marriage and divorse

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 774
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2012 4:32 am
Thanked: 46 times
Followed by:14 members

marriage and divorse

by aditya8062 » Mon Mar 04, 2013 9:23 pm
good day guru
i have attached a file
in the the following question i have the following doubt :while i do agree that E is a perfect answer here but plz tell me what if option A were : the number of marriages has decreased since 1940
will that make A a contender
as per me : i somehow felt that if A were as i have mentioned above then it will give me alternate reason as why this ratio (divorce to marriage) has increased and hence it will weaken that allegation .kindly correct me if i am wrong
thanks and regards
aditya
Image

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Wed Mar 06, 2013 8:16 am
No, changing answer choice A to "The number of marriages has decreased since 1940" would not weaken the argument, since the question concerns the ratio of marriages to divorces.
For example, consider this scenario:

Let's say that divorce is the only cause of single parenthood. And let's say, every married couple has 1 child.
1940: 100 marriages, 10 divorces. So, 10% of the children have 1 parent
Today: 20 marriages, 5 divorces. So, 25% of the children have 1 parent

So, even though the number of marriages has decreased, the proportion of 1-parent children has still increased.

For this argument, the big assumption is that divorce is the only cause of single parenthood.
Answer choice E suggests another cause.

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

Legendary Member
Posts: 774
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2012 4:32 am
Thanked: 46 times
Followed by:14 members

by aditya8062 » Wed Mar 06, 2013 8:34 am
To
Brent@GMATPrepNow
good day
thanks for ur reply but i feel there is something wrong in ur text
i quote u :
No, changing answer choice A to "The number of marriages has decreased since 1940" would not weaken the argument, since the question concerns the ratio of marriages to divorces.
the ratio concerned is of divorce to marriage and not vice a versa
my whole point was if number of marriages are reduced then also this ratio will increase and hence it might not be the case that number of divorce have increased as have been alleged by the argument
after all what the argument is alleging ? it is saying that proportion of single parent children has increased .what is the evidence ? the ratio of divorce to marriage has increased .so what is the assumption ? that number of divorce has increased .
so by saying that number of marriage has reduced i am basically providing an alternate reasoning

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Wed Mar 06, 2013 8:43 am
aditya8062 wrote:
the ratio concerned is of divorce to marriage and not vice a versa
my whole point was if number of marriages are reduced then also this ratio will increase and hence it might not be the case that number of divorce have increased as have been alleged by the argument
The argument is not suggesting anything about the number of divorces (or the number of marriages for that matter).
This argument is all about ratios and proportions.
The conclusion is that the proportion of children with 1 parent has increased. It is not suggesting that the number of children with 1 parent has increased.

Perhaps I'm not understanding your point.

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2013 8:33 pm

by jessyjohn » Thu Apr 18, 2013 8:35 pm
Being in love and getting married are two very different things. Relationships can be as easy and as hard as any couple would want them to be. wedding planner courses

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 341
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 6:59 pm
Thanked: 17 times
Followed by:4 members
GMAT Score:720

by ice_rush » Fri Apr 19, 2013 10:02 am
What is the source of this problem?


thanks!

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Fri Apr 19, 2013 10:11 am
ice_rush wrote:What is the source of this problem?


thanks!
The husband!! :-)
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 341
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 6:59 pm
Thanked: 17 times
Followed by:4 members
GMAT Score:720

by ice_rush » Fri Apr 19, 2013 12:58 pm
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
ice_rush wrote:What is the source of this problem?


thanks!
The husband!! :-)

haha...Brent, that was really funny!

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 33
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 10:02 am

by AdvenofTintin » Sat Apr 20, 2013 6:54 am
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
ice_rush wrote:What is the source of this problem?


thanks!
The husband!! :-)
:)

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2014 12:38 am

by adelie_40 » Wed Aug 06, 2014 12:39 am
 I have selected restaurant for my wedding ceremonies which are wonderful in every aspect. The best thing I liked about them is their services and the way they treat their clients with a big smile on their face.
Last edited by adelie_40 on Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:36 am, edited 1 time in total.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2014 8:08 am
Thanked: 1 times

by davidson333 » Tue Aug 12, 2014 8:06 pm
How can to be overcome at this problem?

www.mbaapplication.net

Moderator
Posts: 426
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2017 8:48 pm
Followed by:1 members

by BTGmoderatorAT » Sun Aug 27, 2017 8:22 am
Teen pregnancy can also contribute those children living with only one parent. They will single-handedly raise thier children without being married at young age.