Announcement, 11/3/08: Welcome Test Prep New York experts!

GMAT Prep?? (Sight-Seeing Tour)


 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Beat The GMAT Forum Index -> GMAT Math -> Data Sufficiency
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
dferm
GMAT Destroyer!


Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Posts: 444

Thanks given: 37
Thanked 1 times in 1 posts


PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 7:22 am    Post subject: GMAT Prep?? (Sight-Seeing Tour) Reply with quote

On a certain sight-seeing tour, the ratio of the number of women to the number of children was 5 to 2. What was the number of men on the sight-seeing tour?

(1) On the sight-seeing tour, the ratio of the number of children to the number of men was 5 to 11

(2) The number of women on the sight-seeing tour was less than 30.

Please Explain....

I got this question Correct..but seem to have a little difficulty setting up the equation..Can someone help?

Thanks.
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message
zacharyz
Rising GMAT Star


Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Posts: 68

Thanks given: 3
Thanked 5 times in 5 posts


Test Date: June 7, 2008
Target GMAT Score: 760

PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 9:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Given
Women to Children
5 : 2

You are given a ratio, but not real numbers of people. So at this point, the number of women could be any multiple of 5.

Answer A - insufficient
You now have the ratio of children to men, but no "real numbers"
Children to Men
5 : 11

For reference, you now have a translation from women to men also. You need to have the translation (aka CHILDREN) to have the name number though. So, let's multiply the first equation by 5 and the second equation by 2:
Women to Children Children to Men
25 : 10 10 : 22
therefore:
Women to Children to Men:
25 : 10 : 22

Answer B - insufficient
This gives you nothing about the number of men AND it doesn't really tell you the number of women.


Put them together:
From statement (A), you have a translation from a hypothetical number of women (namely 25) to a hypothetical number of men (22). You cannot reduce the ratio 25:10:22 any further as they share no factors other than 1. Therefore, if there were less than 30 women, there had to have been exactly 25. And now you know there were 22 men.

So the answer is (C) - Both together are required.


For arguments sake, if (B) had given "the number of women was less than 60," then you still don't know the number of men. Because you could have had 25 women and 22 men or 50 women and 44 men.
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message
ksh
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!


Joined: 17 Feb 2008
Posts: 107

Thanks given: 1
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts


PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 11:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

1. Insufficient w/c=5/2 =>c=2w/5

2. Insufficient c/m=5/11, m=11*2w/25

since no. of women on the tour are less than 30, it can not definitely be determined how many men are there.

IMO E
------------------
Is it the right ans?
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message
Stuart Kovinsky
GMAT Instructor


Joined: 08 Jan 2008
Posts: 1226

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 203 times in 185 posts

Location: Toronto
GMAT Score: 800

PostPosted: Tue May 06, 2008 8:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ksh wrote:
1. Insufficient w/c=5/2 =>c=2w/5

2. Insufficient c/m=5/11, m=11*2w/25

since no. of women on the tour are less than 30, it can not definitely be determined how many men are there.

IMO E
------------------
Is it the right ans?


C is correct.

You have to remember that in certain cases, we can deduce that the variables stand for integers.

It's impossible to have 12.5 women. So, even though algebraically there could be other values for w, since w stands for an indivisible object we know that w=25, at which point we can solve for everything else too.

_________________
Stuart Kovinsky, B.A. LL.B.
Academic Co-ordinator
Kaplan Test Prep & Admissions
Toronto Office
1-800-KAP-TEST

Learn more about me
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
amitansu
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!


Joined: 26 Feb 2008
Posts: 293

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 8 times in 8 posts


Target GMAT Score: 750

PostPosted: Wed May 07, 2008 12:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think this is a classic example of GMAT trap !!

In the q it asks for a perticular no. not a ratio !! so 1) is insufficient
from 2 we can say we have W < 30

And as it is, we can't have a GCD of both 25 and 22 (W/M=25/22)
we have to stick that fact tha W=25 and M=22 !!

Thanks Stuart again for this wonderful solution !!

Amit
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Beat The GMAT Forum Index -> GMAT Math -> Data Sufficiency All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum



"GMAT" and other GMAC™ trademarks are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council™. The Graduate Management Admission Council™ does not endorse, nor is it affiliated in any way with the owner or any content on this website. The opinions expressed here are solely those of the author or those of the members of this website. Copyright © 2008 BTG Test Prep, LLC. Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group.