Manhattan CAT DS Number Line Positive

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 16
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2013 11:20 am
Location: Appleton, WI
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:3 members
Is the number x positive?

(1) On the number line, 0 is closer to x - 1 than to x.
(2) On the number line, 0 is closer to x than to x + 1.

The answer I find a bit confusing. Please answer and explain. I am confused by the description they gave.

OA A

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2131
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:26 am
Location: https://martymurraycoaching.com/
Thanked: 955 times
Followed by:140 members
GMAT Score:800

by MartyMurray » Mon Nov 24, 2014 4:33 pm
marshelle.slayton wrote:Is the number x positive?

(1) On the number line, 0 is closer to x - 1 than to x.
(2) On the number line, 0 is closer to x than to x + 1.

The answer I find a bit confusing. Please answer and explain. I am confused by the description they gave.

OA A
Statement 1 says that 0 is closer to x - 1 than it is to x.

We can start by ruling out that x is negative. If x were negative, then x - 1 would be further from 0 than x is.

Next, from Statement 1 we can tell that x is not 0. If x were 0, 0 would be closer to x than it is to x - 1.

Finally, from Statement 1 x can be positive. If subtracting 1 from a number makes it closer to 0, that number is postive. So Statemment 1 is sufficient.

Now look at Statement 2.

x could be 0, and then 0 would be closer to x than to x + 1. Also x could be positive, in which case 0 would still be closer to x than it is to x + 1.

So Statement 2 is insufficient.

Choose A.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Nov 24, 2014 4:57 pm
Is the number x positive?

(1) On the number line, 0 is closer to x - 1 than to x.
(2) On the number line, 0 is closer to x than to x + 1.
|x| = the distance between 0 and x.
|x-y| = the distance between 0 and x-y.
|x+y| = the distance between 0 and x+y.

Statement 1: On the number line, 0 is closer to x - 1 than to x.
|x-1| < |x|.
Since there is absolute value notation on each side, we can square the inequality.
(x-1)² < x²
x² - 2x + 1 < x²
-2x < -1
x > 1/2.
Thus, x must be positive.
SUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: On the number line, 0 is closer to x than to x + 1.
|x| < |x+1|.
Since there is absolute value notation on each side, we can square the inequality.
x² < (x+1)²
x² < x² + 2x + 1
-2x < 1
x > -1/2.
Thus, x could be negative or positive.
INSUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is A.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
Elite Legendary Member
Posts: 10392
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Thanked: 2867 times
Followed by:511 members
GMAT Score:800

by [email protected] » Mon Nov 24, 2014 5:24 pm
Hi marshelle.slayton,

For this DS question, you'll find it pretty easy to TEST values:

We're asked if x is positive? This is a YES/NO question. We don't know anything about x to start.

For this question you'll find that drawing a picture might be helpful; Number Properties will also make this question a bit easier to handle. Remember what the question's asking for though: Is x positive?

If x > 0 then the answer is YES
If x = 0 then the answer is NO
If x < 0 then the answer is NO

Fact 1 tells us that 0 is closer to (x - 1) than to x.

Here, consider the possibilities...
Could x = 0??? Is 0 closer to -1 than to 0?
No, it's not, so x CANNOT = 0

Could x = a negative?
Try x = -1
Is 0 closer to -2 than to -1
No, it's not, so x CANNOT = a negative

If x CANNOT = 0 and x CANNOT = a negative, then all that's left are positives!!!!
So x MUST be positive and the answer to the question is ALWAYS YES.
Fact 1 is SUFFICIENT

Fact 2 tells us that 0 is closer to x than to (x+1)

Let's consider the possibilities here:

Could x = 0???
0 is closer to 0 than to 1, so 0 IS POSSIBLE and the answer to the question is NO.

Could x = 1???
0 is closer to 1 than to 2, so 1 IS POSSIBLE and the answer to the question is YES.
These results are inconsistent.
Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT

Final Answer: A

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image

User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 16
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2013 11:20 am
Location: Appleton, WI
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:3 members

by marshelle.slayton » Tue Nov 25, 2014 5:52 am
All thanks for the help. During my practice test I did plug answers in and reach the same conclusion but when I plugged fractions in, it didn't work out so well.

If you try x=1/3 the first statement is no longer sufficient. 0 < |1/3| < |(1/3)-1| C would be closer to 1/3 than -2/3.

No where in the prompt did it describe if X had to be an integer. Can someone please explain why the OA is still A?

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Nov 25, 2014 8:05 am
marshelle.slayton wrote:All thanks for the help. During my practice test I did plug answers in and reach the same conclusion but when I plugged fractions in, it didn't work out so well.

If you try x=1/3 the first statement is no longer sufficient. 0 < |1/3| < |(1/3)-1| C would be closer to 1/3 than -2/3.

No where in the prompt did it describe if X had to be an integer. Can someone please explain why the OA is still A?
When we evaluate statement 1, we may consider only values that SATISFY statement 1.

Statement 1: On the number line, 0 is closer to x - 1 than to x.
x=1/3 does not satisfy this constraint, since 0 is NOT closer to x-1 = -2/3 than to x = 1/3.
Thus, we may not consider x=1/3 when we evaluate statement 1.

As I noted in my solution above, only values greater than 1/2 will satisfy statement 1.
x=3/4 works, since 0 is closer to x-1 = -1/4 than to x=3/4.
x=1 works, since 0 is closer to x-1 = 0 than to x=1.
x=10 works, since 0 is closer to x-1 = 9 than to x=10.
Since statement 1 is satisfied only by values greater than 1/2, we know that x must be POSITIVE.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2131
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:26 am
Location: https://martymurraycoaching.com/
Thanked: 955 times
Followed by:140 members
GMAT Score:800

by MartyMurray » Tue Nov 25, 2014 4:30 pm
There you have it Marshelle. Mitch laid it out well.

To get that high score, be clear about what you did to get that wrong answer.

I was tempted to do the same thing you did on this one.

Much of maximizing a GMAT score is about getting problems right.

This one for instance, used very simple concepts, and yet is still a little tricky. You certainly don't need to dredge up some arcane math concept to answer the question. You just need to get it right.

So to maximize your score it would probably help to see exactly what you did here and seek not to do that in the future, and if you do do something similar on another problem, to be aware of that and seek to change whatever it is that underlies that pattern.

User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 16
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2013 11:20 am
Location: Appleton, WI
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:3 members

by marshelle.slayton » Wed Nov 26, 2014 11:36 am
Oh that makes more sense! I was making it to complicated and forgot that the statement defined the set!

Thanks for your help guys!