• Free Trial & Practice Exam
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 1 Hour Free
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Practice Test & Review
How would you score if you took the GMAT

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Veritas GMAT Class
Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Magoosh
Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5 Day FREE Trial
Study Smarter, Not Harder

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Get 300+ Practice Questions
25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
Register now and save up to \$200

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

## Please explain the answer

tagged by:

This topic has 1 member reply
gmatrant Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
03 Oct 2007
Posted:
416 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Upvotes:
10

#### Please explain the answer

Wed Nov 07, 2007 11:28 pm
The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the country was a failure in 1987. If the program had been
successful, the wholesale price of most illegal drugs would not have dropped substantially in 1987.
80. The argument in the passage depends on which of the following assumptions?
(A) The supply of illegal drugs dropped substantially in 1987.
(B) The price paid for most illegal drugs by the average consumer did not drop substantially in 1987.
(C) Domestic production of illegal drugs increased at a higher rate than did the entry of such drugs into the
country.
(D) The wholesale price of a few illegal drugs increased substantially in 1987.
(E) A drop in demand for most illegal drugs in 1987 was not the sole cause of the drop in their wholesale
price.

Can someone explain the answer. The answer is E. I couldn't understand the OG explanation.

Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
mayonnai5e Legendary Member
Joined
12 Dec 2006
Posted:
1018 messages
Followed by:
6 members
Upvotes:
86
Target GMAT Score:
720
Top Reply
Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:59 pm
gmatrant wrote:
The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the country was a failure in 1987. If the program had been
successful, the wholesale price of most illegal drugs would not have dropped substantially in 1987.
80. The argument in the passage depends on which of the following assumptions?
(A) The supply of illegal drugs dropped substantially in 1987.
(B) The price paid for most illegal drugs by the average consumer did not drop substantially in 1987.
(C) Domestic production of illegal drugs increased at a higher rate than did the entry of such drugs into the
country.
(D) The wholesale price of a few illegal drugs increased substantially in 1987.
(E) A drop in demand for most illegal drugs in 1987 was not the sole cause of the drop in their wholesale
price.

Can someone explain the answer. The answer is E. I couldn't understand the OG explanation.
Let's think about a normal market place.

Supply Side: When do prices go up? When supply is down. When do prices go down? When there is an oversupply and sellers reduce prices to get more business.

Buy Side: When do prices go up? When demand increases and buyers bid up the price. When do prices go down? When demand falls and buyers are less willing to pay a particular price.

"If the program had been successful, the wholesale price of most illegal drugs would not have dropped substantially in 1987."
--> This tells us that prices dropped substantially, which tells us something happened on the buy side or supply side to influence the price.

"The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the country was a failure in 1987."
--> The author is suggesting that the problem was an oversupply because unregulated entry would tend to allow lots of drugs to flow into the country
--> This means the author believes the issue was a supply side problem and not a buy side issue.

Choice E states the cause was not entirely due to the buy side, which is what the author is assuming here (otherwise the entire price drop could have been due to demand and had nothing to do with supply nor entry control).

_________________
http://www.beatthegmat.com/my-blog-errors-and-lessons-learned-t4899.html
550 =\ ...560 =\... 650 =) ...570 =( ...540 =*( ...680 =P ... 670 =T ...=T... 650 =T ...700 =) ..690 =) ...710 =D ...GMAT 720 DING!! ;D

Learn more about me

Thanked by: Cumulonimbus

### Best Conversation Starters

1 lheiannie07 116 topics
2 LUANDATO 67 topics
3 swerve 66 topics
4 ardz24 61 topics
5 AAPL 59 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

### Most Active Experts

1 Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

213 posts
2 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

177 posts
3 Jeff@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

168 posts
4 Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

133 posts
5 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

126 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts