Please review my essay. Thanks!!

[This topic has 1 member reply]
Free $100 Amazon.com Gift Card - Buy a GMAT course using a Beat The GMAT discount code between Mar 8-22 and get a $100 Amazon.com Gift Card. Learn more!
Post New Topic   Post Reply


Grade:
1
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
2
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
3
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
4
100%
 100%  [ 1 ]
5
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
6
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Total Votes : 1

mg123
Just gettin' started!

Default Avatar

Joined: 30 May 2008
Posts: 3

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts

Topic: Please review my essay. Thanks!!
PostTue Aug 05, 2008 2:58 am

Elapsed Time:
00:00
Lap   Why a timer is critical to improving your score

Seniority (years of service) should not be the basis of employee compensation. Employees should be promoted and given raises solely on the basis of their work performance and merit. That is a better way to encourage high productivity.

Discuss the extent to which...

My response:

The question whether to compensate workers according to their work performance and merit rather then their seniority has some argument supporting each side. In this essay I will argue in favor of compensating an employee solely on the basis of his work performance and merit.

First, when the management promotes workers according to their productivity, it send a clear message to all the employees that one's way to be promoted in the company is for him to be productive and to do well in all of his assignments. This will encourage greater productivity among the workers who will see that their their hard work carries fruit. Moreover, this kind of compensation should not heart the senior workers as they should have an easier way of achieving better accomplishments since they have more experience.

Second, it is only logical that a raise would be given to a worker whose work contributed to the company's performance. When the work done by an employee brings to greater earnings to the company it makes sense to share some of those earnings with him.

Third, the alternative, which some may propose, to compensate workers based on their seniority, has some pretty serious downsides. For example, a worker that has been working in the organization for a long period of time, could stop caring about his performance and not work hard, as his salary raise is due anyhow, solely because he has been around long enough. Furthermore, promoting such a worker, who had stopped working hard or simply is not as skilled as other less senior employees, would cause a situation where the company has less skilled workers in crutial junctions along the organization's hierarchy tree.

In conclusion, there are more arguments in favor of the argument shown above than there are against it, therefore it would make a better choice for companies facing such a dilemma.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
VP_Jim
GMAT Instructor



Joined: 01 May 2008
Posts: 1223

Thanks given: 2
Thanked 180 times in 175 posts
Location: Los Angeles, CA

PostSun Aug 10, 2008 11:10 am

Your writing is good and you make some good points, but make sure you back up those points with specific, real world examples. Good examples include things such as countries, people, works of literature, events in history, etc. Avoid general or hypothetical examples.

I'll give you a 4.

_________________
Jim S. | GMAT Instructor | Veritas Prep
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post New Topic   Post Reply All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1
 
Most Active Members in Last 30 Days
1. harsh.champ 461 posts
2. shashank.ism 366 posts
3. thephoenix 323 posts
4. kstv 320 posts
5. gmatmachoman 261 posts
Most Active Experts in Last 30 Days
1. lunarpower
Manhattan GMAT Teacher
87 posts
2. Stuart Kovinsky
Kaplan GMAT Teacher
60 posts
3. Lisa Anderson
Stacy Blackman Consulting
54 posts
4. Testluv
Kaplan GMAT Teacher
49 posts
5. Bryant@VeritasPrep
Veritas Prep
41 posts