• Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep

One of the ironies of contemporary history

This topic has 1 expert reply and 2 member replies

One of the ironies of contemporary history

Post Fri Sep 22, 2017 1:29 pm
One of the ironies of contemporary history is that legitimate democratic processes have been exploited for the creation of anti-democratic regimes and when they promulgated and enforced laws denying the right to non-violent political opposition.

A. that legitimate democratic processes have been exploited for the creation of anti-democratic regimes and when they promulgated and enforced laws denying the right to non-violent political opposition

B. that legitimate democratic processes have been exploited for the creation of anti-democratic regimes and for the promulgation and enforcement of laws denying the right to non-violent political opposition

C. the exploitation of legitimate democratic processes to create anti-democratic regimes and the promulgation and enforcement of laws denying the right to non-violent political opposition

D. that legitimate democratic processes have been exploited for the creation of anti-democratic regimes as well as the promulgation and enforcing of laws denying the right to non-violent political opposition

E. how legitimate democratic processes have been exploited for the creation of anti-democratic regimes and their promulgating laws that deny the right to non-violent political opposition and enforcing them

What Option will give us the intended meaning? Please help me on this experts?

OA B

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
Post Wed Jan 10, 2018 12:20 am
EconomistGMATTutor wrote:
Hello!

This is an example of using parallel format to list two different effects or reasons for an action:

Action: democratic processes were exploited
Why were they exploited?:
FOR the creation of anti-democratic regimes
and
FOR the promulgation and enforcement of laws denying the right to non-violent political opposition

The problem with answer A is that instead of using "for," they use "when," which suggests the exploiting happened at the same time as the enforcement of laws - not as a later result of the exploitation. Therefore, answer B gives us the correct intended meaning.

I hope this helps! I'm available if you'd like any follow up.
Thanks a lot!

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
Post Wed Oct 25, 2017 3:04 pm
Hello!

This is an example of using parallel format to list two different effects or reasons for an action:

Action: democratic processes were exploited
Why were they exploited?:
FOR the creation of anti-democratic regimes
and
FOR the promulgation and enforcement of laws denying the right to non-violent political opposition

The problem with answer A is that instead of using "for," they use "when," which suggests the exploiting happened at the same time as the enforcement of laws - not as a later result of the exploitation. Therefore, answer B gives us the correct intended meaning.

I hope this helps! I'm available if you'd like any follow up.

_________________
GMAT Prep From The Economist
We offer 70+ point score improvement money back guarantee.
Our average student improves 98 points.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
Free 7-Day Test Prep with Economist GMAT Tutor - Receive free access to the top-rated GMAT prep course including a 1-on-1 strategy session, 2 full-length tests, and 5 ask-a-tutor messages. Get started now.
Post Mon Oct 16, 2017 6:50 am
Experts, I can not find the mistake in option A. Why it is wrong?

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag

Best Conversation Starters

1 Roland2rule 181 topics
2 lheiannie07 110 topics
3 ardz24 60 topics
4 LUANDATO 55 topics
5 swerve 52 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

Most Active Experts

1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

153 posts
2 image description GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

125 posts
3 image description Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

123 posts
4 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

111 posts
5 image description EconomistGMATTutor

The Economist GMAT Tutor

83 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts