| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
zagcollins
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!
Joined: 11 Jun 2008
Posts: 167
Thanks given: 16
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 8:37 pm Post subject: Remainder Dilemma |
 |
|
How many integers from 0 to 50, inclusive, have a remainder of 1 when divided by 3 ?
A.15
B.16
C.17
D.18
E.19
I'm getting an answer of 16...IS that correct or is the answer 17? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Vignesh.4384
GMAT Destroyer!
Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 437
Thanks given: 8
Thanked 4 times in 4 posts
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 9:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i think it is 16.
48/3 = 16
so 49 is also within range |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Stuart Kovinsky
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 08 Jan 2008
Posts: 1294
Thanks given: 0
Thanked 217 times in 198 posts
Location: Toronto
GMAT Score: 800
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 9:49 pm Post subject: Re: Remainder Dilemma |
|
|
| zagcollins wrote: | How many integers from 0 to 50, inclusive, have a remainder of 1 when divided by 3 ?
A.15
B.16
C.17
D.18
E.19
I'm getting an answer of 16...IS that correct or is the answer 17? |
It's 17.
There are 51 integers from 0 to 50, inclusive.
If you divide by 3, there are 3 possible remainders: 0, 1 and 2.
So, if there are 51 consecutive integers and 3 possible remainders, there will be 51/3 = 17 of each.
Since 51 is evenly divisble by 3, we don't even have to worry about where in the cycle we started (which we would have had to do if the number of integers weren't divisible by 3).
_________________
Stuart Kovinsky, B.A. LL.B.
Academic Co-ordinator
Kaplan Test Prep & Admissions
Toronto Office
1-800-KAP-TEST
Learn more about me |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
zagcollins
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!
Joined: 11 Jun 2008
Posts: 167
Thanks given: 16
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 10:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| thanks stuart...good logic...tell me something...is OG an accurate representation of the quant section of GMAT? if it isnt, what is? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Stuart Kovinsky
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 08 Jan 2008
Posts: 1294
Thanks given: 0
Thanked 217 times in 198 posts
Location: Toronto
GMAT Score: 800
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 10:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| zagcollins wrote: | | thanks stuart...good logic...tell me something...is OG an accurate representation of the quant section of GMAT? if it isnt, what is? |
The majority of questions in the OG are mid range, i.e. 420-580 level. So, if you're scoring in that range it's great. If you're aiming for a high score, however, most of the questions that you see during the GMAT are tougher than what you see in the OG.
For the most part, the OG presents questions in order of difficulty, so the questions near the end of each section are the tougher ones. There are certainly some very hard questions in the OG, just not that many of them.
If you're looking for higher end questions (and strategies for dealing with them), I recommend Kaplan's 800 book for the GMAT. However, it's very important to be great at the mid-level questions as well. In the past I've helped some students who focused only on the high end questions and ended up getting crushed because they weren't familiar with the questions near the beginning of the exam; remember, you only get to the tough ones if you master the medium ones.
_________________
Stuart Kovinsky, B.A. LL.B.
Academic Co-ordinator
Kaplan Test Prep & Admissions
Toronto Office
1-800-KAP-TEST
Learn more about me |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
zagcollins
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!
Joined: 11 Jun 2008
Posts: 167
Thanks given: 16
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 11:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| exactly...i made tht mistake in the past when i simply concentrated on tuff problems and thn i cudnt solve both, tuff and medium range..now i have started concentrating on both...i have used the kaplan 800 book already..their approach is quite different from the OG...but i like it...makes certain problems much simpler than they actually are...I have bn asking every1 the same question: Should I buy the manhattan series or stick to the books that I have, i.e. OG (all three books) and Kaplan 800?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pepeprepa
GMAT Destroyer!
Joined: 08 Jul 2008
Posts: 660
Thanks given: 10
Thanked 43 times in 41 posts
Location: France
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 1:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Personnally, I find 16
I searched to maximize k in this inequality: 3k+1<=50 with k>0
I found k=16 so the last one wich has a remainder of 1 when divided by 3 is "3*16+1=49"
The first one is when k=1 so "3*1+1=4"
And from 1 to 16 we have ... 16 possible k terms
After that, I noticed some said 16 and other said 17 so I took time to list them 
4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 (40 instead of 39) 43 46 49
Explain to me if I forget one of them. Thks
Last edited by pepeprepa on Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:14 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Suyog
GMAT Destroyer!
Joined: 17 Aug 2006
Posts: 315
Thanks given: 1
Thanked 22 times in 19 posts
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
40 instead of 39... and u r missing 1 in ur list..
makes it 17. Choose (c) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
pepeprepa
GMAT Destroyer!
Joined: 08 Jul 2008
Posts: 660
Thanks given: 10
Thanked 43 times in 41 posts
Location: France
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ok so 1 has a remainder of 1 when divided by 3
and 2 has a remainder of 2 when divided by 3
I know that now: "Every n divided by k with n<k has a remainder of n"
Thank you Suyog.
So it's 17 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ian Stewart
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 02 Jun 2008
Posts: 862
Thanks given: 2
Thanked 166 times in 153 posts
Location: London
GMAT Score: 780
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 10:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| pepeprepa wrote: |
I know that now: "Every n divided by k with n<k has a remainder of n"
|
That's almost true- it's definitely true if n is greater than or equal to zero, and less than k. If n can be negative, then the above is not true.
That said, it's pretty unlikely you'll see a question on the GMAT that asks about the remainder when you divide a negative number by a positive number. Still, it might be a good check to see if you fully understand remainders: "What is the remainder when -7 is divided by 5?" I've never seen a GMAT question that tests this, but I wouldn't be surprised if it showed up at some point.
_________________
co-founder, www.gmatix.com
-GMAT blogs, free international directory of GMAT tutors and MBA Admissions Consultants, and more... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
pepeprepa
GMAT Destroyer!
Joined: 08 Jul 2008
Posts: 660
Thanks given: 10
Thanked 43 times in 41 posts
Location: France
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 10:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| "What is the remainder when -7 is divided by 5?" -2? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ian Stewart
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 02 Jun 2008
Posts: 862
Thanks given: 2
Thanked 166 times in 153 posts
Location: London
GMAT Score: 780
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| pepeprepa wrote: | | "What is the remainder when -7 is divided by 5?" -2? |
Remember that when you divide an integer by 5, the only possible remainders are 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4- so one of those is the correct answer. Think about how you find the remainder when you divide, say, 9 by 5, and try to do the same with -7. I'll leave the question open for a while longer, then post the answer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pepeprepa
GMAT Destroyer!
Joined: 08 Jul 2008
Posts: 660
Thanks given: 10
Thanked 43 times in 41 posts
Location: France
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 1:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"What is the remainder when -7 is divided by 5?"
3
Because -7=5x(-2)+3
It would mean you go on the other way but anyway I do not master the "concept".
If you have examples to master it would be cool.
Thank you for the help to understand. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ian Stewart
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 02 Jun 2008
Posts: 862
Thanks given: 2
Thanked 166 times in 153 posts
Location: London
GMAT Score: 780
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| pepeprepa wrote: | "What is the remainder when -7 is divided by 5?"
3
Because -7=5x(-2)+3
It would mean you go on the other way but anyway I do not master the "concept".
If you have examples to master it would be cool.
Thank you for the help to understand. |
Yes, 3 is the answer. When we find the remainder when we divide, say, 23 by 5, we find the nearest multiple of 5 which is lower than 23, and work out how far away we are. The remainder is 3 because 23 is 3 more than 20, the nearest (smaller) multiple of 5. When we divide -7 by 5, the remainder is also 3, because the nearest multiple of 5 that is smaller than -7 is -10, and -7 is 3 more than -10.
_________________
co-founder, www.gmatix.com
-GMAT blogs, free international directory of GMAT tutors and MBA Admissions Consultants, and more... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
parallel_chase
GMAT Titan
Joined: 20 Jun 2007
Posts: 1002
Thanks given: 16
Thanked 106 times in 99 posts
Target GMAT Score: V50
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ian Stewart wrote: | | pepeprepa wrote: | "What is the remainder when -7 is divided by 5?"
3
Because -7=5x(-2)+3
It would mean you go on the other way but anyway I do not master the "concept".
If you have examples to master it would be cool.
Thank you for the help to understand. |
Yes, 3 is the answer. When we find the remainder when we divide, say, 23 by 5, we find the nearest multiple of 5 which is lower than 23, and work out how far away we are. The remainder is 3 because 23 is 3 more than 20, the nearest (smaller) multiple of 5. When we divide -7 by 5, the remainder is also 3, because the nearest multiple of 5 that is smaller than -7 is -10, and -7 is 3 more than -10. |
Thanks Ian that clears everything. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
