An economic recession can result from a lowering of employment rates triggered by a drop in investment, which causes people to cut consumer spending and starts a cycle of layoffs leading back to even lower employment rates.
A) a lowering of employment rates triggered by a drop in investment, which causes people to cut consumer spending and start a cycle of layoffs leading back to even lower employment rates.
B) a lowering of employment rates triggered by dropping investment, which causes people to cut consumer spending and starts a cycle of layoffs leading back to even lower employment rates.
C) falling employment rates triggered by a drop in investment, which cause cutbacks in consumer spending, starting a cycle of layoffs that lead to even lower employment rates.
D) falling employment rates that are triggered by a drop in investment, causing people to cut consumer spending and starting a cycle of layoffs that lead back to even lower employment rates.
E) falling employment rates that are triggered by a drop in investment, causing cutbacks in consumer spending and starting a cycle of layoffs leading to even lower employment rates.
OA : C
Brutal SC #35
This topic has expert replies
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2014 3:55 am
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2014 10:05 am
- Thanked: 2 times
GMAT/MBA Expert
- [email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi ajaysingh24,
Answer D includes some redundancies; by definition, a redundancy is unnecessary and is considered bad grammar.
Here are the redundant elements:
"falling underemployment rates THAT are triggered.....causing PEOPLE to cut consumer spending....layoffs that lead BACK to even lower...."
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Answer D includes some redundancies; by definition, a redundancy is unnecessary and is considered bad grammar.
Here are the redundant elements:
"falling underemployment rates THAT are triggered.....causing PEOPLE to cut consumer spending....layoffs that lead BACK to even lower...."
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2012 4:32 am
- Thanked: 46 times
- Followed by:14 members
hi rich
the question as it stands now can never have C as an answer
"which" in C has some serious problems
i feel that E is much better in given options
the question as it stands now can never have C as an answer
"which" in C has some serious problems
i feel that E is much better in given options
GMAT/MBA Expert
- ceilidh.erickson
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pm
- Thanked: 1443 times
- Followed by:247 members
The differences between answer choices are subtle, and many come down to MEANING rather than grammar.
"a lowering of employment rates" implies that someone intentionally lowered them. This doesn't make sense - only "falling employment rates" makes sense. Eliminate A and B.
"causing people to cut consumer spending" also doesn't make sense. People can cut back on spending, but this phrasing makes it sound like an intentional choice to cut, rather than a result of some other cause. Eliminate D.
C versus E is a difficult split (and more hair-splitting than you're likely to see on the real GMAT).
aditya8062, be careful:
Here is the basket of apples, which is heavier than I expected.
Here, the "which" is modifying "basket," not "apples."
In C, we're hopping over then entire phrase "triggered by..." to modify "rates." Stylistically this isn't great (the GMAT would rarely allow a "which" to hop quite so far), but technically it's not grammatically incorrect.
In E, the cause-effect structure is slightly reversed. The meaning of the sentence is that falling employment rates (which cause spending drops and layoffs) cause economic recessions.
In E, by using the adverbial modifiers "causing" and "starting," it implies that the "causing and starting" are the RESULTS of the clause "a recession can result from..." rather than the CAUSE. Adverbial modifiers often show cause/effect relationships:
I tripped, falling on my face.
So, there are several reasons (besides concision, which is rarely a deciding factor) that C is the more correct answer (though not necessarily a great one).
"a lowering of employment rates" implies that someone intentionally lowered them. This doesn't make sense - only "falling employment rates" makes sense. Eliminate A and B.
"causing people to cut consumer spending" also doesn't make sense. People can cut back on spending, but this phrasing makes it sound like an intentional choice to cut, rather than a result of some other cause. Eliminate D.
C versus E is a difficult split (and more hair-splitting than you're likely to see on the real GMAT).
aditya8062, be careful:
This is not strictly true. A clause beginning with "which" should modify the noun directly before it... with one exception. A "which" is allowed to hop over an essential modifier (such as a prepositional phrase or a past participle) to modify the noun that comes before that. For example:the question as it stands now can never have C as an answer
"which" in C has some serious problems
Here is the basket of apples, which is heavier than I expected.
Here, the "which" is modifying "basket," not "apples."
In C, we're hopping over then entire phrase "triggered by..." to modify "rates." Stylistically this isn't great (the GMAT would rarely allow a "which" to hop quite so far), but technically it's not grammatically incorrect.
In E, the cause-effect structure is slightly reversed. The meaning of the sentence is that falling employment rates (which cause spending drops and layoffs) cause economic recessions.
In E, by using the adverbial modifiers "causing" and "starting," it implies that the "causing and starting" are the RESULTS of the clause "a recession can result from..." rather than the CAUSE. Adverbial modifiers often show cause/effect relationships:
I tripped, falling on my face.
So, there are several reasons (besides concision, which is rarely a deciding factor) that C is the more correct answer (though not necessarily a great one).
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
GMAT/MBA Expert
- ceilidh.erickson
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pm
- Thanked: 1443 times
- Followed by:247 members
For a more GMAT-like use of the hopping-which rule, see:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/emily-dickin ... tml#563839
https://www.beatthegmat.com/emily-dickin ... tml#563839
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2012 4:32 am
- Thanked: 46 times
- Followed by:14 members
Ceilidh ,with all due respect to u ,i somehow feel that this interpretation is not right .i have read a post of Stacey koprince and RON in which they have specifically told that comma +verbing modifiers modify the previous clause (and not necessarily the previous main clause)ceilidh.erickson :In E, the cause-effect structure is slightly reversed. The meaning of the sentence is that falling employment rates (which cause spending drops and layoffs) cause economic recessions.
In E, by using the adverbial modifiers "causing" and "starting," it implies that the "causing and starting" are the RESULTS of the clause "a recession can result from..." rather than the CAUSE. Adverbial modifiers often show cause/effect relationships:
so in option E :An economic recession can result from falling employment rates that are triggered by a drop in investment, causing cutbacks in consumer spending and starting a cycle of layoffs leading to even lower employment rates.
the "causing cutbacks in consumer spending and starting a cycle of layoffs leading to even lower employment rates" will modify the subject "falling employment rates" plus the "that" clause and not "An economic recession can result"
kindly tell me if this new interpretation would make E a better answer
thanks and regards
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2012 4:32 am
- Thanked: 46 times
- Followed by:14 members
thanks ceilidh .i agree that "which" modifier can hop through a prepositional phrase but can u please guide me to some official problem where "which" hops through "participle phrases"ceilidh.erickson :A "which" is allowed to hop over an essential modifier (such as a prepositional phrase or a past participle) to modify the noun that comes before that. For example:
thanks and regards