Resolve The Paradox
This topic has expert replies
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 11:38 pm
- Thanked: 6 times
- Followed by:4 members
- theCodeToGMAT
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1556
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:18 pm
- Thanked: 448 times
- Followed by:34 members
- GMAT Score:650
{A} - Even though they have different options to supplement their income, they still are paying tax and contribute more than 70%...
This doesn't resolve the paradox
According to Senator, the burden on 20% wealthiest is no more than that on Modest Incomes..
If we see {E}... the 20% wealthiest are getting back 75% of the tax they pay.. Although this answer choice is better than other, but doesn't give full proof of Senator's Claim.
However, in CR we select the best answer choice.. so {E}
This doesn't resolve the paradox
According to Senator, the burden on 20% wealthiest is no more than that on Modest Incomes..
If we see {E}... the 20% wealthiest are getting back 75% of the tax they pay.. Although this answer choice is better than other, but doesn't give full proof of Senator's Claim.
However, in CR we select the best answer choice.. so {E}
R A H U L
GMAT/MBA Expert
- ceilidh.erickson
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pm
- Thanked: 1443 times
- Followed by:247 members
When we're asked to resolve a paradox or discrepancy, we need to establish three things:
1) What are the given premises?
2) What would the expected outcome be?
3) How does the actual outcome differ from the expected outcome?
In this case,
1) Given: the wealthiest 20% contribute more than 70% of tax revenue
2) Expected (Congressperson's position): the wealthiest 20% has an unjust burden placed on them
3) Actual (Senator's position): the tax system does not impose a greater hardship on the wealthiest 20%
Whenever you're asked to resolve a discrepancy with mathematical language, think about mathematical METRICS. If everyone made exactly the same amount of money, 20% of people should pay 20% of taxes. If the wealthiest people make significantly more money than other people, they could pay a lot more money in taxes (accounting for a larger percentage of the total pool of tax revenue), without necessarily paying a larger proportion of their income in taxes than anyone else does.
We're looking at two different proportions here: the proportion of the total pool of tax revenue v. proportion of each person's income. To resolve the apparent paradox, we need to say that the taxes from these 20% make up a 70% portion of all tax revenue, but that these people do not pay taxes at a higher rate (a greater proportion of their income) than anyone else.
A. Supplemented income does not answer the question of whether they are taxed at a higher rate.
B. Ability to pay taxes does not address whether they are taxed unfairly.
C. The tiered rate could give a much higher rate to the wealthy, supporting the Congressperson's claim.
D. The argument only talks about income tax revenue. Irrelevant.
E. If the wealthiest earn 75% of income but only pay 70% of income taxes, they are actually taxed at a lower rate than the total population, and thus do NOT have an unjust burden placed on them. Correct.
The answer is E.
1) What are the given premises?
2) What would the expected outcome be?
3) How does the actual outcome differ from the expected outcome?
In this case,
1) Given: the wealthiest 20% contribute more than 70% of tax revenue
2) Expected (Congressperson's position): the wealthiest 20% has an unjust burden placed on them
3) Actual (Senator's position): the tax system does not impose a greater hardship on the wealthiest 20%
Whenever you're asked to resolve a discrepancy with mathematical language, think about mathematical METRICS. If everyone made exactly the same amount of money, 20% of people should pay 20% of taxes. If the wealthiest people make significantly more money than other people, they could pay a lot more money in taxes (accounting for a larger percentage of the total pool of tax revenue), without necessarily paying a larger proportion of their income in taxes than anyone else does.
We're looking at two different proportions here: the proportion of the total pool of tax revenue v. proportion of each person's income. To resolve the apparent paradox, we need to say that the taxes from these 20% make up a 70% portion of all tax revenue, but that these people do not pay taxes at a higher rate (a greater proportion of their income) than anyone else.
A. Supplemented income does not answer the question of whether they are taxed at a higher rate.
B. Ability to pay taxes does not address whether they are taxed unfairly.
C. The tiered rate could give a much higher rate to the wealthy, supporting the Congressperson's claim.
D. The argument only talks about income tax revenue. Irrelevant.
E. If the wealthiest earn 75% of income but only pay 70% of income taxes, they are actually taxed at a lower rate than the total population, and thus do NOT have an unjust burden placed on them. Correct.
The answer is E.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education