| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
resilient GMAT Destroyer!
Joined: 06 May 2007 Posts: 701
Thanks given: 20 Thanked 3 times in 3 posts
Location: Southern California, USA Target GMAT Score: 710
|
Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 5:12 pm Post subject: mgmat 2 |
|
|
Unlike juvenile diabetes, which is a genetic condition present from birth, type-2 diabetes is acquired in adulthood, generally as a result of obesity and inactivity. The number of cases of type-2 diabetes has been steadily increasing in the United States since 1970, indicating to many researchers that the American population is becoming increasingly heavy and sedentary. If the government wishes to stem the spread of the disease, it should educate the public about the dangers of an inactive, calorie-laden lifestyle and promote healthful diets and exercise.
Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest reason to believe that the proposed education program will NOT be effective?
a.School health programs already educate middle-school students about the issue.
b.The public already has access to this information through the Internet.
c.Food companies encourage the public to indulge in unhealthful snacks.
d.The government has not set aside money for such a program.
e.Healthful foods and exercise programs are beyond the financial means of many people.
qa is e however the choice is not close to the conclusion of the government setting up this program. Also it talks about the any peoples buying power rather than governemnets. _________________ Appetite for 700 and I scraped my plate! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
ptgbeauregard Just gettin' started!
Joined: 09 May 2008 Posts: 17
Thanks given: 2 Thanked 1 times in 1 posts
Location: Bethesda, MD Test Date: 6/16/08 Target GMAT Score: 750
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the government's program of promoting healthful diets and exercise would be rendered ineffective if people are financially unable to follow their suggestions. _________________ leaf |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sanjaylakhani Just gettin' started!
Joined: 30 Apr 2008 Posts: 6
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
|
Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 11:28 pm Post subject: Critical Reasoning :: RE: Suger Quotas |
|
|
The answer A does nto weaken the conclusion,infact it strengthen the conclusion - that with each quota-prices increased- so the conclusion- abolish quota to reduce prices is right
Answer E talks about increase in price beofre quotas were implemented and talks about price rise that happ even before the quotas were there- effectively saying that without quotas also prices were increasing-so ther eis some other cause which is leading tp price rise- and abolishing quotas will nt help |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|