cost Vs costs

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 7:11 am

cost Vs costs

by cks » Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:07 pm
Can some one help me to understand the singular/plural question.

"These shoes cost $100" Shoes - Plural Cost - Plural
"This mistake cost him his job" Mistake - Singular Cost - Singular ???

I thought 'cost' is plural and 'costs' is singular..

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 49
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 5:56 pm
Thanked: 3 times

by smushkas » Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:36 pm
Hey there,

In the second sentence "cost" is in the past tense.
https://www.usingenglish.com/reference/i ... /cost.html

Hope this helps.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 7:11 am

by cks » Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:40 pm
Let me post the original question from OG 11 SC Q 41

While large banks can afford to maintain their own data-processing operations, many smaller regional and community banks are finding that the cost associated with upgrading data-processing equipment and with the development and maintenance of new products and technical staff are prohibitive.

A cost associated with
B costs associated with
C costs arising from
D cost of
E costs of

OA is B.

Here the "costs" is considered as Plural WHY??

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
Followed by:614 members
GMAT Score:800

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Wed Feb 27, 2008 9:07 pm
cks wrote:Let me post the original question from OG 11 SC Q 41

While large banks can afford to maintain their own data-processing operations, many smaller regional and community banks are finding that the cost associated with upgrading data-processing equipment and with the development and maintenance of new products and technical staff are prohibitive.

A cost associated with
B costs associated with
C costs arising from
D cost of
E costs of

OA is B.

Here the "costs" is considered as Plural WHY??
Cost could certainly have been singular if this sentence were written differently.

A cardinal rule of sentence correction is that you have to change the underlined part to match the non-underlined part. If a word isn't underlined, then it's correct.

In the non-underlined part, we have "are prohibitive" - a plural verb. Since we have a plural verb, we need a plural noun - in this case, "costs".

The sentence also would be correct if "are prohibitive" were changed to "is prohibitive", but we're not allowed to do that in this case.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 7:11 am

by cks » Thu Feb 28, 2008 6:03 am
Stuart Kovinsky,

Thanks for the explanation.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Fri Mar 07, 2008 2:10 am
this is obvious enough that you've probably noticed it, but i'll do my due diligence and post it anyway: your example uses completely different words than does the og example you've posted.

your example uses cost(s) as a verb (and conflates the present and past tenses, too).

the og example uses cost(s) as a noun, which must be chosen to agree with the verb that appears later in the sentence.

these are in effect two different words - one a noun, the other a verb - that just happen to look the same. any correlations between them, though, are spurious and should be ignored in the name of proper grammar.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 39
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 12:17 am

by yalephd2007 » Sun Apr 13, 2008 4:57 pm
Costs should be used.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 64
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 6:42 am
Thanked: 1 times

by moadhia » Tue Mar 10, 2009 7:08 pm
I was wondering about the answer choices given. Would

- cost associated with
- cost arising from
- cost of

mean the same thing in this sentence?? The OG discards them because they are not parallel but would the meaning of the sentence stay the same with these 3 choices ? Just curious to know.

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 8:54 pm

by pravsj » Wed Apr 28, 2010 8:57 am
Reopening this thread.
Hi Ron,
I still have the confusion regarding the usage of 'are'.Is this 'are' not indicates to two clauses assoicated with And conjuction.
cost associated with upgrading data-processing equipment and with the development and maintenance of new products and technical staff are prohibitive

can you please help me to explain this confusion.

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2018 3:08 am