STD

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 5:40 pm
Thanked: 1 times

STD

by Jinglander » Tue Aug 10, 2010 7:14 am
Q: There is a set of consecutive even integers. What is the standard deviation of the set?
(1) There are 39 elements in the set.
(2) the mean of the set is 382.

Answer is a. Can Someone explain

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 7:09 am
Thanked: 49 times
Followed by:25 members

by chris@veritasprep » Tue Aug 10, 2010 7:50 am
hi jinglander,

this is a nice example of a statistics number properties question. for standard deviation, the number of terms in the set plays an important role in your ability to determine a value. in this problem, it is probably easier to start with the second statement as it is clearly insufficient.

(2) if the average of a set of consecutive even numbers is 382, it tells you that the set is evenly dispersed around 382 but you have no idea how many terms are in the set. For instance, the set could be {380, 382, 384} which would have a very small standard deviation, or the set could consist of 1001 consecutive even numbers with 382 as the middle term. Such a set would have a huge standard deviation as many terms would be very far from the mean. Not sufficient. Could be A,C,E.

(1) If you know that there are 39 terms in the set, this might appear at first glance to be insufficient. However, because the set consists of consecutive even numbers you can calculate the distances of each term from the mean (regardless of what that mean might be), which as you probably know is the key to determining standard deviation. Because there are an odd number of terms and you are dealing with an evenly spaced set, you know that the middle term is also the average (in all evenly spaced sets the mean = median). So you know that the middle term would have a difference of 0 from the mean. The two terms beside that in either direction would each of a distance 2 from mean, the next two terms would each have a difference of 4 from the mean, the next two would have a difference of 6 from the mean, and so forth. With this understanding, it is clear that you can determine how far each term is from the mean. If you know how far each term is from the mean, you can calculate the standard deviation and statement 1 alone is sufficient. Answer is A.

Also note on this problem that good data sufficiency strategy is key. Clearly, the intent of the test makers on this problem is for the test-taker to pick C, thinking that you need to actually know the mean. After getting it down to A and C, use your understanding of how standard deviation is calculated to avoid the trap of picking C. Hope this helps!
Chris Kane
GMAT Instructor
Veritas Prep

Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1893
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 11:48 pm
Thanked: 215 times
Followed by:7 members

by kvcpk » Tue Aug 10, 2010 9:23 am
Hi Chris,

Would it have mattered if the number of elements was 38 instead of 39?

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 7:09 am
Thanked: 49 times
Followed by:25 members

by chris@veritasprep » Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:03 am
hi kvcpk,

the number of terms would not have mattered except that the average in statement 2 would have to be an odd number (as you probably know in data sufficiency the two statements cannot contradict each other). if you have a set of consecutive even numbers then the average will be odd if there are an even number of terms. for instance in the set [2,4,6,8] the average would be 5. with statement 1 you could determine the standard deviation regardless of how many terms they give you - its just that statement 2's average has to reflect that accurately. hope that answers your question and if not let me know...
Chris Kane
GMAT Instructor
Veritas Prep

Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1893
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 11:48 pm
Thanked: 215 times
Followed by:7 members

by kvcpk » Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:09 am
chris@veritasprep wrote:hi kvcpk,

the number of terms would not have mattered except that the average in statement 2 would have to be an odd number (as you probably know in data sufficiency the two statements cannot contradict each other). if you have a set of consecutive even numbers then the average will be odd if there are an even number of terms. for instance in the set [2,4,6,8] the average would be 5. with statement 1 you could determine the standard deviation regardless of how many terms they give you - its just that statement 2's average has to reflect that accurately. hope that answers your question and if not let me know...
Thanks for your response Chris. I see what you are saying.

Other doubt I had was, If there is no use of statement 1, is it not a flaw in problem making?

In this case, statement1 was never needed to answer the question.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 7:31 am

by Asma77 » Sat Feb 07, 2015 2:58 pm
chris@veritasprep wrote:hi jinglander,

this is a nice example of a statistics number properties question. for standard deviation, the number of terms in the set plays an important role in your ability to determine a value. in this problem, it is probably easier to start with the second statement as it is clearly insufficient.

(2) if the average of a set of consecutive even numbers is 382, it tells you that the set is evenly dispersed around 382 but you have no idea how many terms are in the set. For instance, the set could be {380, 382, 384} which would have a very small standard deviation, or the set could consist of 1001 consecutive even numbers with 382 as the middle term. Such a set would have a huge standard deviation as many terms would be very far from the mean. Not sufficient. Could be A,C,E.

(1) If you know that there are 39 terms in the set, this might appear at first glance to be insufficient. However, because the set consists of consecutive even numbers you can calculate the distances of each term from the mean (regardless of what that mean might be), which as you probably know is the key to determining standard deviation. Because there are an odd number of terms and you are dealing with an evenly spaced set, you know that the middle term is also the average (in all evenly spaced sets the mean = median). So you know that the middle term would have a difference of 0 from the mean. The two terms beside that in either direction would each of a distance 2 from mean, the next two terms would each have a difference of 4 from the mean, the next two would have a difference of 6 from the mean, and so forth. With this understanding, it is clear that you can determine how far each term is from the mean. If you know how far each term is from the mean, you can calculate the standard deviation and statement 1 alone is sufficient. Answer is A.

Also note on this problem that good data sufficiency strategy is key. Clearly, the intent of the test makers on this problem is for the test-taker to pick C, thinking that you need to actually know the mean. After getting it down to A and C, use your understanding of how standard deviation is calculated to avoid the trap of picking C. Hope this helps!
What if the number of the element is even number does statement A still suff

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sat Feb 07, 2015 3:20 pm
Asma77 wrote: What if the number of the element is even number does statement A still suff
Yes, statement 1 would still be sufficient (for the same reasons)

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2095
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pm
Thanked: 1443 times
Followed by:247 members

by ceilidh.erickson » Sun Feb 08, 2015 12:04 pm
With standard deviation questions on the GMAT, remember that you are not expected to calculate standard deviation! The formula is far too complicated. Your task here is just to determine if it's calculable with the information given (by someone else, presumably with a calculator).

If we know that the set is evenly spaced, we know the relationship between each term. It wouldn't matter whether it was consecutive even integers, consecutive multiples of 7, etc. If we want to know the standard deviation of that set, we only need to know how many terms are in the set. We could then calculate how far each term is from the mean. It wouldn't matter what the mean was - it will always be halfway between our biggest and smallest term. This is true whether we have an even number of terms or an odd number of terms.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2095
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pm
Thanked: 1443 times
Followed by:247 members

by ceilidh.erickson » Sun Feb 08, 2015 6:00 pm
For more on how standard deviation is tested on the GMAT - what they expect you to know/calculate and what they don't - see here:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/standard-dev ... tml#724642
https://www.beatthegmat.com/call-for-hel ... tml#545420
https://www.beatthegmat.com/standard-dev ... tml#680908
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2630
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
Location: East Bay all the way
Thanked: 625 times
Followed by:119 members
GMAT Score:780

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Mon Feb 09, 2015 12:11 am
Asma77 wrote:What if the number of the element is even number does statement A still suff
Yes, as long as you know what that even number is. For instance, if S1 said "There are 6 terms in the set", this would be enough (at least so long as we still know that the terms are consecutive even integers).

If S1 said "the number of terms in the set is even", however, we'd be out of luck - we could have 2 terms or 2,000,000 terms, each of which would have its own distinct standard deviation.