This week, we're tackling the GMAT math through a question that a student brought up. At first, the problem seems like a plug-and-chug kind of problem. But with the help of a crucial insight, this problem can be solved much quicker! Watch the video to find out what that insight is.
- See more at: https://magoosh.com/gmat/2014/gmat-tuesd ... o-prime-2/
GMAT Tuesdays: Co-Prime
This topic has expert replies
GMAT/MBA Expert
- KevinRocci
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 3:17 pm
- Location: Berkeley, Ca
- Thanked: 30 times
- Followed by:21 members
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 447
- Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 7:25 am
- Thanked: 25 times
- Followed by:1 members
Nice uncomplicated approach.
However, even if you didn't know (or understand) this co-prime law, you could consider this:
xyz is definitely a multiple of all three variables. To add only one more to it (xyz + 1) could never give you any common multiple, because the next common multiple must be more than 1 more.
Let's look at x for example:
xyz + 1 = x(yz +1/x)
This can never be a multiple of x because 1/x = 1/prime < 1 (i.e. non integer)
(yz + 1/x) is not a factor
The same argument can be made for each of the other variables too.
Upon a brief inspection, this can be answered in under 5 seconds.
Hence The answer is clearly xyz+1, without even looking at any other options.
However, even if you didn't know (or understand) this co-prime law, you could consider this:
xyz is definitely a multiple of all three variables. To add only one more to it (xyz + 1) could never give you any common multiple, because the next common multiple must be more than 1 more.
Let's look at x for example:
xyz + 1 = x(yz +1/x)
This can never be a multiple of x because 1/x = 1/prime < 1 (i.e. non integer)
(yz + 1/x) is not a factor
The same argument can be made for each of the other variables too.
Upon a brief inspection, this can be answered in under 5 seconds.
Hence The answer is clearly xyz+1, without even looking at any other options.