| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ksutthi Just gettin' started!
Joined: 30 Mar 2008 Posts: 8
Thanks given: 3 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 1:21 am Post subject: Is m+z > 0? |
|
|
Got this from practice test 1. Can somebody help?
Is m+z > 0?
(1) m-3z > 0
(2) 4z-m > 0
Thanks a lot. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
szapiszapo Just gettin' started!
Joined: 30 Jun 2008 Posts: 28
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 2 times in 2 posts
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 3:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
does the wording states that m & z can be either positive or negative?
if m & z can be positive or negative, then i guess answer is E |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ksutthi Just gettin' started!
Joined: 30 Mar 2008 Posts: 8
Thanks given: 3 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 4:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
m and z can be anything. The question is just like that.
The answer is (C). But I was wondering how I can derive that answer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ildude02 GMAT Destroyer!
Joined: 13 Jan 2008 Posts: 320
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 6 times in 6 posts
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 8:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
I solved it by plugging in numbers and it took me a while. I wonder if there is an easier way to solve it and I bet there is. Ian, Stuart or anyone, please share your thoughts with the easier approach . This questions format seems to be common and I would appreciate anyone's input on solving this question.
Now that I thought about it more, this is what I came up with when combining both the statements,
3z < m < 4z; for m and z +ve values, m > -z will always be true;
This equation cannot be solved when we consider negative values for Z. You could see that with Z as -ve value, we get,
-3Z < M < -4Z. There cannot be a value to satify this equation since something greater then -3z will always be greater then -4Z. So, that leaves us wth Z always taking a +ve value and whne Z is +ve, M is always +ve as well. That would mean, M > -Z is always TRUE .
Just wanted to make sure is this a valid assumption for not considering negative values for Z?
Last edited by ildude02 on Sun Jul 06, 2008 8:49 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wilderness Really wants to Beat The GMAT!
Joined: 15 Mar 2008 Posts: 102
Thanks given: 23 Thanked 4 times in 4 posts
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 8:44 am Post subject: Re: Is m+z > 0? |
|
|
| ksutthi wrote: | Got this from practice test 1. Can somebody help?
Is m+z > 0?
(1) m-3z > 0
(2) 4z-m > 0
Thanks a lot. |
Sum the 2 inequalities and we get z > 0.
If z>0 then they only way (1) is possible is if m is also positive.
Hence both numbers are positive and thus m+z > 0
So C is correct. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
 |
|
|
ildude02 GMAT Destroyer!
Joined: 13 Jan 2008 Posts: 320
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 6 times in 6 posts
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 8:54 am Post subject: Re: Is m+z > 0? |
|
|
I'm curious to see your logic for concluding that Z> 0 when combining both the statemets.
| wilderness wrote: | | ksutthi wrote: | Got this from practice test 1. Can somebody help?
Is m+z > 0?
(1) m-3z > 0
(2) 4z-m > 0
Thanks a lot. |
Sum the 2 inequalities and we get z > 0.
If z>0 then they only way (1) is possible is if m is also positive.
Hence both numbers are positive and thus m+z > 0
So C is correct. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wilderness Really wants to Beat The GMAT!
Joined: 15 Mar 2008 Posts: 102
Thanks given: 23 Thanked 4 times in 4 posts
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 2:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If both (1) and (2) are separately greater than 0 then their sum must also be greater than 0.
i.e. m-3z + 4z - m > 0
which give z > 0
Hope it helps. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ildude02 GMAT Destroyer!
Joined: 13 Jan 2008 Posts: 320
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 6 times in 6 posts
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 5:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|