prep question

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 141
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:24 pm
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

prep question

by jamesk486 » Fri May 18, 2007 4:31 am
Ornithologist: The curvature of the claws of modern tree-dwelling birds enables them to perch in trees. The claws of Archeopteryx, the earlies known birdlike creature, show similar curvature that must have enabled the creature to perch on tree limbs. Therefore, Archeopteryx was probably a tree-dwelling creature.

Paleontologist: No, the ability to perch in trees is not good evidence that Archeopteryx was a tree-dwelling bird.Chickens also spend time perched in trees, yet chickens are primarily ground-dwelling.
  

1. Which of the following is an ssumption on which the orithnologist's reasoning depends on?
(A) Modern tree-dwelling birds are the direct descendants of Archeopteryx.
(B) Archeopteryx made use of the curvature of its claws.
(C) There have never been tree-dwelling birds without curved claws.
(D) Archeopteryx was in fact the earliest birdlike creature.
(E) The curvature of the claws is the only available evidence for the claim that Archeopteryx was tree-dwelling.

2.
In responding to the ornithologist’s hypothesis that Archeopteryx was tree-dwelling, the paleontologist
  
(A) questions the qualifications of the ornithologist to evaluate the evidence
(B) denies the truth of the claims the ornithologist makes in support of the hypothesis
(C) uses a parallel case to illustrate a weakness in the ornithologist’s argument
(D) shows that the hypothesis contradicts one of the pieces of evidence used to support it
(E) provides additional evidence to support the ornithologist’s argument
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 62
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 12:00 am

by vanesslondon » Mon May 21, 2007 3:10 pm
I think the answers are B and C

If they didn't use their claws then the argument falls apart.

The respondent gives a counterexample... :)

User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 789
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:51 pm
Location: Silicon valley, California
Thanked: 30 times
Followed by:1 members

Re: prep question

by jayhawk2001 » Mon May 21, 2007 9:13 pm
jamesk486 wrote:Ornithologist: The curvature of the claws of modern tree-dwelling birds enables them to perch in trees. The claws of Archeopteryx, the earlies known birdlike creature, show similar curvature that must have enabled the creature to perch on tree limbs. Therefore, Archeopteryx was probably a tree-dwelling creature.

Paleontologist: No, the ability to perch in trees is not good evidence that Archeopteryx was a tree-dwelling bird.Chickens also spend time perched in trees, yet chickens are primarily ground-dwelling.
  

1. Which of the following is an ssumption on which the orithnologist's reasoning depends on?
(A) Modern tree-dwelling birds are the direct descendants of Archeopteryx.
(B) Archeopteryx made use of the curvature of its claws.
(C) There have never been tree-dwelling birds without curved claws.
(D) Archeopteryx was in fact the earliest birdlike creature.
(E) The curvature of the claws is the only available evidence for the claim that Archeopteryx was tree-dwelling.
Vote for B.

A, D and E are out of scope. C takes the argument too far.
jamesk486 wrote: 2.
In responding to the ornithologist’s hypothesis that Archeopteryx was tree-dwelling, the paleontologist
  
(A) questions the qualifications of the ornithologist to evaluate the evidence
(B) denies the truth of the claims the ornithologist makes in support of the hypothesis
(C) uses a parallel case to illustrate a weakness in the ornithologist’s argument
(D) shows that the hypothesis contradicts one of the pieces of evidence used to support it
(E) provides additional evidence to support the ornithologist’s argument
Vote for C.

All other options are untrue. A is out of scope.

Legendary Member
Posts: 559
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:29 am
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:2 members

by Cybermusings » Thu May 24, 2007 4:23 am
I would go with B for the first one and C for the second one....

B - The ornithologiost conveniently assumes that birds with a curvature in their claws use the same to perch trees.

C - Clearly because he cites a parallel case wherein the chicken has a curvature in its claws but still doesnt use it to perch trees

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 197
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 4:03 am

by nicolette » Tue May 03, 2016 2:59 am
ANswer B seems to be logical one out of other answer choices.