Points J (3, 1) and K (– 1, – 3) are two vertices of an

This topic has expert replies

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 768
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 4:18 pm
Location: Berkeley, CA
Thanked: 387 times
Followed by:140 members
Points J (3, 1) and K (- 1, - 3) are two vertices of an isosceles triangle. If L is the third vertex and has a y-coordinate of 6, what is the x-coordinate of L?
(A) -3
(B) -4
(C) -5
(D) -6
(E) -7


For a collection of Coordinate Geometry practice problems, as well as for the OA & OE of this particular problem, see:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2014/gmat-prac ... -geometry/

Mike :-)
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
https://gmat.magoosh.com/

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1100
Joined: Sat May 10, 2014 11:34 pm
Location: New Delhi, India
Thanked: 205 times
Followed by:24 members

by GMATinsight » Wed Dec 10, 2014 3:07 am
Mike@Magoosh wrote:Points J (3, 1) and K (- 1, - 3) are two vertices of an isosceles triangle. If L is the third vertex and has a y-coordinate of 6, what is the x-coordinate of L?
(A) -3
(B) -4
(C) -5
(D) -6
(E) -7

Answer: Option D
Attachments
12.jpg
"GMATinsight"Bhoopendra Singh & Sushma Jha
Most Comprehensive and Affordable Video Course 2000+ CONCEPT Videos and Video Solutions
Whatsapp/Mobile: +91-9999687183 l [email protected]
Contact for One-on-One FREE ONLINE DEMO Class Call/e-mail
Most Efficient and affordable One-On-One Private tutoring fee - US$40-50 per hour

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 447
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 7:25 am
Thanked: 25 times
Followed by:1 members

by Mathsbuddy » Wed Dec 10, 2014 7:27 am
Upon visualising the given coordinates it is easy (and fast) to realise that the triangle is symmetrical about the line y = -x. Therefore, if the x co-ordinate of the third vertx is 6, then the y co-ordinate must be -6.
No need for any trig or Pythagoras.

User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 10:04 am

by ahmedshafea » Wed Aug 30, 2017 12:30 pm
Is the above reply a correct solution? If not could one explain the steps please

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2630
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
Location: East Bay all the way
Thanked: 625 times
Followed by:119 members
GMAT Score:780

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Wed Aug 30, 2017 6:00 pm
ahmedshafea wrote:Is the above reply a correct solution? If not could one explain the steps please
Pretty much. (3, 1) and (-1, -3) are equidistant from (2, -2), and from there the solution follows. (You could also treat (2, -2) as the midpoint of the base, then work with isosceles properties.)