| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
john1234 Rising GMAT Star
Joined: 14 May 2008 Posts: 47
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
Location: United States Target GMAT Score: 750
|
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 7:18 pm Post subject: Absolute Value!!!! |
|
|
If y is greater than or equal to 0,what is the value of x
1) lx-3l is greater than or equal to y
2) lx-3l is greater than or equal to -y
Thanx for any help _________________ Even impossible says I M possible |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
gabriel Managing Director

Joined: 20 Dec 2006 Posts: 862
Thanks given: 118 Thanked 27 times in 26 posts
Location: India
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 5:18 am Post subject: Re: Absolute Value!!!! |
|
|
| john1234 wrote: | If y is greater than or equal to 0,what is the value of x
1) lx-3l is greater than or equal to y
2) lx-3l is greater than or equal to -y
Thanx for any help |
The answer is B. The second statement says that "lx-3l is greater than or equal to -y". But since a modulus can never be negative so y has to be 0 and hence lx-3l is equal to 0 and x =3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
john1234 Rising GMAT Star
Joined: 14 May 2008 Posts: 47
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
Location: United States Target GMAT Score: 750
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 8:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks. OA is B. _________________ Even impossible says I M possible |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ravibits Just gettin' started!
Joined: 19 Aug 2007 Posts: 3
Thanks given: 2 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 10:08 pm Post subject: Re: Absolute Value!!!! |
|
|
| gabriel wrote: | | john1234 wrote: | If y is greater than or equal to 0,what is the value of x
1) lx-3l is greater than or equal to y
2) lx-3l is greater than or equal to -y
Thanx for any help |
The answer is B. The second statement says that "lx-3l is greater than or equal to -y". But since a modulus can never be negative so y has to be 0 and hence lx-3l is equal to 0 and x =3 |
I don't get it!
Since the modulus of a value can never be negative, |x-3| will always be greater than -y(which is always negative), not just for y=0.
But, the explanation above looks good for me when the condition is |x-3|<=-y and this is the case where |x-3| can take the value of 0 ONLY since -y is always zero or negative.
Please let me know if I am missing anything here... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
enniguy Just gettin' started!
Joined: 19 Jul 2008 Posts: 4
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
|
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 3:00 am Post subject: Re: Absolute Value!!!! |
|
|
| ravibits wrote: | | gabriel wrote: | | john1234 wrote: | If y is greater than or equal to 0,what is the value of x
1) lx-3l is greater than or equal to y
2) lx-3l is greater than or equal to -y
Thanx for any help |
The answer is B. The second statement says that "lx-3l is greater than or equal to -y". But since a modulus can never be negative so y has to be 0 and hence lx-3l is equal to 0 and x =3 |
I don't get it!
Since the modulus of a value can never be negative, |x-3| will always be greater than -y(which is always negative), not just for y=0.
But, the explanation above looks good for me when the condition is |x-3|<=-y and this is the case where |x-3| can take the value of 0 ONLY since -y is always zero or negative.
Please let me know if I am missing anything here... |
Look at it this way,
consider y = 2, as y >=0 from question.
2nd statement:
|x - 3| {LHS} >= -y {RHS}
Then,
|x - 3| {LHS} >= -2 {RHS}.
This means, LHS can be -1, 0, 1, 2 , ... etc.
But since LHS should always be positive or 0, RHS should also be positive or 0.
Now, RHS is -y. RHS can be 0 when y is 0.
RHS can be positive when y is negative. e.g: -(-3)
But y>=0 from question. so RHS cant be positive and y cannot be greater than 0.
So |x-3| has to be zero and hence x =3.
Hope I answered it right!
Last edited by enniguy on Thu Jul 24, 2008 7:11 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
enniguy Just gettin' started!
Joined: 19 Jul 2008 Posts: 4
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
|
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 6:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ans: E
I did not conclude in my previous explanation.
Look at it this way,
consider y = 2, as y >=0 from question.
2nd statement:
|x - 3| {LHS} >= -y {RHS}
Then,
|x - 3| {LHS} >= -2 {RHS}.
This means, LHS can be -1, 0, 1, 2 , ... etc.
But since LHS should always be positive or 0, RHS should also be positive or 0.
Now, RHS is -y. RHS can be 0 when y is 0.
RHS can be positive when y is negative. e.g: -(-3)
But y>=0 from question and y is not greater than 0 from above (RHS cant be positive and y cannot be greater than 0).
That leaves us y = 0.
This brings us to the equation,
|x-3| >= 0
Now,
|x-3| >= 0 leaves 2 cases.
Case 1:- -(x-3) >= 0 and
Case 2:- +(x-3) >= 0.
Consider, Case 1.
Step 2 : x-3 <= 0
Step 3 : x <= 3
Consider Case 2.
Step 2 : x-3 >= 0
Step 3: x >= 3
From both Case 1 and case 2,
x can be any integer.
So, Statement 2 is insufficient. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
reachac Moderator
Joined: 22 Feb 2008 Posts: 523
Thanks given: 1 Thanked 9 times in 9 posts
Test Date: 7th Aug Target GMAT Score: 770 GMAT Score: 780
|
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 10:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I am not convinced with the explanation provided for B being the answer...can anyone explain better please. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ian Stewart GMAT Instructor

Joined: 02 Jun 2008 Posts: 862
Thanks given: 2 Thanked 166 times in 153 posts
Location: London GMAT Score: 780
|
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 5:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| reachac wrote: | | I am not convinced with the explanation provided for B being the answer...can anyone explain better please. |
And you should be unconvinced- B is not the correct answer. The solutions above would be correct if the question said 'less than', but they are certainly wrong for the question as presented, which says 'greater than'.
If y is greater than or equal to 0,what is the value of x
1) lx-3l is greater than or equal to y
2) lx-3l is greater than or equal to -y
Clearly 1) does not give you the value of x. 2) does not either; if y is positive, then -y is negative. It is obvious then that |x-3| is greater than -y, a negative number; indeed, statement 2) does not tell us anything at all. The answer must be E, since 2) is entirely useless, and 1) is insufficient. _________________ co-founder, www.gmatix.com
-GMAT blogs, free international directory of GMAT tutors and MBA Admissions Consultants, and more... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
reachac Moderator
Joined: 22 Feb 2008 Posts: 523
Thanks given: 1 Thanked 9 times in 9 posts
Test Date: 7th Aug Target GMAT Score: 770 GMAT Score: 780
|
Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 5:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Ian  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|