• EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh

Please, kindly review my AWA

This topic has 0 member replies

Please, kindly review my AWA

Post Wed Aug 10, 2016 10:20 pm
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    Hello,

    I am posting below the essay on which I have worked.

    Prompt

    The following appeared in a memorandum from the head of a human resources department at a major automobile manufacturing company to the company's managers:

    “Studies have found that employees of not-for-profit organizations and charities are often more highly motivated than employees of for-profit corporations to perform well at work when their performance is not being monitored or evaluated. Interviews with employees of not-for-profit organizations suggest that the reason for their greater motivation is the belief that their work helps to improve society. Because they believe in the importance of their work, they have personal reasons to perform well, even when no financial reward is present. Thus, if our corporation began donating a significant portion of its profits to humanitarian causes, our employees’ motivation and productivity would increase substantially and our overall profits would increase as well.”

    My answer

    The argument that the company would increase its overall profits by increasing the motivation of its employees through humanitarian donations is flawed. The author doesn’t make explicit cause-effect relationship. Furthermore, the author ignores the apples-to-apples comparison principle. Finally, the author omits an important factor in his argument.

    Firstly, the author doesn’t make explicit cause-effect relationship between increase in motivation and increase in productivity, hence in profitability. Indeed, there is no evidence in the argument that more motivated employees will necessarily lead to more productive employees. Furthermore the company an automobile manufacturing company in which it is reasonable to think that most of the operations are automated.
    Secondly, the author ignores the apples-to-apples comparison principle when he superimposes the motivation of not-for-profit organizations’ employees to the motivation of for-profit companies’ employees. Indeed, giving donations to humanitarian causes will not lead to increase in motivation if the employees are not interested in the humanitarian causes.
    Finally, the author omits in his argument an important factor, which is the fact that the higher motivation of the employees happens when their performance is not being monitored or evaluated. But the argument fails to indicate whether the performance of the employees of the automobile company is being monitored or not. Accordingly, if the performance is already monitored, it is possible to assume that motivation won’t change.

    In conclusion, this argument could be strengthened if the author provided information substantiating the relationship between motivation and productivity. The argument could also be strengthened if the author provided more information concerning the situation of the employees (being monitored or not; interested in humanitarian causes or not). As it stands, however, the argument is flawed for the reasons indicated.

    Thank you !!

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 Vincen 152 topics
    2 lheiannie07 61 topics
    3 Roland2rule 49 topics
    4 ardz24 40 topics
    5 LUANDATO 32 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    141 posts
    2 image description EconomistGMATTutor

    The Economist GMAT Tutor

    107 posts
    3 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    106 posts
    4 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

    EMPOWERgmat

    104 posts
    5 image description Matt@VeritasPrep

    Veritas Prep

    76 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts