• Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep

OG Q Editorial: The roof of Northtown's municipal equipment

This topic has 3 expert replies and 3 member replies
vickysan Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
04 May 2015
Posted:
13 messages
Followed by:
2 members
Thanked:
1 times
Target GMAT Score:
700

OG Q Editorial: The roof of Northtown's municipal equipment

Post Wed Jul 08, 2015 8:52 pm
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    Editorial: The roof of Northtown's municipal equipment-storage building collapsed under the weight of last week's heavy snowfall. The building was constructed recently and met local building-safety codes in every particular, except that the nails used for attaching roof supports to the building's columns were of a smaller size than the codes specify for this purpose. Clearly, this collapse exemplifies how even a single, apparently insignificant departure from safety standards can have severe consequences.

    Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the editorial's argument?

    (A) The only other buildings to suffer roof collapses from the weight of the snowfall were older buildings constructed according to less exacting standards than those in the codes.
    (B) The amount of snow that accumulated on the roof of the equipment-storage building was greater than the predicted maximum that was used in drawing up the safety codes.
    (C) Because the equipment-storage building was not intended for human occupation, some safety-code provisions that would have applied to an office building did not apply to it.
    (D) The municipality of Northtown itself has the responsibility for ensuring that buildings constructed within its boundaries meet the provisions of the building-safety codes.
    (E) Because the equipment-storage building was used for storing snow-removal equipment, the building was almost completely empty when the roof collapsed.

    Experts I'm curious to hear your take. This is from the 2016 book, and the explanation is not really helpful.

    Vicky

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!

    GMAT/MBA Expert

    Jim@StratusPrep MBA Admissions Consultant
    Joined
    11 Nov 2011
    Posted:
    2278 messages
    Followed by:
    265 members
    Thanked:
    659 times
    GMAT Score:
    770
    Post Thu Jul 09, 2015 4:45 am
    The answer is B as it demonstrates that is was something other than the nails that cause the collapse. The first thing you should do in a CR question such as this is find the argument. Here it is that the sub-standard nails caused the collapse. If weakening, you are looking to find something that shows it was not the nails, but rather something else - in this case, snow beyond the intended capacity for the building led to the collapse.

    _________________
    GMAT Answers provides a world class adaptive learning platform.
    -- Push button course navigation to simplify planning
    -- Daily assignments to fit your exam timeline
    -- Organized review that is tailored based on your abiility
    -- 1,000s of unique GMAT questions
    -- 100s of handwritten 'digital flip books' for OG questions
    -- 100% Free Trial and less than $20 per month after.
    -- Free GMAT Quantitative Review

    Thanked by: KevinLuk
    src_saurav Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
    Joined
    15 Mar 2015
    Posted:
    145 messages
    Followed by:
    1 members
    Thanked:
    2 times
    Post Sun Jul 12, 2015 2:32 am
    B is the answer. I agree to everything that Jim says.

    Find the assumption .It is the UNSTATED premise(hidden argument) and look to weaken or strngthen it.

    vickysan Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    04 May 2015
    Posted:
    13 messages
    Followed by:
    2 members
    Thanked:
    1 times
    Target GMAT Score:
    700
    Post Wed Jul 15, 2015 9:21 pm
    Thanks for your helpful input about B, Jim.

    I'm also curious about getting some other expert explanations, ideally from Mitch, or Marty Murray? I'd appreciate it if possible. Your reasoning really resonates with me. Thanks!!

    Post Thu Jul 16, 2015 2:55 am
    vickysan wrote:
    Editorial: The roof of Northtown's municipal equipment-storage building collapsed under the weight of last week's heavy snowfall. The building was constructed recently and met local building-safety codes in every particular, except that the nails used for attaching roof supports to the building's columns were of a smaller size than the codes specify for this purpose. Clearly, this collapse exemplifies how even a single, apparently insignificant departure from safety standards can have severe consequences.

    Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the editorial's argument?

    (A) The only other buildings to suffer roof collapses from the weight of the snowfall were older buildings constructed according to less exacting standards than those in the codes.
    (B) The amount of snow that accumulated on the roof of the equipment-storage building was greater than the predicted maximum that was used in drawing up the safety codes.
    (C) Because the equipment-storage building was not intended for human occupation, some safety-code provisions that would have applied to an office building did not apply to it.
    (D) The municipality of Northtown itself has the responsibility for ensuring that buildings constructed within its boundaries meet the provisions of the building-safety codes.
    (E) Because the equipment-storage building was used for storing snow-removal equipment, the building was almost completely empty when the roof collapsed.
    Premise: The NAILS were of a SMALLER SIZE than the codes specify.
    Conclusion: Even a single, apparently insignificant departure from safety standards can have SEVERE CONSEQUENCES.

    This is a CAUSAL argument.
    The passage assumes that the SMALLER SIZE OF THE NAILS had a SEVERE CONSEQUENCE -- namely, the collapse of the roof.
    One way to weaken a causal argument is to suggest an ALTERNATE CAUSE.

    Answer choice B: The amount of snow that accumulated on the roof of the equipment-storage building was greater than the predicted maximum that was used in drawing up the safety codes.
    Implication:
    Even if the nails had been of the appropriate size, the roof still would have collapsed, since THE AMOUNT OF SNOW WAS GREATER THAN THE PREDICTED MAXIMUM.
    By suggesting that an ALTERNATE CAUSE -- the amount of snow greater than the predicted maximum -- caused the collapse of the roof, B WEAKENS the conclusion that a single departure from safety standards can have severe consequences.

    The correct answer is B.

    _________________
    Mitch Hunt
    GMAT Private Tutor
    GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
    If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Thank" icon.
    Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance.
    For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com.

    Thanked by: RBBmba@2014, Anaira Mitch
    Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.
    RBBmba@2014 Legendary Member Default Avatar
    Joined
    30 May 2012
    Posted:
    888 messages
    Followed by:
    4 members
    Thanked:
    8 times
    Post Thu May 12, 2016 9:42 am
    Hi Mitch,
    I can understand why B is the OA, but it seems that the option C is pretty close to be the OA! Why it'd be wrong ?

    We know that Conclusion: Even a single, apparently insignificant departure from safety standards can have SEVERE CONSEQUENCES.

    So option C implies that there were DEVIATIONS (more than the NAILS of a SMALLER SIZE) from some safety-code provisions. Then can we not say that these DEVIATIONS are ALTERNATE REASONS for the collapse ?

    Post Fri May 13, 2016 4:40 am
    RBBmba@2014 wrote:
    We know that Conclusion: Even a single, apparently insignificant departure from safety standards can have SEVERE CONSEQUENCES.

    So option C implies that there were DEVIATIONS (more than the NAILS of a SMALLER SIZE) from some safety-code provisions. Then can we not say that these DEVIATIONS are ALTERNATE REASONS for the collapse ?
    C: Because the equipment-storage building was not intended for human occupation, some safety-code provisions that would have applied to an office building did not apply to it.
    This option attempts to weaken the PREMISE that the building met local building-safety codes IN EVERY PARTICULAR except for the misuse of nails.
    A premise is a FACT.
    It cannot be weakened.
    Eliminate any answer choice that attempts to weaken a premise.
    Eliminate C.

    _________________
    Mitch Hunt
    GMAT Private Tutor
    GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
    If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Thank" icon.
    Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance.
    For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com.

    Thanked by: RBBmba@2014
    Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 Vincen 152 topics
    2 lheiannie07 61 topics
    3 Roland2rule 49 topics
    4 LUANDATO 44 topics
    5 ardz24 40 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    140 posts
    2 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

    EMPOWERgmat

    110 posts
    3 image description EconomistGMATTutor

    The Economist GMAT Tutor

    109 posts
    4 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    107 posts
    5 image description DavidG@VeritasPrep

    Veritas Prep

    72 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts