Welcome! Check out our free B-School Guides to learn how you compare with other applicants.
Login or Register

Please review my essay. Thanks!!

This topic has 1 member reply

Grade:

1
 
0% (0 votes)
2
 
0% (0 votes)
3
 
0% (0 votes)
4
 
100% (1 votes)
5
 
0% (0 votes)
6
 
0% (0 votes)
mg123 Just gettin' started! Default Avatar
Joined
29 May 2008
Posted:
3 messages
Please review my essay. Thanks!! Post Tue Aug 05, 2008 1:58 am
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    Seniority (years of service) should not be the basis of employee compensation. Employees should be promoted and given raises solely on the basis of their work performance and merit. That is a better way to encourage high productivity.

    Discuss the extent to which...

    My response:

    The question whether to compensate workers according to their work performance and merit rather then their seniority has some argument supporting each side. In this essay I will argue in favor of compensating an employee solely on the basis of his work performance and merit.

    First, when the management promotes workers according to their productivity, it send a clear message to all the employees that one's way to be promoted in the company is for him to be productive and to do well in all of his assignments. This will encourage greater productivity among the workers who will see that their their hard work carries fruit. Moreover, this kind of compensation should not heart the senior workers as they should have an easier way of achieving better accomplishments since they have more experience.

    Second, it is only logical that a raise would be given to a worker whose work contributed to the company's performance. When the work done by an employee brings to greater earnings to the company it makes sense to share some of those earnings with him.

    Third, the alternative, which some may propose, to compensate workers based on their seniority, has some pretty serious downsides. For example, a worker that has been working in the organization for a long period of time, could stop caring about his performance and not work hard, as his salary raise is due anyhow, solely because he has been around long enough. Furthermore, promoting such a worker, who had stopped working hard or simply is not as skilled as other less senior employees, would cause a situation where the company has less skilled workers in crutial junctions along the organization's hierarchy tree.

    In conclusion, there are more arguments in favor of the argument shown above than there are against it, therefore it would make a better choice for companies facing such a dilemma.

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
    VP_Jim GMAT Instructor Default Avatar
    Joined
    01 May 2008
    Posted:
    1223 messages
    Followed by:
    10 members
    Thanked:
    183 times
    Post Sun Aug 10, 2008 10:10 am
    Your writing is good and you make some good points, but make sure you back up those points with specific, real world examples. Good examples include things such as countries, people, works of literature, events in history, etc. Avoid general or hypothetical examples.

    I'll give you a 4.

    _________________
    Jim S. | GMAT Instructor | Veritas Prep

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 j_shreyans 54 topics
    2 aditya8062 12 topics
    3 Rastis 9 topics
    4 RiyaR 9 topics
    5 vincenm 8 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    132 posts
    2 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    120 posts
    3 image description CriticalSquareMBA

    Critical Square

    38 posts
    4 image description Matt@VeritasPrep

    Veritas Prep

    31 posts
    5 image description David@VeritasPrep

    Veritas Prep

    30 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts