DS question

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 55
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 6:25 am
Location: MA
Thanked: 1 times

DS question

by bww » Sat May 12, 2007 4:27 pm
22. A jewelry dealer initially offered a bracelet for sale at an asking price that would give a profit to the dealer of 40 percent of the original cost. What was the original cost of the bracelet?

(1) After reducing this asking price by 10 percent, the jewelry dealer sold the bracelet at a profit of $403.
(2) The jewelry dealer sold the bracelet for $1,953.

Answer key says A. I thought it was D.

Let n=original selling price

1) 1.4n-.10(1.4n)=403+n sufficient
2) 1953=1.4n sufficient

Is it A b/c the question implies the dealer didn't sell the bracelet for what he initially asked (hence the use of word "initially" in the question)???

Thx

User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 789
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:51 pm
Location: Silicon valley, California
Thanked: 30 times
Followed by:1 members

Re: DS question

by jayhawk2001 » Sat May 12, 2007 11:06 pm
bww wrote:22. A jewelry dealer initially offered a bracelet for sale at an asking price that would give a profit to the dealer of 40 percent of the original cost. What was the original cost of the bracelet?

(1) After reducing this asking price by 10 percent, the jewelry dealer sold the bracelet at a profit of $403.
(2) The jewelry dealer sold the bracelet for $1,953.

Answer key says A. I thought it was D.

Let n=original selling price

1) 1.4n-.10(1.4n)=403+n sufficient
2) 1953=1.4n sufficient

Is it A b/c the question implies the dealer didn't sell the bracelet for what he initially asked (hence the use of word "initially" in the question)???

Thx
Yeah, the only reason why B is insufficient is if the price at which the
bracelet was "sold" was not the same as the "asking" price.

Its rather odd that they would test something like this in a quants
question.