbol, no matter what negative fraction we use for X, the LEAST INTEGER that is greater than or equal to X will be 0 EVERY TIME. Thus, the answer to the question is ALWAYS YES.
Combined, SUFFICIENT.
Final Answer: C
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
This DS question is an example of a Symbolism question. In Symbolism questions, you'll be given a "made up" math symbol to work with and a description of how the Symbol "works." You'll then be asked to perform a calculation using the symbol.
Here, we're told that [X] is the LEAST INTEGER that is GREATER THAN OR EQUAL to X. We're asked if [X] = 0? This is a YES/NO question.
Before we get into the 2 Facts, here are some examples of how this Symbol works:
[2] = 2 since 2 is the LEAST integer that is greater than or equal to 2.
[1/2] = 1
[-2.5] = -2
Fact 1: -1 < X < 1
Here, we can TEST VALUES.
IF....
X = 0, then [0] = 0 and the answer to the question is YES.
X = 1/2, then [1/2] = 1 and the answer to the question is NO.
Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT
Fact 2: X < 0
IF...
X = -1, then [-1] = -1 and the answer to the question is NO.
X = -1/2, then [-1/2] = 0 and the answer to the question is YES.
Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT
Combined, we know that...
-1 < X < 1
X < 0
So we have a range of.....
-1 < X < 0
This means that X is a NEGATIVE FRACTION. According to the Symbol, no matter what negative fraction we use for X, the LEAST INTEGER that is greater than or equal to X will be 0 EVERY TIME. Thus, the answer to the question is ALWAYS YES.
Combined, SUFFICIENT.
Final Answer: C
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
Hi jaspreetsra,
Now that you've seen a couple of approaches, here are two more questions to practice with:
- https://www.beatthegmat.com/ds-t276593.html
- https://www.beatthegmat.com/number-prope ... 71768.html
Cheers,
Brent
Now that you've seen a couple of approaches, here are two more questions to practice with:
- https://www.beatthegmat.com/ds-t276593.html
- https://www.beatthegmat.com/number-prope ... 71768.html
Cheers,
Brent
GMAT/MBA Expert
- ceilidh.erickson
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pm
- Thanked: 1443 times
- Followed by:247 members
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
The constructions "least integer greater than or equal to x" and "greatest integer less than or equal to x" are quite common on the GMAT. The key is to translate these into common English:
"[x] is the least integer greater than or equal to x" --> if x is an integer, then [x] just equals x itself. If x is a non-integer, then we ROUND UP to the nearest integer: [2.3] = 3
"[x] is the greatest integer less than or equal to x" --> if x is an integer, then [x] again just equals x itself. If x is a non-integer, then we ROUND DOWN to the nearest integer: [2.3] = 2
In OG13, see PS 156 and DS 104. And see this post: https://www.beatthegmat.com/ds-t276593.html#719492
"[x] is the least integer greater than or equal to x" --> if x is an integer, then [x] just equals x itself. If x is a non-integer, then we ROUND UP to the nearest integer: [2.3] = 3
"[x] is the greatest integer less than or equal to x" --> if x is an integer, then [x] again just equals x itself. If x is a non-integer, then we ROUND DOWN to the nearest integer: [2.3] = 2
In OG13, see PS 156 and DS 104. And see this post: https://www.beatthegmat.com/ds-t276593.html#719492
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education