8. Doctors generally agree that such factors as cigarette smoking, eating rich foods high in fats, and alcohol consumption not only do damage by themselves but also aggravate genetic predispositions toward certain diseases.
  (A) not only do damage by themselves but also aggravate
  (B) do damage by themselves but also are aggravating to
  (C) are damaging by themselves but also are aggravating
  (D) not only do damage by themselves, they are also aggravating to
  (E) are doing damage by themselves, and they are also aggravating
OA is A
idiom or paralism?
Doctors generally agree that such factors (source: sc1000)
This topic has expert replies
- fibbonnaci
- MBA Student
- Posts: 403
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 7:32 pm
- Thanked: 98 times
- Followed by:22 members
This tests Idiom. not only..but also
that being said, the elements inside should be parallel too.
for eg u cannot have an infinitive next to not only and a verb after but also.
U need to keep things parallel in an idiom too.
that being said, the elements inside should be parallel too.
for eg u cannot have an infinitive next to not only and a verb after but also.
U need to keep things parallel in an idiom too.
- thephoenix
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1560
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 2:38 am
- Thanked: 137 times
- Followed by:5 members
fx678 wrote:8. Doctors generally agree that such factors as cigarette smoking, eating rich foods high in fats, and alcohol consumption not only do damage by themselves but also aggravate genetic predispositions toward certain diseases.
  (A) not only do damage by themselves but also aggravate
correct
  (B) do damage by themselves but also are aggravating to
not llel and unidiomatic
  (C) are damaging by themselves but also are aggravating
unidiomatic
  (D) not only do damage by themselves, they are also aggravating to
unidiomatic
  (E) are doing damage by themselves, and they are also aggravating
doing damage is wordier .....they has no clear ref
OA is A
idiom or paralism?
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 1:02 am
- Location: Switzerland
- Thanked: 5 times
A) Doctors generally agree that such factors as cigarette smoking, eating rich foods high in fats, and alcohol consumption not only do damage by themselves but also aggravate genetic predispositions toward certain disease.
Shouldn't the three elements
cigarette smoking
eating rich foods
alcohol consumption
be parallel? I think they aren't? shouldn't it be e.g. "eating of rich foods" so that the expression acts as a noun?
thx
Shouldn't the three elements
cigarette smoking
eating rich foods
alcohol consumption
be parallel? I think they aren't? shouldn't it be e.g. "eating of rich foods" so that the expression acts as a noun?
thx
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 8:24 am
- Thanked: 2 times
- GMAT Score:590
fx678 wrote:8. Doctors generally agree that such factors as cigarette smoking, eating rich foods high in fats, and alcohol consumption not only do damage by themselves but also aggravate genetic predispositions toward certain diseases.
  (A) not only do damage by themselves but also aggravate
  (B) do damage by themselves but also are aggravating to
  (C) are damaging by themselves but also are aggravating
  (D) not only do damage by themselves, they are also aggravating to
  (E) are doing damage by themselves, and they are also aggravating
OA is A
idiom or paralism?
Hi guys, I have a question about the firstly non-underlined part of the sentence, i.e. "such factors as cigarette smoking, eating rich foods high in fats, and alcohol consumption".
Is the parallelism among a complex gerund (cigarette smoking), a simple gerund (eating rich foods high in fats), and an action noun (alcohol consumption) correct?
As far as I know only a complex gerund can be parallel to an action noun. Hence either the sentence is incorrect or "eating rich foods ... " is a complex gerund.
Help me please.
Note: definition of complex and simple gerund is explained in MGMAT sentence correction book.
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2015 2:27 pm
- Followed by:8 members
Hello Everyone!
This looks like a great example of a question that deals with both idiom structures and parallelism! To start, here is the original question, with major differences between the options highlighted in orange:
Doctors generally agree that such factors as cigarette smoking, eating rich foods high in fats, and alcohol consumption not only do damage by themselves but also aggravate genetic predispositions toward certain diseases.
(A) not only do damage by themselves but also aggravate
(B) do damage by themselves but also are aggravating to
(C) are damaging by themselves but also are aggravating
(D) not only do damage by themselves, they are also aggravating to
(E) are doing damage by themselves, and they are also aggravating
After a quick glance over the options, there are 2 main things we can focus on:
1. Parallelism: damage/aggravate & damaging/aggravating
2. Idiom Structure: not only X, but also Y
Let's start with #1 on our list: parallelism. No matter which structure you end up using later on, both verbs need to be written using the same structure. Parallel structure is clearer, easier to read, and looks more professional - all things the GMAT loves! Here's how each option holds up:
(A) not only do damage by themselves but also aggravate
(B) do damage by themselves but also are aggravating to
(C) are damaging by themselves but also are aggravating
(D) not only do damage by themselves, they are also aggravating to
(E) are doing damage by themselves, and they are also aggravating
We can eliminate options B, D, & E because the verbs they use aren't parallel. Now, let's focus on #2 on our list: idiom structure. The idiom structure we're using here should look like this:
not only X but also Y
Let's see how each option handles this:
(A) not only do damage by themselves but also aggravate
This is CORRECT! It follows the "not only X but also Y" idiom structure, and both X and Y are written using parallel structure!
(C) are damaging by themselves but also are aggravating
This is INCORRECT because it doesn't use the "not only X but also Y" structure. It's missing the "not only" part. You could fix this by replacing the "but also" with "and" to make it clearer for readers.
There you go - option A was the correct choice all along!
Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.
This looks like a great example of a question that deals with both idiom structures and parallelism! To start, here is the original question, with major differences between the options highlighted in orange:
Doctors generally agree that such factors as cigarette smoking, eating rich foods high in fats, and alcohol consumption not only do damage by themselves but also aggravate genetic predispositions toward certain diseases.
(A) not only do damage by themselves but also aggravate
(B) do damage by themselves but also are aggravating to
(C) are damaging by themselves but also are aggravating
(D) not only do damage by themselves, they are also aggravating to
(E) are doing damage by themselves, and they are also aggravating
After a quick glance over the options, there are 2 main things we can focus on:
1. Parallelism: damage/aggravate & damaging/aggravating
2. Idiom Structure: not only X, but also Y
Let's start with #1 on our list: parallelism. No matter which structure you end up using later on, both verbs need to be written using the same structure. Parallel structure is clearer, easier to read, and looks more professional - all things the GMAT loves! Here's how each option holds up:
(A) not only do damage by themselves but also aggravate
(B) do damage by themselves but also are aggravating to
(C) are damaging by themselves but also are aggravating
(D) not only do damage by themselves, they are also aggravating to
(E) are doing damage by themselves, and they are also aggravating
We can eliminate options B, D, & E because the verbs they use aren't parallel. Now, let's focus on #2 on our list: idiom structure. The idiom structure we're using here should look like this:
not only X but also Y
Let's see how each option handles this:
(A) not only do damage by themselves but also aggravate
This is CORRECT! It follows the "not only X but also Y" idiom structure, and both X and Y are written using parallel structure!
(C) are damaging by themselves but also are aggravating
This is INCORRECT because it doesn't use the "not only X but also Y" structure. It's missing the "not only" part. You could fix this by replacing the "but also" with "and" to make it clearer for readers.
There you go - option A was the correct choice all along!
Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.