• Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer

OG 13 #9

This topic has 3 expert replies and 9 member replies
hey_thr67 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
15 Feb 2011
Posted:
299 messages
Followed by:
2 members
Upvotes:
9

OG 13 #9

Post Sat Jun 09, 2012 4:01 am
In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to about 41 million tons, nearly 25 percent less than those of the 1978 harvest.

A: less than those of the 1978 harvest.
B: less than the 1978 harvest.
C: less than 1978.
D: fewer than 1978.
E: less than that of India's 1978 harvest.

OA is B. Why not A ?

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!

Top Member

richachampion Legendary Member
Joined
21 Jul 2015
Posted:
697 messages
Followed by:
25 members
Upvotes:
32
Test Date:
∞ →
Target GMAT Score:
760
GMAT Score:
740
Most Thanked Member Most Responsive Member
Top Reply
Post Tue Aug 09, 2016 4:46 am

_________________
R I C H A,
My GMAT Journey: 470 → 720 → 740
Target Score: 760+
richacrunch2@gmail.com
1. Press thanks if you like my solution.
2. Contact me if you are not improving. (No Free Lunch!)

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag

Top Member

richachampion Legendary Member
Joined
21 Jul 2015
Posted:
697 messages
Followed by:
25 members
Upvotes:
32
Test Date:
∞ →
Target GMAT Score:
760
GMAT Score:
740
Most Thanked Member Most Responsive Member
Top Reply
Post Tue Aug 09, 2016 4:45 am
AbdurRakib wrote:
richachampion wrote:
In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to about 41 million tons, nearly 25 percent less than those of the 1978 harvest.

A: less than those of the 1978 harvest.
Guys, "those of" here refers to the tons. Let us Re-write the Options.
A: less than tons of the 1978 harvest. This option doesn't convey proper meaning, and also less is wrong here. It should be fewer.

Guys as you asked if we changed "those" to "that" - Then the option will look like -
A: less than that of the 1978 harvest.

This creates ambiguity -
Unlike "those of", "that of" can refer to both singular and plural entities.
"that of" would create an ambiguity whether it is tons or production that it is referring to.

Option E makes a little improvement by changing less to fewer, but then again it creates ambiguity by introducing "that of". Apart from this option also is quite wordy and indirect.

Does this all make sense Belisa?
"Unlike "those of", "that of" can refer to both singular and plural entities."

May I get pair of example sentences about your undersiang above.

Thanks
I do not have the information handy now, but the information is true when I WILL encounter such problem I will let you know.

_________________
R I C H A,
My GMAT Journey: 470 → 720 → 740
Target Score: 760+
richacrunch2@gmail.com
1. Press thanks if you like my solution.
2. Contact me if you are not improving. (No Free Lunch!)

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag

Top Member

richachampion Legendary Member
Joined
21 Jul 2015
Posted:
697 messages
Followed by:
25 members
Upvotes:
32
Test Date:
∞ →
Target GMAT Score:
760
GMAT Score:
740
Most Thanked Member Most Responsive Member
Post Tue Aug 09, 2016 4:46 am

_________________
R I C H A,
My GMAT Journey: 470 → 720 → 740
Target Score: 760+
richacrunch2@gmail.com
1. Press thanks if you like my solution.
2. Contact me if you are not improving. (No Free Lunch!)

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag

Top Member

richachampion Legendary Member
Joined
21 Jul 2015
Posted:
697 messages
Followed by:
25 members
Upvotes:
32
Test Date:
∞ →
Target GMAT Score:
760
GMAT Score:
740
Most Thanked Member Most Responsive Member
Post Tue Aug 09, 2016 4:45 am
AbdurRakib wrote:
richachampion wrote:
In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to about 41 million tons, nearly 25 percent less than those of the 1978 harvest.

A: less than those of the 1978 harvest.
Guys, "those of" here refers to the tons. Let us Re-write the Options.
A: less than tons of the 1978 harvest. This option doesn't convey proper meaning, and also less is wrong here. It should be fewer.

Guys as you asked if we changed "those" to "that" - Then the option will look like -
A: less than that of the 1978 harvest.

This creates ambiguity -
Unlike "those of", "that of" can refer to both singular and plural entities.
"that of" would create an ambiguity whether it is tons or production that it is referring to.

Option E makes a little improvement by changing less to fewer, but then again it creates ambiguity by introducing "that of". Apart from this option also is quite wordy and indirect.

Does this all make sense Belisa?
"Unlike "those of", "that of" can refer to both singular and plural entities."

May I get pair of example sentences about your undersiang above.

Thanks
I do not have the information handy now, but the information is true when I WILL encounter such problem I will let you know.

_________________
R I C H A,
My GMAT Journey: 470 → 720 → 740
Target Score: 760+
richacrunch2@gmail.com
1. Press thanks if you like my solution.
2. Contact me if you are not improving. (No Free Lunch!)

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
joealam1 Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
14 Aug 2016
Posted:
74 messages
Upvotes:
1
Target GMAT Score:
740
GMAT Score:
670
Post Tue Sep 06, 2016 6:37 am
Hey Guys,

I have doubts on the "less/fewer than" split.

"nearly 25 percent" can it refer to 41 millions tons in another sentence??

Let's consider that E) was : fewer than the 1978 harvest

then could it have been the right answer??

Thanks.

Regards,

Joe

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag

Top Member

richachampion Legendary Member
Joined
21 Jul 2015
Posted:
697 messages
Followed by:
25 members
Upvotes:
32
Test Date:
∞ →
Target GMAT Score:
760
GMAT Score:
740
Most Thanked Member Most Responsive Member
Post Wed Aug 10, 2016 4:34 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
richachampion wrote:
Unlike "those of", "that of" can refer to both singular and plural entities.
Not true.
that of must serve to refer to a SINGULAR antecedent.
those of must serve to refer to a PLURAL antecedent.
Thank You Mr. Hunt,

But there are 2-3 Official question in which that of is referring back to Plural. I do not have those problems handy with me, But I have bookmarked this thread as soon as I get a hold of them I will post those problems here.

_________________
R I C H A,
My GMAT Journey: 470 → 720 → 740
Target Score: 760+
richacrunch2@gmail.com
1. Press thanks if you like my solution.
2. Contact me if you are not improving. (No Free Lunch!)

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
Post Wed Aug 10, 2016 4:25 am
richachampion wrote:
Unlike "those of", "that of" can refer to both singular and plural entities.
Not true.
that of must serve to refer to a SINGULAR antecedent.
those of must serve to refer to a PLURAL antecedent.

_________________
Mitch Hunt
GMAT Private Tutor
GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Thank" icon.
Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance.
For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.
AbdurRakib Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Joined
23 Aug 2014
Posted:
25 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Upvotes:
2
Target GMAT Score:
750+
Post Tue Aug 09, 2016 3:25 am
richachampion wrote:
In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to about 41 million tons, nearly 25 percent less than those of the 1978 harvest.

A: less than those of the 1978 harvest.
Guys, "those of" here refers to the tons. Let us Re-write the Options.
A: less than tons of the 1978 harvest. This option doesn't convey proper meaning, and also less is wrong here. It should be fewer.

Guys as you asked if we changed "those" to "that" - Then the option will look like -
A: less than that of the 1978 harvest.

This creates ambiguity -
Unlike "those of", "that of" can refer to both singular and plural entities.
"that of" would create an ambiguity whether it is tons or production that it is referring to.

Option E makes a little improvement by changing less to fewer, but then again it creates ambiguity by introducing "that of". Apart from this option also is quite wordy and indirect.

Does this all make sense Belisa?
"Unlike "those of", "that of" can refer to both singular and plural entities."

May I get pair of example sentences about your undersiang above.

Thanks

_________________
What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag

Top Member

richachampion Legendary Member
Joined
21 Jul 2015
Posted:
697 messages
Followed by:
25 members
Upvotes:
32
Test Date:
∞ →
Target GMAT Score:
760
GMAT Score:
740
Most Thanked Member Most Responsive Member
Post Sat Aug 06, 2016 4:27 pm
In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to about 41 million tons, nearly 25 percent less than those of the 1978 harvest.

A: less than those of the 1978 harvest.
Guys, "those of" here refers to the tons. Let us Re-write the Options.
A: less than tons of the 1978 harvest. This option doesn't convey proper meaning, and also less is wrong here. It should be fewer.

Guys as you asked if we changed "those" to "that" - Then the option will look like -
A: less than that of the 1978 harvest.

This creates ambiguity -
Unlike "those of", "that of" can refer to both singular and plural entities.
"that of" would create an ambiguity whether it is tons or production that it is referring to.

Option E makes a little improvement by changing less to fewer, but then again it creates ambiguity by introducing "that of". Apart from this option also is quite wordy and indirect.

Does this all make sense Belisa?

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
Post Mon Jun 11, 2012 4:19 am
duongthang wrote:
B comapre " rice production " with "havest" . This is ok.

E compare " rice production in 79" with " rice production in 78" is is ok. Why E is redundant? pls, help.
Please revisit my earlier post, in which I've fleshed out the reasoning.

_________________
Mitch Hunt
GMAT Private Tutor
GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Thank" icon.
Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance.
For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.
tanviet Legendary Member Default Avatar
Joined
20 May 2008
Posted:
1404 messages
Followed by:
2 members
Upvotes:
18
Post Mon Jun 11, 2012 2:44 am
B comapre " rice production " with "havest" . This is ok.

E compare " rice production in 79" with " rice production in 78" is is ok. Why E is redundant? pls, help.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
tanviet Legendary Member Default Avatar
Joined
20 May 2008
Posted:
1404 messages
Followed by:
2 members
Upvotes:
18
Post Mon Jun 11, 2012 2:37 am
B compare "rice production" with " havest" . This is ok

E compare "rice production in 79" to "rice production in 78". This is ok . Why E is redundant? please, help, thank you.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag

Best Conversation Starters

1 lheiannie07 112 topics
2 swerve 64 topics
3 LUANDATO 64 topics
4 ardz24 61 topics
5 AAPL 57 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

Most Active Experts

1 image description Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

227 posts
2 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

176 posts
3 image description Jeff@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

168 posts
4 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

138 posts
5 image description GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

129 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts