I have read that so X that Y/ so X as to Y are correct constructions!
But the following example keeps so x. Am I missing something?
OAE
so..
This topic has expert replies
- [email protected]
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 4:02 am
- Thanked: 3 times
- Followed by:4 members
GMAT/MBA Expert
- [email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi mukherjee.tanuj3,
The word "so" can appear in a "2-part" phrase as you've noted. Here though, the word "so" is used for emphasis (similar to the word "very").
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
The word "so" can appear in a "2-part" phrase as you've noted. Here though, the word "so" is used for emphasis (similar to the word "very").
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2012 4:32 am
- Thanked: 46 times
- Followed by:14 members
here the construction is used in the sense "so X that Y" .its just that the construction has been reversed . we can read the sentence as --->the river has become so polluted that the project must be abandonedThe word "so" can appear in a "2-part" phrase as you've noted. Here though, the word "so" is used for emphasis (similar to the word "very").