Historians of women

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 7:57 pm
Location: India
Thanked: 1 times

Historians of women

by YellowSapphire » Fri Jul 30, 2010 12:08 am
Source: OG

Historians of women's labor in the United States
at first largely disregarded the story of female service
workers - women earning wages in occupations
such as salesclerk, domestic servant, and office
secretary. These historians focused instead on factory
work, primarily because it seemed so different from
traditional, unpaid "women's work" in the home,
and because the underlying economic forces of
industrialism were presumed to be gender-blind
and hence emancipatory in effect. Unfortunately,
emancipation has been less profound than expected,
for not even industrial wage labor has escaped
continued GMAT segregation in the workplace.

To explain this unfinished revolution in the
status of women, historians have recently begun
to emphasize the way a prevailing definition of
femininity often determines the kinds of work
allocated to women, even when such allocation is
inappropriate to new conditions. For instance, early
textile-mill entrepreneurs, in justifying women's
employment in wage labor, made much of the
assumption that women were by nature skillful at
detailed tasks and patient in carrying out repetitive
chores; the mill owners thus imported into the
new industrial order hoary stereotypes associated
with the homemaking activities they presumed to
have been the purview of women. Because women

accepted the more unattractive new industrial tasks
more readily than did men, such jobs came to
be regarded as female jobs. And employers, who
assumed that women's "real" aspirations were for
marriage and family life, declined to pay women
wages commensurate with those of men. Thus many
lower-skilled, lower-paid, less secure jobs came to be
perceived as "female."

More remarkable than the original has been the
persistence of such GMAT segregation in twentiethcentury
industry. Once an occupation came to be
perceived as "female," employers showed surprisingly
little interest in changing that perception, even when
higher profits beckoned. And despite the urgent need
of the United States during the Second World War to
mobilize its human resources fully, job segregation
by GMAT characterized even the most important war
industries. Moreover, once the war ended, employers
quickly returned to men most of the "male" jobs that
women had been permitted to master.

Which of the following words best expresses the opinion of the author of the passage concerning the notion that women are more skillful than men in carrying out detailed tasks?

A: "patient" (line 23)
B: "repetitive" (line 23)
C: "hoary" (line 25)
D: "homemaking" (line 26)
E: "purview" (line 27)

How to answer this?
Yellow Sapphire

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 748
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:54 am
Thanked: 46 times
Followed by:3 members

by outreach » Fri Jul 30, 2010 2:34 am
except C all other viewpoints are given by employers
Is the answer C
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
General blog
https://amarnaik.wordpress.com
MBA blog
https://amarrnaik.blocked/

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 7:57 pm
Location: India
Thanked: 1 times

by YellowSapphire » Fri Jul 30, 2010 2:41 am
outreach wrote:except C all other viewpoints are given by employers
Is the answer C
Yes, Can you explain please?
Yellow Sapphire

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 7:57 pm
Location: India
Thanked: 1 times

by YellowSapphire » Thu Aug 19, 2010 8:48 am
anybody would like to try this.
Yellow Sapphire

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 3:13 am
Thanked: 3 times

by krishnakumarhod » Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:59 am
[quote="YellowSapphire"]Source: OG

Historians of women's labor in the United States
at first largely disregarded the story of female service
workers - women earning wages in occupations
such as salesclerk, domestic servant, and office
secretary. These historians focused instead on factory
work, primarily because it seemed so different from
traditional, unpaid "women's work" in the home,
and because the underlying economic forces of
industrialism were presumed to be gender-blind
and hence emancipatory in effect. Unfortunately,
emancipation has been less profound than expected,
for not even industrial wage labor has escaped
continued GMAT segregation in the workplace.

To explain this unfinished revolution in the
status of women, historians have recently begun
to emphasize the way a prevailing definition of
femininity often determines the kinds of work
allocated to women, even when such allocation is
inappropriate to new conditions. For instance, early
textile-mill entrepreneurs, in justifying women's
employment in wage labor, made much of the
assumption that women were by nature skillful at
[color=blue]

detailed tasks and patient in carrying out repetitive
chores; the mill owners thus imported into the
new industrial order hoary stereotypes associated
with the homemaking activities they presumed to
have been the purview of women. Because women

[/color]
accepted the more unattractive new industrial tasks
more readily than did men, such jobs came to
be regarded as female jobs. And employers, who
assumed that women's "real" aspirations were for
marriage and family life, declined to pay women
wages commensurate with those of men. Thus many
lower-skilled, lower-paid, less secure jobs came to be
perceived as "female."

More remarkable than the original has been the
persistence of such GMAT segregation in twentiethcentury
industry. Once an occupation came to be
perceived as "female," employers showed surprisingly
little interest in changing that perception, even when
higher profits beckoned. And despite the urgent need
of the United States during the Second World War to
mobilize its human resources fully, job segregation
by GMAT characterized even the most important war
industries. Moreover, once the war ended, employers
quickly returned to men most of the "male" jobs that
women had been permitted to master.


made much of the
assumption that women were by nature skillful at
detailed tasks and patient in carrying out repetitive
chores; the mill owners thus imported into the
new industrial order hoary stereotypes associated
with the homemaking activities they presumed to
have been the purview of women. Because women

Which of the following words best expresses the opinion of the author of the passage concerning the notion that women are more skillful than men in carrying out detailed tasks?

A: "patient" (line 23)-->repetitive tasks and detailed tasks are mentioned seperately so this applies totally to repetitive taks
B: "repetitive" (line 23)--> same as A
C: "hoary" (line 25)-->this shows wat the AUTHOR thinks.The keyword here is wat the author thinks.
'the mill owners thus imported into the
new industrial order hoary stereotypes associated
with the homemaking activities'
hoary --> the author thinks these acitivies are hoary
D: "homemaking" (line 26) -->This tells that activities are similar to homemaking
E: "purview" (line 27)-->seems to me like portfolio of women

How to answer this?[/quote]

Let me try an explantion.From OG what I understand is that
What does the [b]author[/b] think about the notion mentioned above

Lets just say I am talking about the movie inception
I say

The movie contains leonardo dicaprio and other actors in dream sequences,It also contains people dreaming within dreams.So Nolan was able to create awesome action sequences modeled to appear as incomplete in details as our dreams.

Now i am describing the above as "awesome" that is my opinion
If i write the same as

The movie contains leonardo dicaprio and other actors in dream sequences,It also contains people dreaming within dreams.So Nolan was able to create confusing action sequences modeled to appear as incomplete in details as our dreams.

The same sentence now i am saying the whole thing is confusing

Hope this helps