| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
badri077 Just gettin' started!

Joined: 22 Jun 2007 Posts: 25
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:28 am Post subject: GMATPrep - Marbles |
|
|
A question from GMATPrep.
A certain jar contains only b black marbles, w white marbles, and r red marbles. If one marble is to be chosen at random from the jar, is the probability that the marble chosen will be red greater than the probability that the marble chosen will be white ?
1) r/(b+w) > w/(b+r)
2) b-w >r
I'll post the answer after a few repplies.
Hope one of you can help me out here.
Thnx,
-B |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
samirpandeyit62 GMAT Destroyer!
Joined: 25 Mar 2007 Posts: 460
Thanks given: 1 Thanked 23 times in 23 posts
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 2:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Answer should be A
Q asks "is the probability that the marble chosen will be red greater than the probability that the marble chosen will be white ? "
this is possible only if r>w
stm1 :
r/(b+w) > w/(b+r)
i.e. r(b + r) > w (b + w)
now since b is same(constant) in both expressions so r>w to make the expression true
hence SUFF
stmt 2: b-w >r
this would be possible for both the cases r>w & w>r
i.e b =20 ,w =14 ,r =5
& b=10, w =2 & r = 6
so Insuff _________________ Regards
Samir |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
badri077 Just gettin' started!

Joined: 22 Jun 2007 Posts: 25
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 9:52 am Post subject: Re: |
|
|
Thanks.
The Ans is A.
So is brute force substitution the thumb for most such problems ? I was pretty pressed for time, tried a few values and couldn't get it right and moved on..
-B |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
saurabh_1922@yahoo.co.in Really wants to Beat The GMAT!
Joined: 29 Mar 2007 Posts: 137
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
Location: Chicago
|
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 4:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I did this way:
the prob of taking red ball out = r/b+w+r
for white ball = w/b+w+r
the question is whether r/b+w+r > w/b+w+r
or we have to find whether r > w
According to 1
r/(b+w) > w/(b+r)
Add 1 to both sides
this makes r+b+w/b+w>r+b+w/b+r
this givesb+r > b+w which means r > w SUFF
2.b - w > r
here we don't know if w>r or w<r
hence A |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
badri077 Just gettin' started!

Joined: 22 Jun 2007 Posts: 25
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
|
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 9:05 pm Post subject: thanks |
|
|
nice trick! Thanks for the explanation!
-B |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
karthick451 Just gettin' started!
Joined: 02 Jul 2007 Posts: 24
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
|
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2007 7:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
one more shot,
we need to prove
r/(r+b+w) > b/(r+b+w)
cross multiplying
= r^2 + br+wr > wr+bw+w^2
= r^2+br > bw+ w^2
= r/(b+w) > w/(b+r)
which is the given first condition
hence A is suff.
b is not suff because, b>r+w is given, but it doesnt say anything about r and w. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|