| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
magical cook GMAT Destroyer!
Joined: 30 Jul 2006 Posts: 484
Thanks given: 6 Thanked 1 times in 1 posts
|
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 8:19 pm Post subject: animal allegy |
|
|
People who have spent a lot of time in contact with animals often develop
animal-induced allergies, a significant percentage of which are quite serious. In a
survey of current employees in major zoos, about 30 percent had animal-induced
allergies. However, a zoo employee who develops a serious animal-induced allergy
is very likely to switch to some other occupation.
Which of the following hypotheses receives the strongest support from the
information given?
A. The incidence of serious animal-induced allergies among current zoo
employees is lower than that among the general population.
B. Zoo employees tend to develop animal-induced allergies that are more serious
than those of other people who spend equally large amounts of time with
animals.
C. Exposure to domestic pets is, on the whole, less likely to cause
animal-induced allergy than is exposure to the kinds of animals that are kept
in zoos.
D. There is no occupation for which the risk of developing an animal-induced
allergy is higher than 30 percent.
E. Among members of the general population who have spent as much time with
animals as zoo employees typically have, the percentage with animal-induced
allergies is significantly more than 30 percent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Bharat Rising GMAT Star
Joined: 23 Jul 2007 Posts: 42
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 1 times in 1 posts
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 1:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
I believe the answer must be E.
Note that approx 30% zoo employees get the allergy & hence switch the jobs...thus they move to other jobs (or become the general population).
Just to add in filtering useful information, the given information never discusses about the pets (C) or higher/lower risk in other professions or general populations.
Let me know in case of any errors. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
camitava GMAT Destroyer!
Joined: 05 Sep 2007 Posts: 616
Thanks given: 3 Thanked 26 times in 26 posts
Location: India
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 1:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Agree with Bharat. IMO E too! What is the OA? _________________ Correct me If I am wrong
Regards,
Amitava |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raulverde Rising GMAT Star
Joined: 16 May 2007 Posts: 91
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 2 times in 2 posts
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
A.
The incidence of serious animal-induced allergies among current zoo
employees is lower than that among the general population.
**However, a zoo employee who develops a serious animal-induced allergy
is very likely to switch to some other occupation. **
OA please |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
magical cook GMAT Destroyer!
Joined: 30 Jul 2006 Posts: 484
Thanks given: 6 Thanked 1 times in 1 posts
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you, I was also thinkint between E and A but now when I think about it again, it should be E.
(sorry I dont have OA for this..) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
theroadrunnershow Just gettin' started!
Joined: 13 Dec 2007 Posts: 19
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 1 times in 1 posts
Test Date: march 3rd Target GMAT Score: 700
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Bharat wrote: | I believe the answer must be E.
Note that approx 30% zoo employees get the allergy & hence switch the jobs...thus they move to other jobs (or become the general population).
Just to add in filtering useful information, the given information never discusses about the pets (C) or higher/lower risk in other professions or general populations.
Let me know in case of any errors. |
how can you conclude that the answer is E when none of the facts mentioned say anything about the likelihood of normal people who spend a lot of time in zoos??
the passage only talks about the likelihood of zookeepers getting the allergies.. _________________ Abhishek sunku |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|