A majority of the international journalists surveyed view nuclear power stations as unsafe at present but that they will, or could, be made sufficiently safe in the future.
(A) that they will, or could,
(B) that they would, or could,
(C) they will be or could
(D) think that they will be or could
(E) think the power stations would or could
I chose answer E but answer seems given as D ... can someone validate this for me?
my reasoning:
A, B, C are not parallel --
"A majority of the international journalists surveyed" -- I see this Subject.
So, "Subject view..." would match with "Subject think..."
Now, between D and E:
in D, it's not clear what "they" is referring to.
E makes it clear by saying "think power station...."
Any input please?
5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP
Available with Beat the GMAT members only code
MORE DETAILS
parallel and pronoun issue
This topic has expert replies
-
gmatwarroom
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Sat May 05, 2012 11:27 am
- Thanked: 1 times
-
adthedaddy
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 167
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2012 8:35 pm
- Thanked: 39 times
- Followed by:3 members
Hi,
(D) as answer is correct. (E) cannot be the answer as the correct form will be "think THAT the power stations would BE or could".
A,B,C are not parallel so the remaining answer is (D).
Hope this helps.
(D) as answer is correct. (E) cannot be the answer as the correct form will be "think THAT the power stations would BE or could".
A,B,C are not parallel so the remaining answer is (D).
Hope this helps.
"Your time is limited, so don't waste it living someone else's life. Don't be trapped by dogma - which is living with the results of other people's thinking. Don't let the noise of others' opinions drown out your own inner voice. And most important, have the courage to follow your heart and intuition. They somehow already know what you truly want to become. Everything else is secondary" - Steve Jobs
-
srcc25anu
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 423
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 7:59 am
- Location: Seattle, WA
- Thanked: 86 times
- Followed by:2 members
IMO D
View and think are parallel. So that leaves A,B and C out.
Between D and E, i don't think we need to repeat power stations as the only intended referent of THEY is power stations.
View and think are parallel. So that leaves A,B and C out.
Between D and E, i don't think we need to repeat power stations as the only intended referent of THEY is power stations.
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
Tommy Wallach
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:58 am
- Location: New York City
- Thanked: 188 times
- Followed by:120 members
- GMAT Score:770
Hey All,
Good discussion here already. Just a bit more detail:
(B) Same as (A), also "Would" is incorrect. "Would" means there's something in the way of them being made safe (I would go to the store, if I had more money...), a meaning that isn't supported here.
(C) Same parallel error as (A).
(D) At first glance, it may look like the pronoun is wrong here, but the structure of the sentence gives it away. The other possible confusing antecedent (international journalists) are already present in this clause, through the parallelism:
...but [A majority of the international journalists] think that they will be or could...
(E) Makes the "would" error. Also, the GMAT uses THAT after the verb "think," though in everyday English it's often elided.
Hope that helps!
-t
Good discussion here already. Just a bit more detail:
(A) Missing verb "think" (there's no verb that would require "that"). Commas are weird.A majority of the international journalists surveyed view nuclear power stations as unsafe at present but that they will, or could, be made sufficiently safe in the future.
(A) that they will, or could,
(B) that they would, or could,
(C) they will be or could
(D) think that they will be or could
(E) think the power stations would or could
(B) Same as (A), also "Would" is incorrect. "Would" means there's something in the way of them being made safe (I would go to the store, if I had more money...), a meaning that isn't supported here.
(C) Same parallel error as (A).
(D) At first glance, it may look like the pronoun is wrong here, but the structure of the sentence gives it away. The other possible confusing antecedent (international journalists) are already present in this clause, through the parallelism:
...but [A majority of the international journalists] think that they will be or could...
(E) Makes the "would" error. Also, the GMAT uses THAT after the verb "think," though in everyday English it's often elided.
Hope that helps!
-t
Tommy Wallach, Company Expert
ManhattanGMAT
If you found this posting mega-helpful, feel free to thank and/or follow me!
ManhattanGMAT
If you found this posting mega-helpful, feel free to thank and/or follow me!
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
ceilidh.erickson
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pm
- Thanked: 1443 times
- Followed by:247 members
Try not to use pronoun ambiguity to eliminate answer choices, because the GMAT is not 100% consistent on this issue. Very occasionally, the GMAT will directly test pronoun ambiguity. More often than not, though, the GMAT will allow seeming ambiguity if the meaning is clear enough.
This question falls into the latter category. It wouldn't make much sense for journalists to be made safe, so "they" must refer to power stations. Now, I personally agree that it would be better not to use the pronoun here! And if we were asked to choose between:
think that they will be or could
think that the power stations will be or could
Clearly, we'd choose the second one. But since E had other grammar issues, we're allowed to ignore pronoun ambiguity in D.
So, always deal with all other grammar issues before looking at pronoun ambiguity! Here are some more posts on the subject:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/declaration- ... tml#539397
https://www.beatthegmat.com/bear-markets ... tml#549435
This question falls into the latter category. It wouldn't make much sense for journalists to be made safe, so "they" must refer to power stations. Now, I personally agree that it would be better not to use the pronoun here! And if we were asked to choose between:
think that they will be or could
think that the power stations will be or could
Clearly, we'd choose the second one. But since E had other grammar issues, we're allowed to ignore pronoun ambiguity in D.
So, always deal with all other grammar issues before looking at pronoun ambiguity! Here are some more posts on the subject:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/declaration- ... tml#539397
https://www.beatthegmat.com/bear-markets ... tml#549435
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
