| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
perfectstranger Rising GMAT Star
Joined: 16 Jul 2008 Posts: 32
Thanks given: 7 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 6:15 am Post subject: Help With The Critical Reason Part |
|
|
Hi Gmaters My problem is that I cannot pace my time in CR questions and my success is 60%. My questions are followed below.
1- Is GMAT reading comp. related with Critical Reasoning; that is when Critical reasoning improve does Reading Comp. improve (casual relation) or the linkage between CR and Reading is non-casual.
2- If the relationship which I have mentioned above is casual, do you advise the book of CR Bible by Powerscore? ( Note: I have finished Manhattan CR and Official Guide 11th and OG Verbal once)
3- If not what would you suggest?
Thanks in advance |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
erjamit Really wants to Beat The GMAT!
Joined: 22 Oct 2007 Posts: 170
Thanks given: 4 Thanked 3 times in 2 posts
Test Date: 08/20 Target GMAT Score: 750+
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 7:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would suggest first concentrate on accuracy and then pacing. It implies that lets say if you do 20 CR problems take whatever time you want to take but ensure that you are able to dissect the argument into conclusion, evidence and assumptions clearly. If you can do that a major portion of CR is done. Then attack the answer choices and nail down the correct one using PoE.
CR and RC are related.
In GMAT quantity doesn't matter, quality matters. What I mean is even if you solve 10,000 CR questions and still your accuracy is 50% it implies your approach is not appropriate. You can look at Kaplan Verbal book for CR strategy or google. Practice as well as appropriate strategy are the keys.
I am also struggling with CR/RC with accuracy of 60-70%.
Hope it helps
Amit |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
 |
perfectstranger Rising GMAT Star
Joined: 16 Jul 2008 Posts: 32
Thanks given: 7 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 8:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| thanks amit. Any other suggestion GMATers ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
perfectstranger Rising GMAT Star
Joined: 16 Jul 2008 Posts: 32
Thanks given: 7 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 8:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
My struggles are ;
1- I will not pace my time. Time generally finish when I am on #14 where 16 questions.
2- I get confused in the answer choices because they are so close to each other.
3- I usually get stuck with the inference questions, bold faced questions ,method of reasoning and answer choices with questions(evaluate the argument) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stacey Koprince GMAT Instructor

Joined: 27 Dec 2006 Posts: 1262
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 95 times in 85 posts
Location: Bay Area, California GMAT Score: 770
|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 9:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Okay, let's start with timing.
One of the things you should know is that you aren't going to be able to do every single question to the best of your ability. Sometimes, you're just going to have to let something go - you'll still make an educated guess, ideally, but you won't just continue to sit on the problem. The longer you spend, the more likely you are to get it wrong anyway, and you're also guaranteeing yourself others wrong at the end b/c you ran out of time!
So. Figure out whether there are any patterns in terms of the CR types that tend to cost you too much time. Analyze the argument structure (boldface) tends to take a lot of time for most people. And the good news is, these aren't that common on the test. (Most people get either 0 or 1 of these.) So, for these, instead of spending 3+ minutes (and not having great odds re: getting it right anyway), learn how you can eliminate some of the answer choices reliably, do so, guess from among the remaining choices... and move on.
Inference questions are very common on RC and fairly common on CR (sometimes called "draw a conclusion" on CR - but that's the same type), so for those, you'll need to get better. The basic thing to remember is this: when the test asks you to infer or draw a conclusion, what they really want is for you to tell them something that MUST be true, no argument, given the information in the problem / passage. If you have to make even a tiny little assumption - that choice is wrong.
This is tricky because, in the real world, when someone asks you to infer something, they usually do want you to make some assumptions and use your outside knowledge of the topic / world to conclude something that is only plausible, but doesn't have to be 100% true. That is NOT what this test wants. The correct answer has to be something with which you cannot argue - according to the info given in the passage, it's got to work.
For example, I might tell you that chocolate is my favorite flavor of ice cream. In the real world, you might infer that I like chocolate in general, or I like ice cream in general. And, yes, there's a good chance that both of those things are true. But they don't HAVE to be definitely true, without a doubt. What is true, without a doubt, is that vanilla is not my favorite flavor of ice cream. I've already said chocolate's my favorite and, by definition, you only have one favorite. (I know we sometimes say we have two favorites - but that's not consistent with the definition of "favorite.")
Finally, on your item #2, start studying why wrong answers are wrong. Maybe, on a "weaken the conclusion" question, you have a choice that addresses one of the premises, but doesn't actually affect the conclusion. It's tempting because it does address a given premise - it's got all the right keywords, etc. But the question asked us to weaken the conclusion... so any choices that don't actually affect the conclusion can't be right.
Play this game: for every problem you study from now on (you can do this with RC too), ask yourself, "Of the 4 wrong answers, which one do I think is the most commonly chosen wrong answer and why? Why is it so tempting? And why is it wrong even though it's so tempting?" You can even post problems here and ask people to weigh in - what do they think is most tempting (but wrong) and why? That will help you to start to identify WRONG answers (in particular, the tempting ones) with confidence. _________________ Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Corporate Development, Northern California
Manhattan GMAT
Contributor to Beat The GMAT!
Learn more about me |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
 |
|
|
beatthegmat Founder

Joined: 13 Feb 2006 Posts: 3774
Thanks given: 29 Thanked 221 times in 124 posts
Location: California GMAT Score: 720
|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 9:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Great response, Stacey! Moved this post to CR forum area. _________________ Eric
Discounts on Kaplan, Manhattan GMAT, Veritas Prep, and Stacy Blackman Consulting - see the links at the top of the page for more info.
Learn more about me |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raunekk GMAT Destroyer!
Joined: 16 Apr 2008 Posts: 839
Thanks given: 10 Thanked 37 times in 37 posts
Target GMAT Score: 740
|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Stacey ,that was an awesome explanation....!!
Thanks a lot!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
erjamit Really wants to Beat The GMAT!
Joined: 22 Oct 2007 Posts: 170
Thanks given: 4 Thanked 3 times in 2 posts
Test Date: 08/20 Target GMAT Score: 750+
|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 8:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Stacey for your gems.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iwill Really wants to Beat The GMAT!
Joined: 11 Jun 2008 Posts: 136
Thanks given: 2 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
Location: Bangalore Test Date: sept GMAT Score: 590
|
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 1:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Thanks a lot Stacey ! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
"GMAT" and other GMAC™ trademarks are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council™. The Graduate Management Admission Council™ does not endorse, nor is it affiliated in any way with the owner or any content on this website. The opinions expressed here are solely those of the author or those of the members of this website. Copyright © 2008 BTG Test Prep, LLC. Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group.
|
|