Is r/s a terminated decimal ?
1. r is a factor of 100
2. s is a factor of 100
Terminated decimal
This topic has expert replies
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
Aside: A terminating decimal is one that does not repeat.veenu08 wrote:Is r/s a terminated decimal?
1. r is a factor of 100
2. s is a factor of 100
For example, 1/4 = 0.25 so this is a terminating decimal.
Conversely, 1/3 = 0.333333.... so this is a non-terminating decimal
Target question: Is r/s a terminating decimal?
Statement 1: r is a factor of 100
There are several pairs of values that meet this condition. Here are two:
Case a: r = 1 and s = 4, in which case r/s is a terminating decimal
Case b: r = 1 and s = 3, in which case r/s is not a terminating decimal
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT
Statement 2: s is a factor of 100
There's a nice rule that says something like,
If the prime factorization of the denominator contains only 2's and/or 5's, then the decimal version of the fraction will be a terminating decimal.
Since 100 = 2x2x5x5, any factor of 100 will contain only 2's and/or 5's (or the denominator can be 1, in which case the decimal will definitely terminate).
Since the denominator of r/s must contain only 2's and/or 5's, r/s must be a terminating decimal
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT
Answer = B
Cheers,
Brent
Last edited by Brent@GMATPrepNow on Mon Oct 24, 2016 6:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
A TERMINATING decimal has a FINITE NUMBER OF DIGITS:If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as a decimal with only a finite number of nonzero digits?
(1) s is a factor of 100.
(2) r is a factor of 100.
.5
.123
.8730253.
A NON-TERMINATING decimal has an INFINITE NUMBER OF DIGITS:
.33333....
.121212....
.871871871...
To determine whether a fraction will yield a terminating decimal:
1. Put the fraction in its MOST REDUCED FORM.
2. PRIME-FACTORIZE the denominator.
If the prime-factorization of the denominator includes ONLY 2'S AND/OR 5'S, the fraction will yield a TERMINATING decimal.
If the prime-factorization of the denominator includes ANY OTHER PRIME NUMBER, the fraction will yield a NON-TERMINATING decimal.
Case 1: 3/120
In its most reduced form, 3/120 = 1/40.
40 = 2² * 5.
Since the the prime-factorization of the denominator includes only 2's and 5's, 3/120 will yield a TERMINATING DECIMAL:
3/120 = .025
Case 2: 15/110
In its most reduced form, 15/110 = 3/22.
22 = 2*11.
Since the prime-factorization of the denominator includes 11 -- a prime number OTHER THAN 2 OR 5 -- 15/110 will yield a NON-TERMINATING DECIMAL:
15/110 = .1363636...
Onto the problem at hand.
Question rephrased: When r/s is in its most reduced form, will the prime-factorization of the denominator include only 2's and/or 5's?
Statement 1: s is a factor of 100
Since 100 = 2²5², the prime-factorization of s cannot include any prime number other than 2 and/or 5.
Thus, the value of r is IRRELEVANT:
Since the prime-factorization of s cannot include any prime number other than 2 and/or 5, the denominator of r/s in its most reduced form cannot include any prime number other than 2 and/or 5.
SUFFICIENT.
Statement 2: r is a factor of 100
No information about s.
If r=1 and s=2, then r/s = 1/2 = .5.
In this case, r/s is terminating.
If r=1 and s=3, then r/s = 1/3 = .33333...
In this case, r/s is NOT terminating.
INSUFFICIENT.
The correct answer is A.
Similar problems:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/real-number- ... 61902.html
https://www.beatthegmat.com/terminating- ... 08208.html
https://www.beatthegmat.com/terminating- ... 92476.html
Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Tue Jul 09, 2013 5:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
As you've written the question, the answer is C, as we need to know that r is an integer. (If, for example, r = 1/3 and s = any factor of 100, r/s will not terminate.)
That said, I would imagine that GMAT would tell you that r is an integer, or that r/s is expressed in reduced form (which, by convention, means that both r and s are integers), in which case the logic given above is correct. I notice that GMATGuruNY changed the prompt to add this fact to the original question, and I'd say he was right to do so.
That said, I would imagine that GMAT would tell you that r is an integer, or that r/s is expressed in reduced form (which, by convention, means that both r and s are integers), in which case the logic given above is correct. I notice that GMATGuruNY changed the prompt to add this fact to the original question, and I'd say he was right to do so.
- faraz_jeddah
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2013 9:46 am
- Location: Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- Thanked: 42 times
- Followed by:7 members
- GMAT Score:730
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
Thanks! I was wondering the same.Matt@VeritasPrep wrote:As you've written the question, the answer is C, as we need to know that r is an integer. (If, for example, r = 1/3 and s = any factor of 100, r/s will not terminate.)
That said, I would imagine that GMAT would tell you that r is an integer, or that r/s is expressed in reduced form (which, by convention, means that both r and s are integers), in which case the logic given above is correct. I notice that GMATGuruNY changed the prompt to add this fact to the original question, and I'd say he was right to do so.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:59 pm
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
Hey Brent
In this particular problem Statement 1 says r is a factor of 100
1,2,4,5,10,25,20,50 and 100 are factors of 100
Now let s be equal to 4 and let r be 100
Now we have (r/s)=100/25 =4
Next lets have s=10 and r=2 (r/s)=0.2(non recurring)
So I guess it should be insufficient because we could get an integer or we could also get a non recurring decimal.
Please clear this sir,
Thanks
In this particular problem Statement 1 says r is a factor of 100
1,2,4,5,10,25,20,50 and 100 are factors of 100
Now let s be equal to 4 and let r be 100
Now we have (r/s)=100/25 =4
Next lets have s=10 and r=2 (r/s)=0.2(non recurring)
So I guess it should be insufficient because we could get an integer or we could also get a non recurring decimal.
Please clear this sir,
Thanks
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:veenu08 wrote:If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as a decimal with only a finite number of nonzero digits?
(1) s is a factor of 100.
(2) r is a factor of 100.
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
A terminating decimal is one that does not repeat.dddanny2006 wrote:Hey Brent
In this particular problem Statement 1 says r is a factor of 100
1,2,4,5,10,25,20,50 and 100 are factors of 100
Now let s be equal to 4 and let r be 100
Now we have (r/s)=100/25 = 4
Next lets have s=10 and r=2 (r/s)=0.2(non recurring)
So I guess it should be insufficient because we could get an integer or we could also get a non recurring decimal.
For example, 1/4 = 0.25, so this is a terminating decimal.
Likewise, 6/3 = 2, so this is a terminating decimal
Conversely, 1/3 = 0.333333.... so this is a non-terminating decimal
Both of your examples result in terminating decimals.
100/25 = 4: 4 is a terminating decimal
2/10 = 0.2 : 0.2 is a terminating decimal
Cheers,
Brent
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:59 pm
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
Thanks Sir.I was of the opinion that 4 was an integer.Do we represent that 4 as 4.0?Is this the mechanism that makes it a decimal?A little confused.Because everywhere I saw something relating to terminating decimals,it was just a 1/3 or a 25/4 and other similar decimals,never did I come across an integer.
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:A terminating decimal is one that does not repeat.dddanny2006 wrote:Hey Brent
In this particular problem Statement 1 says r is a factor of 100
1,2,4,5,10,25,20,50 and 100 are factors of 100
Now let s be equal to 4 and let r be 100
Now we have (r/s)=100/25 = 4
Next lets have s=10 and r=2 (r/s)=0.2(non recurring)
So I guess it should be insufficient because we could get an integer or we could also get a non recurring decimal.
For example, 1/4 = 0.25, so this is a terminating decimal.
Likewise, 6/3 = 2, so this is a terminating decimal
Conversely, 1/3 = 0.333333.... so this is a non-terminating decimal
Both of your examples result in terminating decimals.
100/25 = 4: 4 is a terminating decimal
2/10 = 0.2 : 0.2 is a terminating decimal
Cheers,
Brent
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
A decimal is just a framework one can use to represent numbers using powers of ten (this the prefix "dec"), whereby one position represents tenths, another position represents hundredths, and so on. This framework also includes tens, hundreds and thousands.dddanny2006 wrote:Thanks Sir.I was of the opinion that 4 was an integer.Do we represent that 4 as 4.0?Is this the mechanism that makes it a decimal? A little confused. Because everywhere I saw something relating to terminating decimals, it was just a 1/3 or a 25/4 and other similar decimals,never did I come across an integer.
For this question, it really comes down to, "Can we write this number using decimal notation and be able to stop writing digits?"
So, if we convert 1/3 to decimal notation, we CANNOT STOP writing digits: 0.333333...
If we convert 1/4 to decimal notation, we CAN STOP writing digits: 0.25
Similarly, if we convert 12/4 to decimal notation, we CAN STOP writing digits: 3
For more, see page 110 of the OG13
Cheers,
Brent
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:59 pm
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
So you mean 100/25 equals 4.This 4 can be represented as 0.4 *10 to the power of 1.And this 0.4 is a terminated decimal.Is my understanding correct now?
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:A decimal is just a framework one can use to represent numbers using powers of ten (this the prefix "dec"), whereby one position represents tenths, another position represents hundredths, and so on. This framework also includes tens, hundreds and thousands.dddanny2006 wrote:Thanks Sir.I was of the opinion that 4 was an integer.Do we represent that 4 as 4.0?Is this the mechanism that makes it a decimal? A little confused. Because everywhere I saw something relating to terminating decimals, it was just a 1/3 or a 25/4 and other similar decimals,never did I come across an integer.
For this question, it really comes down to, "Can we write this number using decimal notation and be able to stop writing digits?"
So, if we convert 1/3 to decimal notation, we CANNOT STOP writing digits: 0.333333...
If we convert 1/4 to decimal notation, we CAN STOP writing digits: 0.25
Similarly, if we convert 12/4 to decimal notation, we CAN STOP writing digits: 3
For more, see page 110 of the OG13
Cheers,
Brent