BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

GMATPrep - Marbles

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 12:17 am

GMATPrep - Marbles

by badri077 » Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:28 am
A question from GMATPrep.

A certain jar contains only b black marbles, w white marbles, and r red marbles. If one marble is to be chosen at random from the jar, is the probability that the marble chosen will be red greater than the probability that the marble chosen will be white ?

1) r/(b+w) > w/(b+r)
2) b-w >r

I'll post the answer after a few repplies.
Hope one of you can help me out here.

Thnx,
-B
Top
Source: — Data Sufficiency |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 460
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 7:42 am
Thanked: 27 times

by samirpandeyit62 » Sun Sep 16, 2007 2:15 am
Answer should be A

Q asks "is the probability that the marble chosen will be red greater than the probability that the marble chosen will be white ? "

this is possible only if r>w

stm1 :
r/(b+w) > w/(b+r)

i.e. r(b + r) > w (b + w)

now since b is same(constant) in both expressions so r>w to make the expression true

hence SUFF

stmt 2: b-w >r
this would be possible for both the cases r>w & w>r

i.e b =20 ,w =14 ,r =5

& b=10, w =2 & r = 6

so Insuff
Regards
Samir
Top
User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 12:17 am

Re:

by badri077 » Sun Sep 16, 2007 9:52 am
Thanks.
The Ans is A.

So is brute force substitution the thumb for most such problems ? I was pretty pressed for time, tried a few values and couldn't get it right and moved on..

-B
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 137
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 9:50 pm
Location: Chicago
Thanked: 1 times

by [email protected] » Mon Sep 17, 2007 4:29 pm
I did this way:
the prob of taking red ball out = r/b+w+r
for white ball = w/b+w+r
the question is whether r/b+w+r > w/b+w+r
or we have to find whether r > w
According to 1
r/(b+w) > w/(b+r)
Add 1 to both sides
this makes r+b+w/b+w>r+b+w/b+r
this givesb+r > b+w which means r > w SUFF
2.b - w > r
here we don't know if w>r or w<r
hence A
Top
User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 12:17 am

thanks

by badri077 » Mon Sep 17, 2007 9:05 pm
nice trick! Thanks for the explanation!

-B
Top
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 6:22 am

by karthick451 » Fri Sep 21, 2007 7:09 am
one more shot,

we need to prove

r/(r+b+w) > b/(r+b+w)

cross multiplying

= r^2 + br+wr > wr+bw+w^2
= r^2+br > bw+ w^2
= r/(b+w) > w/(b+r)

which is the given first condition
hence A is suff.

b is not suff because, b>r+w is given, but it doesnt say anything about r and w.
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1