Mayan technology of writing ...

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 857
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 1:36 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:15 members

Mayan technology of writing ...

by AIM GMAT » Fri Mar 18, 2011 8:49 am
The combination of consonant-vowel syllabic glyphs and logographs in
ancient Mayan gave the scribes a variety of choices with which to write
the words of their texts in detail. For example, one very common
honorific title in Maya texts is ahaw, meaning "•lord"– or "•noble."– Ahaw
may be written in logographic form as a head in profile, with the
distinctive headband or scarf that marked the highest nobility in Maya
society. But it is also possible to write the word as a combination of three
phonetic, syllabic signs: a-ha-wa. Likewise, the word pakal ("•shield"–) can
be indicated by a depiction of a shield or by the combination of syllabic
elements pa-ka-la.

Mayan signs are by nature highly pictorial, often representing in
considerable detail animals, people, body parts and objects of daily life.
The pictorial principle is taken to the extreme in inscriptions composed of
"•full-figure"– glyphs, in which individual signs and numbers become
animated and are shown interacting with one another. None of this
should be taken to mean that the Maya only wrote in simple pictures. The
Maya wrote both logographically and phonetically, and within their
phonetic system alone, the Maya had multiple options. All English words
are formed from various combinations of only 26 phonetic signs. By
contrast, all Maya words can be formed from various combinations of
nearly 800 consonant-vowel glyphs, each representing a full syllable.
Sounds are formed by combining a particular consonant with one of the
five vowels (hence a syllabary, rather than an alphabet).

Because many Maya signs remain undeciphered, it's not possible to
state precisely the relative proportions of logographic and syllabic signs.
But a significant number of the logograms have been deciphered and the
number of deciphered syllabic signs keeps growing. Epigraphers have
filled more than half of the syllabic grid, meant to plot the consonants of
the spoken Maya language against its vowels and thus represents the
totality of signs needed to write the language. It must be remembered
that the discovery of the structure of the syllabic elements-Knorozov's
main contribution-was made a little more than 30 years ago.
Furthermore, the consonant-vowel syllables that are already understood
are the common ones.

Nonetheless, the pace of phonetic decipherment is bound to increase in
the coming years as more resources are trained on it. One aspect of
Maya writing that may complicate this progress is the fact that different
signs can be allographs. Such equivalences are common in Maya texts
(there are at least five different signs that could be chosen to represent
the Maya syllable ba). Each scribe chose from several different signs to
convey the sounds. In evaluating a particular phonetic interpretation of a
syllable, it's helpful to identify as many as possible of the variant forms;
so the process of recognizing allographs depends on the slow work of
comparing many texts in order to find variant spellings of the same word.

1. The author mentions Knorozov in the third paragraph in order to:
A. prove that the recent discovery of Maya signs has led to its lack of
decipherment.
B. offer an explanation for what may appear to be a relative paucity in
the completion of the Maya sign syllabic grid.
C. argue that expert linguists have been stymied in their attempts to
decipher and understand many allographic Maya signs.
D. show how the understanding of other linguistic structures may
improve the comprehension of Maya syllabic signs.
E. weaken the argument stated in the previous paragraph

2. As used in the passage by the author, the term "•logographic"– most closely
refers to:
A. a written phonetic representation of a word.
B. a syllabic division of an individual word.
C. an imagistic representation of an idea.
D. a visual picture of an idiomatic phrase.
E. the process of designing a logo

3. The author of the passage would be LEAST likely to agree with which of the
following statements?
A. Languages whose writing is composed of pictorial signs can
demonstrate a remarkable degree of complexity and detail.
B. Linguistic signs based on syllabic or phonetic coding may be easier to
decipher than those based on visual images.
C. Logographic languages are restricted to the expression of simple
ideas because of their emphasis on image.
D. The existence of allographs in Maya signs indicates the complexity of
this linguistic system.
E. The Mayans made use of both logographics as well as phonetics

OA BCC


What you guys feel about the difficulty of the RC questions ?
Thanks & Regards,
AIM GMAT

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1101
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 7:26 am
Thanked: 47 times
Followed by:13 members
GMAT Score:640

by HSPA » Sat Mar 19, 2011 12:13 am
Hi AIM, I invested 14 min and got 1 write :(... tough for me

Para 1:
Mayan approach to write words, L,G
example: noble word using L
we can alos use syllables

para 2:
Pictorial syllables using what they get from natue
Picture to exteme full G

Maya wrote Logo and phono..not only pics
26 phono english, 800G syllables(C+V)

Para 3:
it is tough to pronounce all
logograms are deciphered
only half is decipered

Para 4:
more can be deciphered in coming years
constraint: diff allographs
each schriebe aus several diff signs
slow allo due ot various spelling

1)D
2)B
3)C

Legendary Member
Posts: 857
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 1:36 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:15 members

by AIM GMAT » Sat Mar 19, 2011 12:30 am
I agree with you HSPA , it took me some 8 mins , got only 1 right the last one . It was the first passage i took into study so i thought i m not grooved enough and may be not concentrated , will mark this passage and catch it up again later sometime . The language was also tough didnt seemed English :) .
Thanks & Regards,
AIM GMAT

Legendary Member
Posts: 586
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 4:38 am
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:5 members
GMAT Score:730

by rohu27 » Fri Mar 25, 2011 4:12 am
AIM,

Can you plz post OE for Q 3?
I marked E coz of the followign lines from para 2:

None of this
should be taken to mean that the Maya only wrote in simple pictures.

it does contradict the OA? doesnt it?

Legendary Member
Posts: 857
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 1:36 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:15 members

by AIM GMAT » Fri Mar 25, 2011 5:18 am
rohu27 wrote:AIM,

Can you plz post OE for Q 3?
I marked E coz of the followign lines from para 2:

None of this
should be taken to mean that the Maya only wrote in simple pictures.

it does contradict the OA? doesnt it?

Its mentioned in Para2 [option E] , the question asks about the option author would be LEAST likely to agree .The author would disagree with any option that would say that Mayan writing was not complex and C does that .All other options mentions about the complex nature of Mayan writing .

Hope that helps.
Thanks & Regards,
AIM GMAT

Legendary Member
Posts: 586
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 4:38 am
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:5 members
GMAT Score:730

by rohu27 » Fri Mar 25, 2011 5:21 am
oopss..thnks a lot. missed the word LEAST.
AIM GMAT wrote:
rohu27 wrote:AIM,

Can you plz post OE for Q 3?
I marked E coz of the followign lines from para 2:

None of this
should be taken to mean that the Maya only wrote in simple pictures.

it does contradict the OA? doesnt it?

Its mentioned in Para2 [option E] , the question asks about the option author would be LEAST likely to agree .The author would disagree with any option that would say that Mayan writing was not complex and C does that .All other options mentions about the complex nature of Mayan writing .

Hope that helps.