• Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT

OPEC gone Crazy!

This topic has 14 member replies
fruti_yum Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
30 Jul 2009
Posted:
128 messages
Thanked:
1 times

OPEC gone Crazy!

Post Tue Aug 04, 2009 6:26 pm
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) had long been expected to announce a reduction in output to bolster sagging oil prices, but officials of the organization just recently announced that the group will pare daily production by 1.5 million barrels by the beginning of next year, but only if non-OPEC nations, including Norway, Mexico, and Russia, were to trim output by a total of 500,000 barrels a day
    A. year, but only if non-OPEC nations, including Norway, Mexico, and Russia, were to trim output
    B. year, but only if the output of non-OPEC nations, which includes Norway, Mexico, and Russia, is trimmed
    C. year only if the output of non-OPEC nations, including Norway, Mexico, and Russia, would be trimmed
    D. year only if non-OPEC nations, which includes Norway, Mexico, and Russia, were trimming output
    E. year only if non-OPEC nations, including Norway, Mexico, and Russia, trim output

    OA after some discussion!

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
    madhur_ahuja Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    02 May 2009
    Posted:
    435 messages
    Thanked:
    17 times
    Post Tue Aug 04, 2009 7:02 pm
    IMO E

    The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) had long been expected to announce a reduction in output to bolster sagging oil prices, but officials of the organization just recently announced that the group will pare daily production by 1.5 million barrels by the beginning of next year, but only if non-OPEC nations, including Norway, Mexico, and Russia, were to trim output by a total of 500,000 barrels a day
    A. year, but only if non-OPEC nations, including Norway, Mexico, and Russia, were to trim output
    B. year, but only if the output of non-OPEC nations, which includes Norway, Mexico, and Russia, is trimmed
    C. year only if the output of non-OPEC nations, including Norway, Mexico, and Russia, would be trimmed
    D. year only if non-OPEC nations, which includes Norway, Mexico, and Russia, were trimming output
    E. year only if non-OPEC nations, including Norway, Mexico, and Russia, trim output

    Shawshank Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    27 Jul 2009
    Posted:
    305 messages
    Thanked:
    10 times
    Post Tue Aug 04, 2009 10:35 pm
    IMO -- E

    _________________
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Shawshank Redemtion -- Hope is still alive ...

    viju9162 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
    Joined
    11 Jun 2007
    Posted:
    434 messages
    Thanked:
    6 times
    Target GMAT Score:
    750+
    GMAT Score:
    600
    Post Wed Aug 05, 2009 1:05 am
    Why not the answer "C"? if the output, ......, [then] would/were be trimmed

    _________________
    "Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group

    madhur_ahuja Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    02 May 2009
    Posted:
    435 messages
    Thanked:
    17 times
    Post Wed Aug 05, 2009 1:09 am
    viju9162 wrote:
    Why not the answer "C"? if the output, ......, [then] would/were be trimmed
    Acc. to MGMAT, construction involving if and would together is wrong.

    viju9162 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
    Joined
    11 Jun 2007
    Posted:
    434 messages
    Thanked:
    6 times
    Target GMAT Score:
    750+
    GMAT Score:
    600
    Post Wed Aug 05, 2009 1:23 am
    thanks Madhur.. So if ....[then] were is valid right? It is only with "would" is not possible..

    _________________
    "Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group

    madhur_ahuja Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    02 May 2009
    Posted:
    435 messages
    Thanked:
    17 times
    Post Wed Aug 05, 2009 1:33 am
    viju9162 wrote:
    thanks Madhur.. So if ....[then] were is valid right? It is only with "would" is not possible..
    Yes, it is valid. But it can be gramatically wrong according to statement.

    But If and would can never come together.

    vikram_k51 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    31 Jan 2009
    Posted:
    208 messages
    Thanked:
    2 times
    Post Wed Aug 05, 2009 8:44 am
    The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) had long been expected to announce a reduction in output to bolster sagging oil prices, but officials of the organization just recently announced that the group will pare daily production by 1.5 million barrels by the beginning of next year, but only if non-OPEC nations, including Norway, Mexico, and Russia, were to trim output by a total of 500,000 barrels a day
    A. year, but only if non-OPEC nations, including Norway, Mexico, and Russia, were to trim output
    B. year, but only if the output of non-OPEC nations, which includes Norway, Mexico, and Russia, is trimmed
    C. year only if the output of non-OPEC nations, including Norway, Mexico, and Russia, would be trimmed
    D. year only if non-OPEC nations, which includes Norway, Mexico, and Russia, were trimming output
    E. year only if non-OPEC nations, including Norway, Mexico, and Russia, trim output

    kc_raj Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    13 May 2009
    Posted:
    117 messages
    Thanked:
    5 times
    Test Date:
    July1st
    Target GMAT Score:
    750+
    Post Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:23 am
    iMHO A

    nothing wrong with A,

    Kebab Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    01 Mar 2009
    Posted:
    20 messages
    Target GMAT Score:
    600+
    Post Wed Aug 05, 2009 10:12 am
    kc_raj wrote:
    iMHO A

    nothing wrong with A,
    "if...were..." is used when people are talking about unreal situations.
    In our case trimming output by non-OPEC countries is real.

    rsadana1 GMAT Instructor
    Joined
    24 Jan 2009
    Posted:
    119 messages
    Followed by:
    9 members
    Thanked:
    16 times
    Post Wed Aug 05, 2009 11:39 am
    1)The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) had long been expected to announce a reduction {in output} to bolster sagging oil prices,
    2)but officials {of the organization} just recently announced
    3)that the group will pare daily production {by 1.5 million barrels} {by the beginning of next year},
    4)but only if non-OPEC nations, {including Norway, Mexico, and Russia,} were to trim output {by a total of 500,000 barrels a day}

    IMO Answer E
    Notice the sentence construction - group will pareif "non-OPEC nations do something"
    This is similar to the construction - if "something happens", then "something else will happen"

    Since the non-underlined sentence is future tense - "will pare", the underlined portion must include simple present in the "if" clause. And hence Choice E is correct "trim output"
    Why other choices are incorrect?
    Choice A - if ..were.., then ..will pare => which is incorrect. If were, then would. Also, but appears to be redundant with "if" already present to express the condition.
    Choice B - "is trimmed" - is passive construction. Should avoid passive construction since non-underlined portion is in active voice. "the group will pare.."
    Choice C - "would be trimmed" - is passive construction. Same reasoning as B. In addition, since the non-underlined sentence is future tense - "will pare", the underlined portion must include simple present in the "if" clause and not past tense.
    Choice D - "were trimming" - is incorrect since past tense is incorrect and furthermore continuous tense does not make sense in this context.

    Thanked by: CaptainM, gtr02, moosehead
    vcgmat Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    16 Feb 2009
    Posted:
    21 messages
    Post Wed Aug 05, 2009 1:13 pm
    Although im suspicious about "but only if ...", the last part (by a total of 500,000 barrels a day) of the sentence might be required ...
    Hence IMO ... A

    umaa Legendary Member Default Avatar
    Joined
    08 Jun 2008
    Posted:
    727 messages
    Followed by:
    1 members
    Thanked:
    8 times
    Test Date:
    TBD
    Target GMAT Score:
    740
    Post Wed Aug 05, 2009 4:12 pm
    IMO E.

    A and B - BUT ONLY - Wrong

    C - If and would are in the same clause. WRONG.

    D - WERE TRIMMING OUTPUT. There is no hypothetical situation here.

    E - CORRECT

    vivekagibm@gmail.com Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    18 Jul 2009
    Posted:
    27 messages
    Thanked:
    1 times
    Post Fri Aug 07, 2009 4:58 am
    nishatfarhat87@gmail.com Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
    Joined
    24 Jun 2012
    Posted:
    206 messages
    Followed by:
    3 members
    Thanked:
    5 times
    Post Sat Oct 08, 2016 9:02 am
    The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) had long been expected to announce a reduction in output to bolster sagging oil prices
    , but officials of the organization just recently announced that
    the group will pare daily production by 1.5 million barrels by the beginning of next year, but only if non-OPEC nations, including Norway, Mexico, and Russia, were to trim output by a total of 500,000 barrels a day

    The subject verb pairs have been highlighted. Now let's move to POE.
    A.year, but only if non-OPEC nations, including Norway, Mexico, and Russia, were to trim output - Comma + but here is connecting an indep clause with a dep clause. This is incorrect usage. That structure connects 2 indep clauses. The then clause uses future tense so we need present tense in the if clause.
    B.year, but only if the output of non-OPEC nations, which includes Norway, Mexico, and Russia, is trimmed - Same structural error with comma + but. Singular verb includes refers to plural subject nations.Is trimmed is past tense.
    C.year only if the output of non-OPEC nations, including Norway, Mexico, and Russia, would be trimmed - Would be trimmed is incorrect.
    D.year only if non-OPEC nations, which includes Norway, Mexico, and Russia, were trimming output - Were trimming is incorrect. Same verb pronoun antecedent incompatibility error as in B.
    E.year only if non-OPEC nations, including Norway, Mexico, and Russia, trim output - Correct.

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 Vincen 180 topics
    2 lheiannie07 61 topics
    3 Roland2rule 54 topics
    4 ardz24 44 topics
    5 VJesus12 14 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    155 posts
    2 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

    EMPOWERgmat

    105 posts
    3 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    101 posts
    4 image description Jay@ManhattanReview

    Manhattan Review

    82 posts
    5 image description Matt@VeritasPrep

    Veritas Prep

    80 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts