a tense problem

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 12:31 am
Thanked: 7 times
GMAT Score:690

a tense problem

by rx_11 » Sat Jan 01, 2011 8:01 am
2. Although a surge in retail sales have raised hopes that there is a recovery finally under way, many economists say that without a large amount of spending the recovery might not last.

(A) have raised hopes that there is a recovery finally
(B) raised hopes for there being a recovery finally
(C) had raised hopes for a recovery finally being
(D) has raised hopes that a recovery is finally
(E) raised hopes for a recovery finally


Hello, everyone,

OA is D

I am very confused about tense of the correct answer. Can any expert explain why we use present tense after a present perfect? (A surge in retail sales has raised hopes that a recovery is finally under way)

I wonder whether it is still correct if we use "a recovery would be finally under way".. Any experts can answer me the two questions? Thanks very much!!!!
Stacey's big fan.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1255
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 2:08 pm
Location: St. Louis
Thanked: 312 times
Followed by:90 members

by Tani » Sat Jan 01, 2011 11:01 am
People are not hoping that a recovery started in the past and is continuing (i.e.present perfect), but that the recovery is happening now (i.e. present).
Tani Wolff

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:49 am
rx_11 wrote:I wonder whether it is still correct if we use "a recovery would be finally under way".. Any experts can answer me the two questions? Thanks very much!!!!
no, that'd be incorrect.

"WOULD" AND "COULD"
These words have 2 different incarnations.

Usage #1
"Would" is the past tense of "will", and "could" is the past tense of "can".
e.g.
According to his most recent advertisement, Mookie the Bookie can predict with 100% accuracy which teams will win next week's games.
vis-à-vis
His October 2, 1982, advertisement declared that Mookie the Bookie could predict with 100% accuracy which teams would win the following week's games.

Usage #2
"Would" and "could" are used to describe hypothetical situations that are not true.
(since these situations are hypothetical -- i.e., they never happened -- they don't really have a timeframe.)
e.g.
If I had one million dollars, I could buy 800,000 hamburgers at the gas station.
If I had one million dollars, I would donate 800,000 hamburgers to the county food bank.


--

your proposed replacement doesn't satisfy the criteria for either of these two, so it's incorrect.

by the way, suggesting possible changes to answer choices is usually a horrible idea; doing so often introduces a whole new set of complications that are non-issues in the original problem.
it's best to stick with discussing the choices that are in front of you; there's already plenty of trouble just with those choices, without the possible headaches of introducing new choices. remember -- despite the ironic name "sentence correction", you don't have to be able to fix sentences; you just have to be able to identify what is correct and what is incorrect.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 12:31 am
Thanked: 7 times
GMAT Score:690

by rx_11 » Sun Jan 02, 2011 3:53 am
lunarpower wrote:
rx_11 wrote:I wonder whether it is still correct if we use "a recovery would be finally under way".. Any experts can answer me the two questions? Thanks very much!!!!
no, that'd be incorrect.

"WOULD" AND "COULD"
These words have 2 different incarnations.

Usage #1
"Would" is the past tense of "will", and "could" is the past tense of "can".
e.g.
According to his most recent advertisement, Mookie the Bookie can predict with 100% accuracy which teams will win next week's games.
vis-à-vis
His October 2, 1982, advertisement declared that Mookie the Bookie could predict with 100% accuracy which teams would win the following week's games.

Usage #2
"Would" and "could" are used to describe hypothetical situations that are not true.
(since these situations are hypothetical -- i.e., they never happened -- they don't really have a timeframe.)
e.g.
If I had one million dollars, I could buy 800,000 hamburgers at the gas station.
If I had one million dollars, I would donate 800,000 hamburgers to the county food bank.


--

your proposed replacement doesn't satisfy the criteria for either of these two, so it's incorrect.

by the way, suggesting possible changes to answer choices is usually a horrible idea; doing so often introduces a whole new set of complications that are non-issues in the original problem.
it's best to stick with discussing the choices that are in front of you; there's already plenty of trouble just with those choices, without the possible headaches of introducing new choices. remember -- despite the ironic name "sentence correction", you don't have to be able to fix sentences; you just have to be able to identify what is correct and what is incorrect.

Thanks very much!!!
Stacey's big fan.