• Magoosh
Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Veritas GMAT Class
Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 1 Hour Free
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Get 300+ Practice Questions

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
Register now and save up to $200 Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • 5-Day Free Trial 5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Trial & Practice Exam BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • 5 Day FREE Trial Study Smarter, Not Harder Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Practice Test & Review How would you score if you took the GMAT Available with Beat the GMAT members only code ## Please rate and advise (issue) tagged by: This topic has 2 member replies ### Please rate and advise (issue) 6 0% (0 votes) 5 0% (0 votes) 4 0% (0 votes) 3 0% (0 votes) 2 0% (0 votes) smehmood Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Joined 10 May 2008 Posted: 54 messages #### Please rate and advise (issue) Tue Aug 19, 2008 7:43 am Elapsed Time: 00:00 • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME]) "The presence of a competitor is always beneficial to a company. Competition forces a company to change itself in ways that improve its practices." Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading. --------- I strongly support the above argument that the presence of a competitor is always beneficial to a company because of the following reasons. First, competition "forces" the company to be cost effective. If a company is not as cost-effective as its competitor chances are the company won't survive for long. For example: if a company produces a car and it costs the company$10,000 to produce it whereas its competitor proudces almost the same type of car for $8000 and sales it for$10000 then the company will have to find innovative ways to cut costs and produce the car for about \$8000 otherwise it will loose to its competitor. Here, copmpetitor "forces" the company to find innovative ways to cut costs which is beneficial to the company.

Second, competition is exact opposite of monopoly. In a monopolistic society the company that has the monopoly will dictate the quality and price of its product.
Therefore it may not invest in technology that may improve the quality of its product and lower the price. Whereas in a competetive society it will invest in technology to improve the quality of its product and lower the price which is not only beneficial to the company but also to its consumers.

To conclude, presence of competitor is beneficial to the company as it forces a company to change itself in ways to improve its practises.

Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
VP_Jim GMAT Instructor
Joined
01 May 2008
Posted:
1223 messages
Followed by:
13 members
Thanked:
185 times
Wed Aug 20, 2008 9:14 am
Not bad, but your argument would be much stronger if you used specific examples rather than general/hypothetical examples. Rather than saying "a monopolisitc society", think of a real, specific company that had a monopoly that dictated the price and quality of its product.

Also, this essay is on the short side. Longer essays tend to score better. Make sure you write full paragraphs - I'm specifically referring to the intro and conclusion - and aim to have three body paragraphs.

Check out the sticky thread at the top of this forum to get some ideas and see some examples of strong-scoring essays.

I'll give you a 3 on this one.

_________________
Jim S. | GMAT Instructor | Veritas Prep

smehmood Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Joined
10 May 2008
Posted:
54 messages
Sat Aug 23, 2008 12:46 pm
Thanks Jim.

I will check the sticky notes.

In the body paragraphs, should I use First, Second, Third or Firstly, Secondly, Thirdly? Is this the best way to show sequence?
I also tend to repeat the argument (in question) in my intro and conclusion.
For eg: The argument that "X is the correct way.....e.t.c."
Is this right or is there a better way to refter to the argument in intro and conclusion rather than repeating it?

Thanks again.
M

### Best Conversation Starters

1 Vincen 180 topics
2 lheiannie07 65 topics
3 Roland2rule 49 topics
4 ardz24 44 topics
5 LUANDATO 23 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

### Most Active Experts

1 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

147 posts
2 Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

103 posts
3 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

102 posts
4 EconomistGMATTutor

The Economist GMAT Tutor

94 posts
5 DavidG@VeritasPrep

Veritas Prep

76 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts