• Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    Varsity Tutors
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    PrepScholar GMAT
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    Target Test Prep
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    Kaplan Test Prep
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    Veritas Prep
  • Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    Economist Test Prep
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    EMPOWERgmat Slider

Please rate my AWA - ISSUE ESSAY

This topic has 2 member replies
asamanta Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Default Avatar
27 May 2008
55 messages
1 times

Please rate my AWA - ISSUE ESSAY

Post Fri Jun 20, 2008 10:02 pm
Elapsed Time: 00:00
    "Some people argue that those who do not send their children from to public schools should not have to fund these schools through taxes, since neither parents nor children benefit from thier schools. They ignore the face that everyone benefits from the strong economy that a well educated populace generates. "

    Which argument do you find more compelling, the case for forcing everyone to fund public schools or the opposing viewpoint? Explain your......


    Public schools should be funded by everyone regardless of whether their children attend those schools or not. These benefits are provided by the government for the overall improvement of the literacy of a nation's population. I stongly oppose the viewpoint that parents of children who do not benefit from these schools should not have to fund them.

    Firstly, people do not always know whether thier children would attend a Public school or a Private school. Suppose the financial status of a 'well to do' family changes and the family suddenly decides that thier children would need to enroll in a Public school. In this case although shoudl these people be barred from sending thier childrent to a Public school? The fees in such schools are largely subsidized in order to help those who can not afford high quality education.

    Secondly, although some people might not attend these schools they still might use the resources provided by Public schools. For example: Purdue University (a public school in the Mid-west) provides subsidized transportation for all West Lafayette residents regardless of whether the residents or the resident's children attend the university. There are many such university townships where the entire city benefits by resources provided by Public universities.

    Thus, it is imperative that longterm perspectives are taking into consideration while considering whether to stop funding from a certain section of the population. These schools aldready suffer from insufficient funding. Public schools foster the overall development of a nation's economy. They generate more than five time as many graduates as private schools do.

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
    VP_Jim GMAT Instructor Default Avatar
    01 May 2008
    1223 messages
    Followed by:
    13 members
    185 times
    Post Fri Jun 27, 2008 8:38 pm
    Hi asamanta,

    First of all, great job on picking a point of view and sticking with it! I particularly liked the example in your second body paragraph - a real-world, specific example (that is a proper noun, i.e, name, place, work of literature, etc.) is what you should try to come up with for every example.

    I'd recommend trying to come up with one other example; this will lengthen your essay and provide more support for your point of view. Also, try to take the time to proofread your essay before you submit it, and try not to use the words "I," "me," "we," and etc.

    I'd give this a 4. Hope this helps!

    Jim S. | GMAT Instructor | Veritas Prep

    mohitmahawar Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts Default Avatar
    07 Oct 2009
    3 messages
    Post Sun Oct 25, 2009 10:23 pm
    Public schools are funded by taxpayers money. Most of the public schools get huge governement
    grants to run thier operations in addition to a nominal fees that they charge to the students.

    Most governments around the world have a special tax to cover for the eduation needs of a country.
    In India, for instance, a special tax called 'education cess' is levied on sale of goods and services.
    India, a country with a population of 1.2 billion people cannot depend entirely on the private sector
    to produce employable people for the country. Therefore, public schools and colleges are
    required. A newspaper recently reported, that India is currently producing college graduates at a rate of 200,000 per year.
    Private sector, in many cases, lack the funding to open so many schools and colleges.
    Additionally, there are regions in the country which do not have adequate infrastructure facilities where private
    schools would not open of schools. Opening schools in such areas will result in losses or minimal returns on
    investments. Therefore, private schools do not invest in such areas. More schools and colleges result in better skilled labours.
    Businessess, agriculture activities carried out by literate people will result in enhancing the productivity. The per capital incomes as well the
    gross domestic product (GDP) of the country will increase.

    There are many sections of the society who are poor and therefore, can afford the huge fees charged by private
    schools. Obviously, government cannot control the private sector schools. But they certainly can influence
    the fee structure and other activities at public school and colleges. The only way government can open schools
    and provide subsidies is by implementing taxes on the society. It is ignorant of people to believe that parents who
    do not send thier children public school are unfairly taxed for funding the operations of such schools. The entire
    society benefits from the growth of the economy of any country.A concrete example, the premier management and technology institutes in India;
    Indian Institute of Management and Indian Institute of Technology are public sector entities. They are producing high calibre people
    who go on to run large multi-national corporations around the world benefiting the society as a whole.

    Government uses taxes as a source of revenue. A part of this revenue is to fund/ open/ subsidize public schools.
    Therefore, ensuring that its citizens are getting proper education through affordable institutions is
    important. Educated people become engineers, doctors, scientists, attorneys and improve the quality of life
    of the entire population of the country.

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 Vincen 132 topics
    2 lheiannie07 69 topics
    3 LUANDATO 61 topics
    4 Roland2rule 42 topics
    5 ardz24 40 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    134 posts
    2 image description EconomistGMATTutor

    The Economist GMAT Tutor

    117 posts
    3 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    117 posts
    4 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...


    109 posts
    5 image description DavidG@VeritasPrep

    Veritas Prep

    76 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts