Free GMAT Flashcards available for download!

Salary :D


 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Beat The GMAT Forum Index -> GMAT Math -> Data Sufficiency
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
codesnooker
GMAT Destroyer!


Joined: 18 Jan 2008
Posts: 491

Thanks given: 9
Thanked 26 times in 25 posts


Test Date: Not Decided
Target GMAT Score: 800
GMAT Score: 580

PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 1:52 am    Post subject: Salary :D Reply with quote

How to solve this question?

This post contains an attachment. You must be logged in to download/view this file.
Please login or register as a user.


_________________
Code Snooker
-----------------
Decisions are neither wrong nor right, only their results are either good or bad.
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message
olika
Rising GMAT Star


Joined: 10 Nov 2007
Posts: 55

Thanks given: 13
Thanked 1 times in 1 posts


PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 7:38 am    Post subject: Re: Salary :D Reply with quote

Is the answer "C"?

I would solve it in this way.

Lets label 'K'- Karen's salary in '95 and 'J' - Jason's salary in '95.
In 1995, the difference between Karen's salary and Jason's salary was 2,000 (K-J=2,000).
In 1998, the gap between their salaries increased by 400, which represents "p" percent. So, we have 2,000 is 100% and 400 is p%. Solving this, we get p=20%.

The answer is C. We need both statements.
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message
ksh
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!


Joined: 17 Feb 2008
Posts: 107

Thanks given: 1
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts


PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 3:56 am    Post subject: Re: Salary :D Reply with quote

olika wrote:
Is the answer "C"?

I would solve it in this way.

Lets label 'K'- Karen's salary in '95 and 'J' - Jason's salary in '95.
In 1995, the difference between Karen's salary and Jason's salary was 2,000 (K-J=2,000).
In 1998, the gap between their salaries increased by 400, which represents "p" percent. So, we have 2,000 is 100% and 400 is p%. Solving this, we get p=20%.

The answer is C. We need both statements.


From the available data (combining 1+2), we can get value of p i.e. $440. But certaily in percentage term it can not be derived since Jason's salary is not mentioned. What is the OA codesnooker?
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message
olika
Rising GMAT Star


Joined: 10 Nov 2007
Posts: 55

Thanks given: 13
Thanked 1 times in 1 posts


PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 7:15 am    Post subject: Re: Salary :D Reply with quote

ksh wrote:
From the available data (combining 1+2), we can get value of p i.e. $440. But certaily in percentage term it can not be derived since Jason's salary is not mentioned. What is the OA codesnooker?


Give your solution Smile
You can solve this problem in more complicated way... But still you'll get the answer C.

Lets
K - Karen's salary in '95
J - Jason's salary in '95

(100K+KP)/100 - Karen's salary in '98
(100J+JP)/100 - Jason's salary in '98

Then

K-J=2000
((100K+KP)/100) - ((100J+JP)/100)=2400
Solving these two equations, you will get p=100*400/2000, which means that C is correct answer
Very Happy
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message
Thanked by: augusto
lunarpower
GMAT Instructor


Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 530

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 69 times in 66 posts


GMAT Score: 800

PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 10:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

remember that you can think of percentage increases in the same way in which you'd think of just multiplying by a constant - because that's all that percentage increases really are, after all.*

simpler analogy:
let's say you multiply a series of numbers x, y, and z by some unknown constant. now let's say i tell you that the gaps between the numbers are 3 times as big as they used to be.
what does this mean?
it means that we must have tripled the numbers, because the size of the gaps increases proportionally with the size of the numbers themselves.

this means that, if we know the number by which the gaps between the numbers have been multiplied (which is the same as knowing the % change in those gaps), we'll also know the multiplier / % change for the numbers themselves.

in this problem, if we take the 2 statements together, we know that the gap between the salaries has increased by a factor of 2440/2000 = 1.22; this means a percentage increase of 22%. (note that you don't really care about the specific percentages, since this is data sufficiency; all that matters is that you can find them.)
therefore, the salaries themselves have increased by 22 percent.
that means both statements together are sufficient.

--

note that none of the above reasoning is valid if the quantities increase by different percentages.

--

*as a side note, it's extremely useful to be able to use percentage multipliers for percent increases. some examples:
to increase a quantity by 14%, multiply by 1.14
to increase a quantity by 70%, multiply by 1.7
to decrease a quantity by 14%, multiply by 0.86
to decrease a quantity by 70%, multiply by 0.3
etc.

_________________
ron purewal

instructor, mgmat

Learn more about me
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Beat The GMAT Forum Index -> GMAT Math -> Data Sufficiency All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum



"GMAT" and other GMAC™ trademarks are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council™. The Graduate Management Admission Council™ does not endorse, nor is it affiliated in any way with the owner or any content on this website. The opinions expressed here are solely those of the author or those of the members of this website. Copyright © 2008 BTG Test Prep, LLC. Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group.