Welcome! Check out our free B-School Guides to learn how you compare with other applicants.
Login or Register
 

Parallelism confusion

This topic has 1 expert reply and 0 member replies
topspin330 Just gettin' started! Default Avatar
Joined
11 Dec 2011
Posted:
16 messages
Parallelism confusion Post Mon Dec 19, 2011 2:23 pm
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    In the following sentence, how com there is no was before hiring and investing.

    The division WAS opening offices, hiring staff and investing in equipment.

    If that's correct, how come there's who before "genuinely cares" and "has the experience" in the following sentence?

    Voters want to elect a president WHO genuienly cares about heath care, the environment, and the travails of ordinary men and women, and WHO has the experience, wisdom, and strength of character required for the job.

    another eg: The consultant is looking for a cafe THAT has comfortable chairs and THAT provides free internet access.

    thanks.

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
    Post Mon Dec 19, 2011 8:40 pm
    In the first example the helping verb is distributed across the three verbs. So that the division "was doing" several things. It "was opening offices" it "was hiring staff" and it "was investing in equipment." So in this circumstance because the helping verb "was" is in common between all three you can just state it once and it is in common between all three verbs.

    In the second example you have the same thing: You have "A president who genuinely cares" about a list of things: "health care, the environment, and the travails..." so you can see that this works in just the same way as above. The reason that we have two "Who"s is that we know have a completely different list. Before we were talking about a president who genuinely cares about a list of things. Now we have a list of things that the person "has": experience, wisdom, and strength of character. Again after the initial "who has" we do no repeat that again.

    So your second example involves two separate versions of your first example.

    As to your final example, the first "that" corresponds with something the cafe "has" and the second corresponds with something the cafe "provides."

    Hope it helps

    _________________
    David Newland, JD, MA, MAE
    GMAT Instructor, Tutor, and Author
    Veritas Prep

    Thanked by: topspin330
    Access The Veritas Prep GMAT Simulatorâ„¢- for FREE! Veritas Prep has launched their new GMAT Practice Test. Sign up to access the realistic testing environment and challenge yourself today! Get Started Now.

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 varun289 42 topics
    2 greenwich 25 topics
    3 guerrero 20 topics
    4 sana.noor 19 topics
    5 killerdrummer 19 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    196 posts
    2 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    143 posts
    3 image description Anju@Gurome

    Gurome

    121 posts
    4 image description Jim@StratusPrep

    Stratus Prep

    86 posts
    5 image description David@VeritasPrep

    Veritas Prep

    41 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts