What is the probability that a 3-digit positive integer picked at random will have one or more "7" in its digits?
(A) 271/900
(B) 27/100
(C) 7/25
(D) 1/9
(E) 1/10
OA is C
help
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
well, the opposite of "one or more 7's" is "no 7"s. do you know how to find the probability of that?
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
- macattack
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:55 pm
- Thanked: 11 times
- Followed by:1 members
Experts please what is wrong with this reasonning:
Total number of 3 digit numbers = 999-100+1=900
Desired outcome: 107,117,127,137...
Total number of desired outcome=252
252/900= 7/25
Total number of 3 digit numbers = 999-100+1=900
Desired outcome: 107,117,127,137...
Total number of desired outcome=252
252/900= 7/25
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 512
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:31 pm
- Thanked: 42 times
- Followed by:20 members
yes Ron i Know
Probability of getting one or more 7 = 1- (probability of No 7's)
Thankyou i got it
Probability of getting one or more 7 = 1- (probability of No 7's)
Thankyou i got it
Work hard in Silence, Let Success make the noise.
If you found my Post really helpful, then don't forget to click the Thank/follow me button.
If you found my Post really helpful, then don't forget to click the Thank/follow me button.
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
[---]
Last edited by lunarpower on Tue Aug 06, 2013 3:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
- macattack
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:55 pm
- Thanked: 11 times
- Followed by:1 members
100s: 19 desired outcome (107,127,137,147,157,167,170,171,172...)
200s: 19 desired outcome
300s: 19 desired outcome
400s: 19 desired outcome
500s: 19 desired outcome
600s: 19 desired outcome
800s: 19 desired outcome
900s: 19 desired outcome
700s: 100 desired outocme
Total number of desired outcome= 100+19*8=252
200s: 19 desired outcome
300s: 19 desired outcome
400s: 19 desired outcome
500s: 19 desired outcome
600s: 19 desired outcome
800s: 19 desired outcome
900s: 19 desired outcome
700s: 100 desired outocme
Total number of desired outcome= 100+19*8=252
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
macattack -- yeah, you're right here. nice work.
as usual, i misread the problem (yay! dyslexia is fun) as "three-digit code" instead of "three-digit number". so, in other words, i was thinking about 000-999 instead of 100-999.
so, yes, that works.
using the "opposite situation" method:
the chance of getting NO sevens is
(8/9)(9/10)(9/10)
= (8/10)(9/10)
= 72/100
= 18/25
so, the chance of getting at least one seven is 1 - 18/25 = 7/25.
--
you can also do this:
* 90 numbers with "7" in the units place (107, 117, ..., 997); 90 numbers with "7" in the tens place (170, 171, ..., 979), and 100 numbers with "7" in the hundreds place (700-799) ... so, 280.
BUT
* we've counted all the _77 numbers except 777 (eight of them) twice. there are eight of those, so subtract 8.
* we've counted all the 7_7 numbers except 777 (nine of them) twice. there are nine of those, so subtract 9.
* we've counted all the 77_ numbers except 777 (nine of them) twice. there are nine of those, so subtract 9.
so, right now, 254.
FINALLY
* we've counted 777 three times. so, subtract two of them (so that one still counts), leaving 252.
... but your way of counting seems to be more straightforward.
as usual, i misread the problem (yay! dyslexia is fun) as "three-digit code" instead of "three-digit number". so, in other words, i was thinking about 000-999 instead of 100-999.
so, yes, that works.
using the "opposite situation" method:
the chance of getting NO sevens is
(8/9)(9/10)(9/10)
= (8/10)(9/10)
= 72/100
= 18/25
so, the chance of getting at least one seven is 1 - 18/25 = 7/25.
--
you can also do this:
* 90 numbers with "7" in the units place (107, 117, ..., 997); 90 numbers with "7" in the tens place (170, 171, ..., 979), and 100 numbers with "7" in the hundreds place (700-799) ... so, 280.
BUT
* we've counted all the _77 numbers except 777 (eight of them) twice. there are eight of those, so subtract 8.
* we've counted all the 7_7 numbers except 777 (nine of them) twice. there are nine of those, so subtract 9.
* we've counted all the 77_ numbers except 777 (nine of them) twice. there are nine of those, so subtract 9.
so, right now, 254.
FINALLY
* we've counted 777 three times. so, subtract two of them (so that one still counts), leaving 252.
... but your way of counting seems to be more straightforward.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
Ya, if the "oa" doesn't say 7/25, then it's wrong.macattack wrote:So the OA is wrong? Hah I am starting to enjoy that whole GMAT ride!
What does it say?
I'm posting from a tablet, so I can't see behind the cursed blackout thingy.
This is why you should stick with problems from known sources, folks.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
final score...macattack wrote:its says 271/900
you: 1
"oa": 0
what's the source?
regard with suspicion from now on...
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 512
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:31 pm
- Thanked: 42 times
- Followed by:20 members
Ahhh thank you for telling me that the Official answer posted is wrong. i was trying this question since last many hours but couldnt find that how the author reach at 271/900.
Source: initially i took this from BTG Library but later i found that this question was from gmat club tests.
Source: initially i took this from BTG Library but later i found that this question was from gmat club tests.
Work hard in Silence, Let Success make the noise.
If you found my Post really helpful, then don't forget to click the Thank/follow me button.
If you found my Post really helpful, then don't forget to click the Thank/follow me button.
GMAT/MBA Expert
- [email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi All,
The error in the "correct answer" is that the author of this question considers 3-digit numbers that begin with 0.
For example, this author considers 007 to be one of the 3-digit numbers that has a 7 in it. If you consider those additional terms, you'd find another 19 3-digit numbers with a 7 in them.
eg 007, 072, etc.
Thankfully, the GMAT writers have a rigorous writing, vetting and testing phase, so this type of error rarely ever happens.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
The error in the "correct answer" is that the author of this question considers 3-digit numbers that begin with 0.
For example, this author considers 007 to be one of the 3-digit numbers that has a 7 in it. If you consider those additional terms, you'd find another 19 3-digit numbers with a 7 in them.
eg 007, 072, etc.
Thankfully, the GMAT writers have a rigorous writing, vetting and testing phase, so this type of error rarely ever happens.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
- macattack
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:55 pm
- Thanked: 11 times
- Followed by:1 members
Hi Rich,
I don't think that is the case!
It is true that if 3digit numbers starting with 0 are to be considered that the total number of desired outcomes would become 271 like stated in the correct answer. However the denominator would change to 1000 instead of the proposed 900. So if what you are saying is true the correct answer should be 271/1000 and not 271/900.
Regards
I don't think that is the case!
It is true that if 3digit numbers starting with 0 are to be considered that the total number of desired outcomes would become 271 like stated in the correct answer. However the denominator would change to 1000 instead of the proposed 900. So if what you are saying is true the correct answer should be 271/1000 and not 271/900.
Regards
GMAT/MBA Expert
- [email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
HI macattack,
You are correct; the denominator WOULD change. So there are TWO errors in this question (the one I pointed out and the one you pointed out).
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
You are correct; the denominator WOULD change. So there are TWO errors in this question (the one I pointed out and the one you pointed out).
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich