Free GMAT Flashcards available for download!

Huh? :roll:


 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Beat The GMAT Forum Index -> GMAT Math -> Data Sufficiency
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
smclean23
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!


Joined: 23 Jun 2008
Posts: 160

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts


PostPosted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 5:22 pm    Post subject: Huh? :roll: Reply with quote

A jewelry dealer initially offered a bracelet for sale at an asking price that would give a profit to the dealer of 40 percent of the original cost. What was the original cost of the bracelet?
(1) After reducing this asking price by 10 percent, the jewelry dealer sold the bracelet at a profit of $403.
(2) The jewelry dealer sold the bracelet for $1,953.

Answer is A.....I understand (1), but if he sold the bracelet for $1953, which is a 40% profit to find the original cost...wouldn't 1.4x=1953 be sufficient?
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message
Stuart Kovinsky
GMAT Instructor


Joined: 08 Jan 2008
Posts: 1280

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 215 times in 196 posts

Location: Toronto
GMAT Score: 800

PostPosted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 5:24 pm    Post subject: Re: Huh? :roll: Reply with quote

smclean23 wrote:
A jewelry dealer initially offered a bracelet for sale at an asking price that would give a profit to the dealer of 40 percent of the original cost. What was the original cost of the bracelet?
(1) After reducing this asking price by 10 percent, the jewelry dealer sold the bracelet at a profit of $403.
(2) The jewelry dealer sold the bracelet for $1,953.

Answer is A.....I understand (1), but if he sold the bracelet for $1953, which is a 40% profit to find the original cost...wouldn't 1.4x=1953 be sufficient?


You have to read the stem very carefully:

Quote:
A jewelry dealer initially offered a bracelet for sale at an asking price that would ...


If you decide that (2) is sufficient alone, you're assuming that the final selling price is the same as the initial selling price. Since we're not explicitly told that the two prices are the same, we shouldn't assume that they are.

Just curious, what's the source of this question?

_________________
Stuart Kovinsky, B.A. LL.B.
Academic Co-ordinator
Kaplan Test Prep & Admissions
Toronto Office
1-800-KAP-TEST

Learn more about me
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Vignesh.4384
GMAT Destroyer!


Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 437

Thanks given: 8
Thanked 3 times in 3 posts


PostPosted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 6:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

such a easy question but i guess many would assumed what Stuart said..
Anyway i got it wrong too. dint take these 2 words "initially offered" very seriously.
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message
Ian Stewart
GMAT Instructor


Joined: 02 Jun 2008
Posts: 862

Thanks given: 2
Thanked 166 times in 153 posts

Location: London
GMAT Score: 780

PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 7:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Like Stuart, I'm also curious about the source of the question.

These kinds of traps aren't what the GMAT is about.
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message
smclean23
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!


Joined: 23 Jun 2008
Posts: 160

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts


PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 8:23 am    Post subject: Re: Huh? :roll: Reply with quote

Stuart Kovinsky wrote:
smclean23 wrote:
A jewelry dealer initially offered a bracelet for sale at an asking price that would give a profit to the dealer of 40 percent of the original cost. What was the original cost of the bracelet?
(1) After reducing this asking price by 10 percent, the jewelry dealer sold the bracelet at a profit of $403.
(2) The jewelry dealer sold the bracelet for $1,953.

Answer is A.....I understand (1), but if he sold the bracelet for $1953, which is a 40% profit to find the original cost...wouldn't 1.4x=1953 be sufficient?


You have to read the stem very carefully:

Quote:
A jewelry dealer initially offered a bracelet for sale at an asking price that would ...


If you decide that (2) is sufficient alone, you're assuming that the final selling price is the same as the initial selling price. Since we're not explicitly told that the two prices are the same, we shouldn't assume that they are.

Just curious, what's the source of this question?



I am not sure. This came from the "Resources" Section. I forgot the exact name or title, but something along the lines of "1000 DS Problems"..
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Beat The GMAT Forum Index -> GMAT Math -> Data Sufficiency All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum



"GMAT" and other GMAC™ trademarks are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council™. The Graduate Management Admission Council™ does not endorse, nor is it affiliated in any way with the owner or any content on this website. The opinions expressed here are solely those of the author or those of the members of this website. Copyright © 2008 BTG Test Prep, LLC. Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group.