• e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep

OG Verbal 2016-SC# 63

This topic has 5 expert replies and 8 member replies
ngk4mba3236 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
18 Mar 2016
Posted:
174 messages
Thanked:
1 times

OG Verbal 2016-SC# 63

Post Thu Apr 14, 2016 10:00 pm
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    Many kitchens today are equipped with high-speed electrical gadgets, such as blenders and food processors, which are able to inflict as serious injuries as those caused by an industrial wood-planing machine.

    (A) which are able to inflict as serious injuries as those
    (B) which can inflict serious injuries such as those
    (C) inflicting injuries as serious as that having been
    (D) capable to inflict injuries as serious as that
    (E) capable of inflicting injuries as serious as those

    OA: E

    hi experts,
    I'm lost between choice a & e. can you please share your analysis for this sc ?

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
    fabiocafarelli Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    09 Feb 2016
    Posted:
    105 messages
    Followed by:
    2 members
    Thanked:
    57 times
    Post Fri Apr 15, 2016 2:00 am
    Many kitchens today are equipped with high-speed electrical gadgets, such as blenders and food processors, which are able to inflict as serious injuries as those caused by an industrial wood-planing machine.

    (A) which are able to inflict as serious injuries as those
    (B) which can inflict serious injuries such as those
    (C) inflicting injuries as serious as that having been
    (D) capable to inflict injuries as serious as that
    (E) capable of inflicting injuries as serious as those

    1. Option A says that the gadgets in kitchens are ABLE to perform a certain action. In Sentence Correction, the verb TO BE ABLE and the noun ABILITY are used to refer only to living organisms. This would allow you to eliminate option A.

    2. Option A also uses the relative pronoun WHICH in apposition to BLENDERS AND FOOD PROCESSORS. It therefore refers to them. But these are merely EXAMPLES of the gadgets in question, and the intention of the sentence is to say that HIGH-SPEED ELECTRICAL GADGETS in general, and not merely the examples, can cause injuries. WHICH therefore confuses the meaning of the sentence.

    3. In option A you also have the structure AS SERIOUS INJURIES AS. But something is AS SERIOUS AS or AS INTERESTING AS or AS OLD AS something else: in such comparisons of equality, the noun or pronoun that is the first term of the comparison (INJURIES, in this case) must precede the phrase AS + ADJECTIVE + AS, and the second term of the comparison (THOSE, in this case) must follow it. in other words, a construction that inserts the adjective into the middle of the comparison, as this one does, is incorrect.

    4. Option E constructs the phrase correctly: INJURIES AS SERIOUS AS THOSE. It replaces ABLE with CAPABLE and uses the correct idiom: CAPABLE OF INFLICTING. And the absence of WHICH avoids the confusion created by that pronoun in option A.

    If you like this post, please click on the THANK icon.

    Try our online GMAT prep

    Thanked by: aflaam, joealam1
    aflaam Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    02 Jan 2016
    Posted:
    132 messages
    Followed by:
    1 members
    Thanked:
    4 times
    Post Mon Apr 18, 2016 2:36 pm
    CAN SOME ONE TELL ME WHY b IS WRONG?
    I thought in can vs capable split, can is given preference.

    Thanked by: Bivash
    fabiocafarelli Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    09 Feb 2016
    Posted:
    105 messages
    Followed by:
    2 members
    Thanked:
    57 times
    Post Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:31 am
    1. Option B is wrong because in the first place it changes the meaning of the given sentence: there, you have to observe that the intention is to make a comparison between the seriousness of injuries caused by kitchen gadgets and the seriousness of injuries caused by a particular machine. Nevertheless, in option B, the comparison disappears and instead you have an exemplification of certain kinds of injuries.

    2. Option B, like option A, uses the relative pronoun WHICH in apposition to BLENDERS AND FOOD PROCESSORS. It therefore refers to them. But these are merely EXAMPLES of the gadgets in question, and the intention of the sentence is to say that HIGH-SPEED ELECTRICAL GADGETS in general, and not merely the examples, can cause injuries. WHICH therefore confuses the meaning of the sentence.

    3. Note that there are no mistakes of a grammatical or idiomatic kind in option B. Its defects are all involved with the question of meaning.

    If you like this post, please click on the THANK icon.

    Try our online GMAT prep

    ngk4mba3236 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    18 Mar 2016
    Posted:
    174 messages
    Thanked:
    1 times
    Post Thu Apr 21, 2016 10:14 pm
    hi experts@gmat verbal,
    could you please share your analysis for this SC (and also please shed light on my concerns mentioned in the first post) ?

    p.s: gmatguru/david@veritas/rich/ceilidh - it'd great to hear your feedback on this guys! any other experts also feel free to share yours. thank you!

    Post Fri Apr 22, 2016 3:22 am
    ngk4mba3236 wrote:
    Many kitchens today are equipped with high-speed electrical gadgets, such as blenders and food processors, which are able to inflict as serious injuries as those caused by an industrial wood-planing machine.

    (A) which are able to inflict as serious injuries as those
    (B) which can inflict serious injuries such as those
    (C) inflicting injuries as serious as that having been
    (D) capable to inflict injuries as serious as that
    (E) capable of inflicting injuries as serious as those
    On the GMAT, which + PLURAL VERB must serve to refer to the NEAREST PRECEDING PLURAL NOUN.
    To my knowledge, no OA has deviated from this rule.
    A: food processors, which are able to inflict
    Here, which are (which + plural verb) seems to refer to food processors (the nearest preceding plural noun), implying that FOOD PROCESSORS are ABLE TO INFLICT injuries.
    The intended meaning is that a specific subset of GADGETS can cause injuries, as in the OA:
    Kitchens are equipped with high-speed electrical gadgets capable of inflicting injuries.
    Food processors are merely an EXAMPLE of this type of high-speed electrical gadget.
    Eliminate A.

    If the verb attributed to which can be singular or plural, the referent for which must be the NEAREST PRECEDING NOUN.
    To my knowledge, no OA has deviated from this rule.
    B: food processors, which can inflict
    Here, can inflict could be singular or plural.
    As a result, which can inflict seems to refer to food processors, implying that FOOD PROCESSORS CAN INFLICT injuries.
    The intended meaning is that a specific subset of GADGETS can cause injuries, as in the OA:
    Kitchens are equipped with high-speed electrical gadgets capable of inflicting injuries.
    Food processors are merely an EXAMPLE of this type of high-speed electrical gadget.
    Eliminate B.

    In C and D, that lacks a singular referent.
    Eliminate C and D.

    The correct answer is E.

    Other errors in A:

    On the GMAT, the words able and ability should not be ascribed to an inanimate object such as a food processor or a gadget.

    A: to inflict as serious injuries
    Here, the portion in red would be appropriate to convey that something is inflicted in the form of a serious injury, as follows:
    During the fight, John was able to inflict as serious injuries three very large gashes.
    Not the intended meaning.

    _________________
    Mitch Hunt
    GMAT Private Tutor
    GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
    If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Thank" icon.
    Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance.
    For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com.

    Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.
    ngk4mba3236 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    18 Mar 2016
    Posted:
    174 messages
    Thanked:
    1 times
    Post Fri Apr 22, 2016 7:55 am
    GMATGuruNY wrote:
    On the GMAT, the words able and ability should not be ascribed to an inanimate object such as a food processor or a gadget.
    is there any deviation of this rule on GMAT ?

    GMATGuruNY wrote:
    A: to inflict as serious injuries
    Here, the portion in red would be appropriate to convey that something is inflicted in the form of a serious injury, as follows:
    During the fight, John was able to inflict as serious injuries three very large gashes.
    Not the intended meaning.
    didn't get this explanation clearly...

    intended meaning is: kitchen gadgets cause serious injuries as those (re injuries) caused by an industrial wood-planing machine -- that means,injuries caused by these kitchen gadgets and by industrial machine are similar in terms of seriousness.

    so how this meaning is distorted by this particular phrase - inflict as serious injuries as those ?

    curious to hear your thoughts!

    Post Fri Apr 22, 2016 10:33 am
    ngk4mba3236 wrote:
    GMATGuruNY wrote:
    On the GMAT, the words able and ability should not be ascribed to an inanimate object such as a food processor or a gadget.
    is there any deviation of this rule on GMAT ?

    To my knowledge, the GMAT has never deviated from this rule.

    GMATGuruNY wrote:
    A: to inflict as serious injuries
    Here, the portion in red would be appropriate to convey that something is inflicted in the form of a serious injury, as follows:
    During the fight, John was able to inflict as serious injuries three very large gashes.
    Not the intended meaning.
    didn't get this explanation clearly...
    When as + NOUN PHRASE immediately follows a VERB FORM, it generally serves as an ADVERB modifying the preceding verb form.

    The girls want to work as free-lance writers.
    Here, as free-lance writers is an adverb modifying to work (the immediately preceding verb form).
    Question: HOW do the girls want to work?
    Answer: as free-lance writers.

    Two free tickets were offered as compensation.
    Here, as compensation is an adverb modifying were offered (the immediately preceding verb).
    Question: HOW were two free tickets offered?
    Answer: as compensation.

    Answer choice A implies the following:
    Food processors are able to inflict as serious injuries.
    Here, as serious injuries seems to be an ADVERB serving to modify to inflict (the immediately preceding verb form).
    Question: HOW are food processors able to inflict?
    Answer: as serious injuries.
    This meaning is nonsensical, implying that the usage of as serious injuries is incorrect.

    To convey the intended meaning, injuries must serve not as part of an adverb but as a DIRECT OBJECT, as in the OA:
    gadgets capable of inflicting injuries.
    Here, injuries serves not as part of an adverbial as-modifier but as the direct object of inflicting.
    Question: WHAT are gadgets capable of inflicting?
    Answer: They are capable of inflicting INJURIES.

    _________________
    Mitch Hunt
    GMAT Private Tutor
    GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
    If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Thank" icon.
    Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance.
    For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com.

    Thanked by: jain2016, ngk4mba3236, parry
    Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.
    ngk4mba3236 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    18 Mar 2016
    Posted:
    174 messages
    Thanked:
    1 times
    Post Sat Apr 23, 2016 10:30 am
    GMATGuruNY wrote:
    When as + NOUN PHRASE immediately follows a VERB FORM, it generally serves as an ADVERB modifying the preceding verb form.

    Answer choice A implies the following:
    Food processors are able to inflict as serious injuries.
    Here, as serious injuries seems to be an ADVERB serving to modify to inflict (the immediately preceding verb form).
    Question: HOW are food processors able to inflict?
    Answer: as serious injuries.
    This meaning is nonsensical, implying that the usage of as serious injuries is incorrect.
    gmatguru,
    can understand most of your earlier reply. just a quick clarification needed on the above quote:

    if we consider option A along with the rest of the sentence, then the structure evolves - "food processors...are able to inflict as serious injuries as those caused by...machine". so here, although as + NOUN PHRASE immediately follows a VERB FORM, the portion after "as + NOUN PHRASE" contains as + PRONOUN as part of the comparison depicted in this sc.

    so, not able to get how this complete structure -- VERB FORM + as + NOUN PHRASE + as + PRONOUN -- becomes incorrect! because in GMAT comparison , we get structure like as NOUN as NOUN/PRONOUN, I guess!

    can you please clarify ?

    Post Sat Apr 23, 2016 5:18 pm
    ngk4mba3236 wrote:
    GMATGuruNY wrote:
    When as + NOUN PHRASE immediately follows a VERB FORM, it generally serves as an ADVERB modifying the preceding verb form.

    Answer choice A implies the following:
    Food processors are able to inflict as serious injuries.
    Here, as serious injuries seems to be an ADVERB serving to modify to inflict (the immediately preceding verb form).
    Question: HOW are food processors able to inflict?
    Answer: as serious injuries.
    This meaning is nonsensical, implying that the usage of as serious injuries is incorrect.
    gmatguru,
    can understand most of your earlier reply. just a quick clarification needed on the above quote:

    if we consider option A along with the rest of the sentence, then the structure evolves - "food processors...are able to inflict as serious injuries as those caused by...machine". so here, although as + NOUN PHRASE immediately follows a VERB FORM, the portion after "as + NOUN PHRASE" contains as + PRONOUN as part of the comparison depicted in this sc.

    so, not able to get how this complete structure -- VERB FORM + as + NOUN PHRASE + as + PRONOUN -- becomes incorrect! because in GMAT comparison , we get structure like as NOUN as NOUN/PRONOUN, I guess!

    can you please clarify ?
    as + NOUN + as + NOUN/PRONOUN is not a viable structure.
    The correct structure is as + MODIFIER + as + NOUN/PRONOUN.
    Examples:
    Highway 5 is as LONG as HIGHWAY 10.
    Mary exercises as FREQUENTLY as STEVE.
    Cars as POPULAR as THOSE produced last year
    .

    A: as serious injuries as those
    This structure is unidiomatic, since the first as may NOT be followed by a noun.
    The proper structure -- as + MODIFIER + as + NOUN/PRONOUN -- is given in the OA:
    injuries as SERIOUS as THOSE caused by an industrial wood-planing machine.

    _________________
    Mitch Hunt
    GMAT Private Tutor
    GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
    If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Thank" icon.
    Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance.
    For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com.

    Thanked by: ngk4mba3236
    Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.

    Top Member

    Post Sun Apr 24, 2016 8:41 am
    GMATGuruNY wrote:
    ngk4mba3236 wrote:
    Many kitchens today are equipped with high-speed electrical gadgets, such as blenders and food processors, which are able to inflict as serious injuries as those caused by an industrial wood-planing machine.

    (A) which are able to inflict as serious injuries as those
    (B) which can inflict serious injuries such as those
    (C) inflicting injuries as serious as that having been
    (D) capable to inflict injuries as serious as that
    (E) capable of inflicting injuries as serious as those
    On the GMAT, which + PLURAL VERB must serve to refer to the NEAREST PRECEDING PLURAL NOUN.
    To my knowledge, no OA has deviated from this rule.
    A: food processors, which are able to inflict
    Here, which are (which + plural verb) seems to refer to food processors (the nearest preceding plural noun), implying that FOOD PROCESSORS are ABLE TO INFLICT injuries.
    The intended meaning is that a specific subset of GADGETS can cause injuries, as in the OA:
    Kitchens are equipped with high-speed electrical gadgets capable of inflicting injuries.
    Food processors are merely an EXAMPLE of this type of high-speed electrical gadget.
    Eliminate A.

    If the verb attributed to which can be singular or plural, the referent for which must be the NEAREST PRECEDING NOUN.
    To my knowledge, no OA has deviated from this rule.
    B: food processors, which can inflict
    Here, can inflict could be singular or plural.
    As a result, which can inflict seems to refer to food processors, implying that FOOD PROCESSORS CAN INFLICT injuries.
    The intended meaning is that a specific subset of GADGETS can cause injuries, as in the OA:
    Kitchens are equipped with high-speed electrical gadgets capable of inflicting injuries.
    Food processors are merely an EXAMPLE of this type of high-speed electrical gadget.
    Eliminate B.

    In C and D, that lacks a singular referent.
    Eliminate C and D.

    The correct answer is E.

    Other errors in A:

    On the GMAT, the words able and ability should not be ascribed to an inanimate object such as a food processor or a gadget.

    A: to inflict as serious injuries
    Here, the portion in red would be appropriate to convey that something is inflicted in the form of a serious injury, as follows:
    During the fight, John was able to inflict as serious injuries three very large gashes.
    Not the intended meaning.
    Hi Mitch,

    In OA E, 'capable of ......' is modifier stars with adjective.

    comma + adjective modifies the nearest noun or noun phrase. So it may also modify 'food processors' not gadgets, the same as choice A & B? Why is Choice E considered right in this case?

    Is there any deviation from the rule.

    Do I miss something here?

    Thanks

    Post Sun Apr 24, 2016 3:17 pm
    Mo2men wrote:
    Hi Mitch,

    In OA E, 'capable of ......' is modifier stars with adjective.

    comma + adjective modifies the nearest noun or noun phrase. So it may also modify 'food processors' not gadgets, the same as choice A & B? Why is Choice E considered right in this case?

    Is there any deviation from the rule.

    Do I miss something here?

    Thanks
    COMMA + ADJECTIVE serves to modify the nearest preceding noun when the purpose of the comma is to indicate that the adjective is a nonessential modifier.
    The Mochica developed their own elaborate society, based upon the cultivation of such crops as corn and beans.
    Here, the purpose of the comma before based (adjective) is to indicate that this adjective is a nonessential modifier.
    As a result, COMMA + based serves to modify society (the nearest preceding noun).

    OA: Many kitchens today are equipped with high-speed electrical gadgets, such as blenders and food processors, capable of inflicting injuries as serious as those caused by an industrial wood-planing machine.
    Here, the purpose of the comma before capable is NOT to indicate that this adjective is a nonessential modifier.
    Rather, this comma serves -- in conjunction with the comma before such -- to indicate that the PORTION IN RED is a nonessential modifier.
    Since a nonessential modifier is just that -- NONESSENTIAL -- we can remove it without altering the core meaning of the sentence.
    If we remove this nonessential modifier, we get:
    Many kitchens today are equipped with high-speed electrical gadgets capable of inflicting injuries as serious as those caused by an industrial wood-planing machine.
    In the resulting sentence, capable clearly serves to modify gadgets.

    _________________
    Mitch Hunt
    GMAT Private Tutor
    GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
    If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Thank" icon.
    Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance.
    For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com.

    Thanked by: Mo2men
    Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.
    ngk4mba3236 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    18 Mar 2016
    Posted:
    174 messages
    Thanked:
    1 times
    Post Mon Jun 06, 2016 5:50 am
    GMATGuruNY wrote:
    On the GMAT, the words able and ability should not be ascribed to an inanimate object such as a food processor or a gadget.
    gmatguru,
    is it always followed on GMAT ? I mean, do we see any deviation of this rule on GMAT ?

    Post Wed Jun 08, 2016 2:16 am
    ngk4mba3236 wrote:
    GMATGuruNY wrote:
    On the GMAT, the words able and ability should not be ascribed to an inanimate object such as a food processor or a gadget.
    gmatguru,
    is it always followed on GMAT ? I mean, do we see any deviation of this rule on GMAT ?
    To my knowledge, no OA from GMAC has ascribed able or ability to an inanimate object.

    _________________
    Mitch Hunt
    GMAT Private Tutor
    GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
    If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Thank" icon.
    Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance.
    For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com.

    Thanked by: ngk4mba3236
    Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 Vincen 132 topics
    2 lheiannie07 65 topics
    3 LUANDATO 54 topics
    4 Roland2rule 43 topics
    5 ardz24 40 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    133 posts
    2 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    114 posts
    3 image description EconomistGMATTutor

    The Economist GMAT Tutor

    113 posts
    4 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

    EMPOWERgmat

    109 posts
    5 image description DavidG@VeritasPrep

    Veritas Prep

    72 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts