• Free Trial & Practice Exam
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 1 Hour Free
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Veritas GMAT Class
Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5 Day FREE Trial
Study Smarter, Not Harder

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Magoosh
Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Get 300+ Practice Questions

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Practice Test & Review
How would you score if you took the GMAT

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
Register now and save up to \$200

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

## OG Diag Test Q doubt OA (0 also an integer)

This topic has 2 expert replies and 11 member replies
aspiregmat Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Joined
11 Nov 2007
Posted:
15 messages
Thanked:
1 times

#### OG Diag Test Q doubt OA (0 also an integer)

Mon Aug 10, 2009 6:45 am
Elapsed Time: 00:00
• Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
I tried searching in the forum with little success. If its already discussed can you plz point me to that thread.

Does the integer k have at least three different positive prime factors ?

(1) k/15 is an integer
(2) k/10 is an integer

OA : C

I understand why the answer is so. But it ignores the case k=0. 0 is an integer and 0/15 and 0/10 is also an integer. So IMO the answer should be E.

Any thoughts.

Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
shahdevine Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
18 May 2008
Posted:
197 messages
Thanked:
12 times
Test Date:
sept 8
Target GMAT Score:
710
Mon Aug 10, 2009 7:49 am
aspiregmat wrote:
I tried searching in the forum with little success. If its already discussed can you plz point me to that thread.

Does the integer k have at least three different positive prime factors ?

(1) k/15 is an integer
(2) k/10 is an integer

OA : C

I understand why the answer is so. But it ignores the case k=0. 0 is an integer and 0/15 and 0/10 is also an integer. So IMO the answer should be E.

Any thoughts.
key word is three different positive prime factors. 0 is not positive.

aspiregmat Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Joined
11 Nov 2007
Posted:
15 messages
Thanked:
1 times
Mon Aug 10, 2009 11:29 pm
Its not given that K is positive integer. It just asks that if K has 3 distinct positive prime factors. We cannot assume K to be positive.

life is a test Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
02 Mar 2009
Posted:
138 messages
Thanked:
15 times
Tue Aug 11, 2009 7:11 am
aspiregmat - the requirements are that k must be positive (hence k=0 and k = negative number is out). Moreover there has to be three distinct prime factors

(1) k/15 is an integer--> k = 15x --> 3*5*x--> insuff
(2) k/10 is an integer--> k = 10x--> 2*5*x-->insuff

jjk Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Joined
12 Mar 2009
Posted:
43 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Thanked:
10 times
Test Date:
8/18/09
Target GMAT Score:
720
GMAT Score:
730
Tue Aug 18, 2009 7:45 am
0 is also not a prime factor.

riomadera Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Joined
20 Nov 2009
Posted:
1 messages
Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:48 pm
I too was having trouble understanding this problem, but after reading the thread, I now fully understand why the answer is C.

Statement (1) : k/15 is an integer

If k=0, the number of prime factors is 0

If k is any integer other than 0, k will have at least 2 prime factors.

example 1: k = 15, 15/15 = 3*5 / 3*5 = 1

- In example 1, we see that k has exactly 2 prime factors (3 and 5).

example 2: k = 30, 30/15 = 2*3*5 / 3*5 = 2

- In example 2, we see that k has exactly 3 prime factors (2, 3 and 5).

Since k can be any big number so long as 3 and 5 are prime factors of k, we see through example 2 that the number of prime factors of k is at least 2.

...and because the number of prime factors for k can be either 0 or at least 2, this statement does not give us a single answer, thus it is insufficient.

A similar reasoning can be said about statement 2 alone.

### GMAT/MBA Expert

Testluv GMAT Instructor
Joined
19 Oct 2009
Posted:
1302 messages
Followed by:
162 members
Thanked:
538 times
GMAT Score:
800
Wed Feb 24, 2010 7:32 pm
Not only is 0 not a prime factor, in fact it is not a factor of any number at all because you can't divide by 0. 0 is, however, a multiple of all numbers.

Does the integer k have at least three different positive prime factors ?

(1) k/15 is an integer

Yes, k can be 0, in which case k does have at least three different positive prime factors. But it doesn't have to be. In order for k/15 to be an integer k has to have at least 3 and 5 as prime factors. Otherwise it wouldn't be divisible by 15.

(2) k/10 is an integer

By similar reasoning, k has to have at least 2 and 5 as prime factos. Otherwise, it wouldn't be divisible by 10.

Together, you know that k has at least 2, 3 and 5 as prime factors.

Choose C.

_________________
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto

Free GMAT Practice Test under Proctored Conditions! - Find a practice test near you or live and online in Kaplan's Classroom Anywhere environment. Register today!
tnaim Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Joined
16 Mar 2010
Posted:
67 messages
Thanked:
3 times
Mon Apr 19, 2010 7:47 am
Hi,
Is 1 not considered a factor?
in this case if we have k/15=I => k=15*I => k=1*3*5*I

### GMAT/MBA Expert

Testluv GMAT Instructor
Joined
19 Oct 2009
Posted:
1302 messages
Followed by:
162 members
Thanked:
538 times
GMAT Score:
800
Mon Apr 19, 2010 9:21 am
tnaim wrote:
Hi,
Is 1 not considered a factor?
in this case if we have k/15=I => k=15*I => k=1*3*5*I
1 is a factor but it is not a prime factor. The smallest prime factor is 2 (2 is also the only even prime factor).

_________________
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto

Thanked by: tnaim, ameya85
Free GMAT Practice Test under Proctored Conditions! - Find a practice test near you or live and online in Kaplan's Classroom Anywhere environment. Register today!
tnaim Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Joined
16 Mar 2010
Posted:
67 messages
Thanked:
3 times
Mon Apr 19, 2010 9:59 am
Testluv wrote:
tnaim wrote:
Hi,
Is 1 not considered a factor?
in this case if we have k/15=I => k=15*I => k=1*3*5*I
1 is a factor but it is not a prime factor. The smallest prime factor is 2 (2 is also the only even prime factor).
THANK you!!

ayankm Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Joined
19 Apr 2010
Posted:
48 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Thanked:
5 times
Test Date:
24/06/2010
Target GMAT Score:
7XX
GMAT Score:
660
Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:22 pm
Testluv wrote:
Not only is 0 not a prime factor, in fact it is not a factor of any number at all because you can't divide by 0. 0 is, however, a multiple of all numbers.

Does the integer k have at least three different positive prime factors ?

(1) k/15 is an integer

Yes, k can be 0, in which case k does have at least three different positive prime factors. But it doesn't have to be. In order for k/15 to be an integer k has to have at least 3 and 5 as prime factors. Otherwise it wouldn't be divisible by 15.

(2) k/10 is an integer

By similar reasoning, k has to have at least 2 and 5 as prime factos. Otherwise, it wouldn't be divisible by 10.

Together, you know that k has at least 2, 3 and 5 as prime factors.

Choose C.
Excellent stuff...nice explanation

ameya85 Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Joined
30 Jan 2009
Posted:
30 messages
Test Date:
28th April 2012
Sun Jan 22, 2012 12:01 am
Testluv wrote:
tnaim wrote:
Hi,
Is 1 not considered a factor?
in this case if we have k/15=I => k=15*I => k=1*3*5*I
1 is a factor but it is not a prime factor. The smallest prime factor is 2 (2 is also the only even prime factor).
I Googled the entire question just to understand why 1 is not consiered while counting the factors. And from your inputs, I learned something that is very basic yet extremely helpful. Thanks for this info.

Ameya

llynx Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Joined
03 Jul 2012
Posted:
2 messages
Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:17 am
aspiregmat wrote:
Its not given that K is positive integer. It just asks that if K has 3 distinct positive prime factors. We cannot assume K to be positive.
life is a test wrote:
aspiregmat - the requirements are that k must be positive (hence k=0 and k = negative number is out). Moreover there has to be three distinct prime factors

(1) k/15 is an integer--> k = 15x --> 3*5*x--> insuff
(2) k/10 is an integer--> k = 10x--> 2*5*x-->insuff
I don't understand how you come to the assumption that k must be positive. This assumption is not stated anywhere in the question.

If you are given that k/15 and k/10 are integers, they are allowed to be negative integers and thus neither (1) nor (2) are sufficient without knowing that k is positive.

Rohan Nanda Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Joined
04 Apr 2012
Posted:
4 messages
Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:16 pm
llynx wrote:
aspiregmat wrote:
Its not given that K is positive integer. It just asks that if K has 3 distinct positive prime factors. We cannot assume K to be positive.
life is a test wrote:
aspiregmat - the requirements are that k must be positive (hence k=0 and k = negative number is out). Moreover there has to be three distinct prime factors

(1) k/15 is an integer--> k = 15x --> 3*5*x--> insuff
(2) k/10 is an integer--> k = 10x--> 2*5*x-->insuff
I don't understand how you come to the assumption that k must be positive. This assumption is not stated anywhere in the question.

If you are given that k/15 and k/10 are integers, they are allowed to be negative integers and thus neither (1) nor (2) are sufficient without knowing that k is positive.
Absolutely. The question should specify positive. Otherwise answer is E. I request the experts to have a look at this. It is ambiguous.

_________________
Cheers!

Rohan

### Best Conversation Starters

1 Vincen 180 topics
2 lheiannie07 61 topics
3 Roland2rule 54 topics
4 ardz24 44 topics
5 VJesus12 14 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

### Most Active Experts

1 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

155 posts
2 Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

105 posts
3 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

101 posts
4 Jay@ManhattanReview

Manhattan Review

82 posts
5 Matt@VeritasPrep

Veritas Prep

80 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts