OG 11 ----81

[This topic has 7 member replies]
Free $100 Amazon.com Gift Card - Buy a GMAT course using a Beat The GMAT discount code between Mar 8-22 and get a $100 Amazon.com Gift Card. Learn more!
Post New Topic   Post Reply

schumi_gmat
GMAT Destroyer!

Default Avatar

Joined: 03 Sep 2008
Posts: 367

Thanks given: 3
Thanked 12 times in 11 posts

Target GMAT Score: 700+

Topic: OG 11 ----81
PostThu Jun 11, 2009 7:06 pm

Elapsed Time:
00:00
Lap   Why a timer is critical to improving your score

Q. A recent report determined that although only three percent of drivers on Maryland highways equipped their vehicles with radar detectors, thirty-three percent of all vehicles ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were equipped with them. Clearly, drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who do not.

The conclusion drawn above depends on which of the following assumptions?
(A) Drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are less likely to be ticketed for exceeding the speed limit than are drivers who do not.
(B) Drivers who are ticketed for exceeding the speed limit are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who are not ticketed.
(C) The number of vehicles that were ticketed for exceeding the speed limit was greater than the number of vehicles that were equipped with radar detectors.
(D) Many of the vehicles that were ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were ticketed more than once in the time period covered by the report.
(E) Drivers on Maryland highways exceeded the speed limit more often than did drivers on other state highways not covered in the report.

OA is (B).

I know why OA is correct.
Can anyone explain why D is wrong?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Thanked by: turbo jet
tohellandback
GMAT Destroyer!

Default Avatar

Joined: 18 May 2009
Posts: 749

Thanks given: 2
Thanked 70 times in 67 posts
Location: Tokyo

Target GMAT Score: 750
GMAT Score: 680

PostThu Jun 11, 2009 7:32 pm

I look forward to the explanation to this one..
_________________
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mikeCoolBoy
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!

Default Avatar

Joined: 20 Jan 2009
Posts: 119

Thanks given: 5
Thanked 8 times in 8 posts

Target GMAT Score: 720+
GMAT Score: 730

PostFri Jun 12, 2009 12:02 am

I came across this problem yesterday and I also picked D. I'm also looking forward to the explanation because the one in the OG did not convince me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
turbo jet
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!



Joined: 08 Jun 2009
Posts: 131

Thanks given: 27
Thanked 1 times in 1 posts

PostFri Jun 12, 2009 3:30 am

Explanation for eliminating D:Use Negating the Assumption Method

1. What is my conclusion:
Likeliness of crossing speed: By Radar equipped vehicle drivers MORE than non radar equipped vehicles
or paraphhrased to No of radar equipped drivers speeding> No of non radar equipped drivers speeding

2. Negate the assumption D:which tells us that
All cars that have been ticketed for crossing speed are ONE TIMER speed breakers.
The cars may be radar or non radar equipped.


3. Does my negated assumption undermine my conclusion?
No. It is neutral. I only know that all cars are one time speed breakers.
I cannot say anything about the no of cars of each type that sped drove.

Therefore eliminate D


However negating B assumption directly undermines my conclusion.

Hope this helps!!
Cheers
Turbo Jet

_________________
Life is Tom; I am Jerry Wink

http://turbo-jet.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
duongthang
GMAT Destroyer!

Default Avatar

Joined: 20 May 2008
Posts: 738

Thanks given: 2
Thanked 6 times in 6 posts

PostMon Jun 15, 2009 10:04 pm

this one is hard for me first time but now I understand it

evidence, statistics must be representative for the conclusion to be good
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hk
Moderator



Joined: 28 Jan 2009
Posts: 497

Thanks given: 8
Thanked 26 times in 25 posts
Location: NJ

GMAT Score: 640

PostTue Jun 16, 2009 12:26 pm

Here is another take on why to leave D alone!!!

The prompt says that only 3% of the drivers have radar and concludes that the drivers who have radar are prone to over speed.

Statement D says that most of the drivers who were ticketed for overspeeding were ticketed more than once. This statement talk about all of the drivers in general and does not talk about the ones who have radar --> which is the heart of the conclusion. Even logically speaking is its true that most of the drivers in Maryland were ticketed more than once, then probability of non-radar installed drivers (97% of population) to get a ticket twice is more. Hence this cannot be an assumption.

Hope i managed to type in whats in my mind Very Happy

_________________
Don't worry about a low score, you still can make it big. wanna know how I did it? Visit http://hariformba.blogspot.com

Wanna know what I'm upto? Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/harikrish
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pink_08
Rising GMAT Star

Default Avatar

Joined: 31 Dec 2008
Posts: 71

Thanks given: 1
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts

PostThu Jul 02, 2009 9:19 pm

I am not sure how this works with actual numbers. Can someone please clarify. Example below :

3%of ( say 100,00 drivers in Maryland ) = 300

300 equipped with Radar

33% of ( 100 vehicles ticketed for exceeding speed limit ) = 33

# of Vehicles with radar > without radar, when it comes to exceeding speed limits

300 vehicles are MORE likely to exceed speed limits regularly than 99700



pink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vineetbatra
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!

Default Avatar

Joined: 19 Feb 2009
Posts: 261

Thanks given: 15
Thanked 2 times in 2 posts

PostSat Oct 03, 2009 4:25 pm

turbo jet wrote:
Explanation for eliminating D:Use Negating the Assumption Method

1. What is my conclusion:
Likeliness of crossing speed: By Radar equipped vehicle drivers MORE than non radar equipped vehicles
or paraphhrased to No of radar equipped drivers speeding> No of non radar equipped drivers speeding

2. Negate the assumption D:which tells us that
All cars that have been ticketed for crossing speed are ONE TIMER speed breakers.
The cars may be radar or non radar equipped.


3. Does my negated assumption undermine my conclusion?
No. It is neutral. I only know that all cars are one time speed breakers.
I cannot say anything about the no of cars of each type that sped drove.

Therefore eliminate D


However negating B assumption directly undermines my conclusion.

Hope this helps!!
Cheers
Turbo Jet
Hi can you please explain how Assumption Negation will work with B.

Thanks,

Vineet
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post New Topic   Post Reply All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1
 
Most Active Members in Last 30 Days
1. harsh.champ 625 posts
2. shashank.ism 465 posts
3. ajith 370 posts
4. money9111 353 posts
5. thephoenix 349 posts
Most Active Experts in Last 30 Days
1. lunarpower
Manhattan GMAT Teacher
85 posts
2. Stuart Kovinsky
Kaplan GMAT Teacher
70 posts
3. Lisa Anderson
Stacy Blackman Consulting
50 posts
4. Testluv
Kaplan GMAT Teacher
50 posts
5. Stacey Koprince
Manhattan GMAT Teacher
35 posts