Find the greatest 4 digit number which when divided by 10,11,15 and 22 leaves 3,4,8 and 15 as remainders respectively
a)9907 b)9903 c)9893 d) None of these
Find the greatest number , which will divide 215,167 and 135 so as to leave the same remainder in each case
a)64 b)32 c)24 d)16
What is the smallest number which when increased by 6 is divisible by 36,63 and 108?
a) 750 b)752 c)754 d)756
Number Systems
This topic has expert replies
- MartyMurray
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2131
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:26 am
- Location: https://martymurraycoaching.com/
- Thanked: 955 times
- Followed by:140 members
- GMAT Score:800
Dividing a number by 10 generates a remainder equal to the units digit. Only B and C work.sukhman wrote:Find the greatest 4 digit number which when divided by 10,11,15 and 22 leaves 3,4,8 and 15 as remainders respectively
a)9907 b)9903 c)9893 d) None of these
9900 divides evenly by 11. So dividing 9903 by 11 generates a remainder of 3 and 9893 by 11 a reminder of 4.
We are down to C or none.
99 is multiple of 3 and 100 is a multiple of 5. So 9900 is a multiple of 3 x 5 = 15. 9893 is 7 less than 9900. so the remainder when 9893 is divided by 15 is 8. C Still works.
99 is a multiple of 11 and 100 is a multiple of 2. So 9900 is a multiple of 11 x 2 = 22. 9893 is 7 less than 9900. 22 - 7 = 15, which is the remainder when 9893 is divided by 22.
So the correct answer is C.
Scanning the numbers I see that 167 is just over 160 = 10 x 16. So the remainder generated by 167/16 is 7.Find the greatest number that will divide 215,167 and 135 so as to leave the same remainder in each case
a)64 b)32 c)24 d)16
The factors 10 x 16 can be broken down to 5 x 2 x 16. So 5 x 32 = 160, and the remainder generated by 167/32 is 7.
24 = 3 x 8. 160 does not have 3 as a factor. So 24 cannot be a factor of 160 and 167/24 will not generate the remainder 7.
64 = 2 x 32. So 64 cannot be a factor of 160, or 5 x 32. So 167/64 will not generate a remainder 7.
So we are down to 16 and 32.
The multiple of 32 closest to 135 is 4 x 32 = 128. So 135/32 and 135/16 generate the same remainder 135 - 128 = 7.
215/16 generates 13 x 16 = 208 with remainder 7. 32 = 2 x 16. So, multiplying 16 by an odd number, 13, will not generate a multiple of 32. So 208 is not a multiple of 32. Therefore the remainder generated by 208/32 will not be 7.
So 16 is the greatest number that works and the correct answer is D.
Scanning the numbers I see that 756 = (7 x 100) + (7 x 8) So 756 is divisible by 108.What is the smallest number which when increased by 6 is divisible by 36,63 and 108?
a) 750 b)752 c)754 d)756
Therefore the only number in the list that when increased by 6 is divisible by 108 is 750.
So the answer must be A.
Marty Murray
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
In the future, please post only one question per thread. Otherwise things can become pretty complicated when there are discussions on multiple questions.
Cheers,
Brent
Cheers,
Brent
GMAT/MBA Expert
- [email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi sukhman,
What is the source of these questions? I ask because none of them is written in proper GMAT 'style' or format. While the basic concepts (division, remainders, arithmetic) will be tested on the GMAT, you won't see questions written in these ways.
As far as solving them is concerned though, they can ALL be solved by TESTing THE ANSWERS. You can use Number Properties to eliminate some of the options, but you essentially just have to 'plug them in' until you find the answer the matches the description given in the prompt.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
What is the source of these questions? I ask because none of them is written in proper GMAT 'style' or format. While the basic concepts (division, remainders, arithmetic) will be tested on the GMAT, you won't see questions written in these ways.
As far as solving them is concerned though, they can ALL be solved by TESTing THE ANSWERS. You can use Number Properties to eliminate some of the options, but you essentially just have to 'plug them in' until you find the answer the matches the description given in the prompt.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 274
- Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2015 10:58 pm
- Thanked: 12 times
- Followed by:1 members
- GMAT Score:530
I believe this type of question is tested in CAT exam BUT NOT in GMAT.
I haven't seen or heard about this type of questions in exam.
Experts/ Instructors...Do you agree that this type have very less or no chance of appearing in GMAT?
I haven't seen or heard about this type of questions in exam.
Experts/ Instructors...Do you agree that this type have very less or no chance of appearing in GMAT?
- GMATinsight
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1100
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2014 11:34 pm
- Location: New Delhi, India
- Thanked: 205 times
- Followed by:24 members
These are not GMAT like questions as all questions have 4 options instead of 5 and Also they require massive calculation if not tried with options unlike what GMAT expects
Option A is clearly out as when divided by 10 that doesn't leave remainder 3
Option B is ruled out as when divided by 15 that doesn't leave remainder 8 (Remainder =3)
Option C is the answer
Check options andsukhman wrote:Find the greatest 4 digit number which when divided by 10,11,15 and 22 leaves 3,4,8 and 15 as remainders respectively
a)9907 b)9903 c)9893 d) None of these
Option A is clearly out as when divided by 10 that doesn't leave remainder 3
Option B is ruled out as when divided by 15 that doesn't leave remainder 8 (Remainder =3)
Option C is the answer
Check with Options againFind the greatest number , which will divide 215,167 and 135 so as to leave the same remainder in each case
a)64 b)32 c)24 d)16
Check with Options againWhat is the smallest number which when increased by 6 is divisible by 36,63 and 108?
a) 750 b)752 c)754 d)756
"GMATinsight"Bhoopendra Singh & Sushma Jha
Most Comprehensive and Affordable Video Course 2000+ CONCEPT Videos and Video Solutions
Whatsapp/Mobile: +91-9999687183 l [email protected]
Contact for One-on-One FREE ONLINE DEMO Class Call/e-mail
Most Efficient and affordable One-On-One Private tutoring fee - US$40-50 per hour
Most Comprehensive and Affordable Video Course 2000+ CONCEPT Videos and Video Solutions
Whatsapp/Mobile: +91-9999687183 l [email protected]
Contact for One-on-One FREE ONLINE DEMO Class Call/e-mail
Most Efficient and affordable One-On-One Private tutoring fee - US$40-50 per hour
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
3 mod 10 means that it must end in 3: A or C.sukhman wrote:Find the greatest 4 digit number which when divided by 10,11,15 and 22 leaves 3,4,8 and 15 as remainders respectively
a)9907 b)9903 c)9893 d) None of these
9907 = 11*900 + 7, so this doesn't give us 4 mod 11: eliminate A.
9893 = 9900 - 15 + 8 and = 8800 + 110 - 22 + 15, so 9893 has all the properties we want. The next four digit number that = 3 mod 10 and = 4 mod 11 must be 110 greater than this (11*10), but there is no four digit number 110 greater than 9893.
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
Let's call this number n. We're given thatsukhman wrote:Find the greatest number , which will divide 215,167 and 135 so as to leave the same remainder in each case
a)64 b)32 c)24 d)16
215 = 167 mod n, or 48 = 0 mod n, so n is a factor of 48: eliminate A and B.
We're also given that
215 = 135 mod n, or 80 = 0 mod n, so n is a factor of 80: only D remains.
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
x + 6 = 0 mod 36, so x = -6 = 30 mod 36sukhman wrote:What is the smallest number which when increased by 6 is divisible by 36,63 and 108?
a) 750 b)752 c)754 d)756
The only number given here with this property is 750 (= 36*20 + 30), so this must be the answer.
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
These all look like questions from the Indian CAT, which assumes a much higher level of mathematical development than the GMAT does. Two of these questions are pretty easy with modular arithmetic, but the first one is rough: it isn't *that* hard to show that C satisfies the conditions, but it's hard to show that there is no GREATER four-digit number that satisfies the conditions without some fluency in the Chinese Remainder Theorem (or equivalent), which is way beyond the GMAT. (And in general, when I tried some old Indian CATs, I found that the problems for which "None of these" was an answer were very difficult to finish in time.)vishalwin wrote:I believe this type of question is tested in CAT exam BUT NOT in GMAT.
I haven't seen or heard about this type of questions in exam.
Experts/ Instructors...Do you agree that this type have very less or no chance of appearing in GMAT?
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
... and just to tack on to my previous response, none of the other solutions above rule out (or even address) "None of these" in the first problem, showing just how daunting it is. (We're used to the GMAT, in which you don't ever have such a challenging answer to contemplate.)
One other way of doing so is using the aforementioned Chinese Remainder Theorem to find the root solution, then adding the LCM of the four divisors to the root.
Let's start with n = 3 mod 10 and n = 4 mod 11. The smallest such number is 103, which isn't too elusive. Any other solutions will be of the form 10*11*(some integer) + 103, so our set is 103, 213, 323, etc.
Notice too that n = 15 mod 22 is a redundancy: since 10*11*(some integer) is always divisible by 22, we only have to consider 103 mod 22, which itself (of course) ends up being 15. So we can ignore this.
That leaves only n = 8 mod 15. 103 and 213 don't have this property, but 323 does, so that's our root solution.
Every other solution must be of the form 323 + LCM(10,11,15)*(some integer), or 323 + 330*(some integer), or 323 + 330m, where m is some integer.
Now we seek the largest four digit integer of the form 330m + 323. 330*30 is too big, but 330*29 comes in below 10,000. 330*29 + 323 is ... (drumroll please!) 9893!
If none of this makes a lick of sense and doesn't interest you, IGNORE IT: it has no bearing on the GMAT, nor (quite likely) on anything you'll encounter in the rest of your life on earth.
One other way of doing so is using the aforementioned Chinese Remainder Theorem to find the root solution, then adding the LCM of the four divisors to the root.
Let's start with n = 3 mod 10 and n = 4 mod 11. The smallest such number is 103, which isn't too elusive. Any other solutions will be of the form 10*11*(some integer) + 103, so our set is 103, 213, 323, etc.
Notice too that n = 15 mod 22 is a redundancy: since 10*11*(some integer) is always divisible by 22, we only have to consider 103 mod 22, which itself (of course) ends up being 15. So we can ignore this.
That leaves only n = 8 mod 15. 103 and 213 don't have this property, but 323 does, so that's our root solution.
Every other solution must be of the form 323 + LCM(10,11,15)*(some integer), or 323 + 330*(some integer), or 323 + 330m, where m is some integer.
Now we seek the largest four digit integer of the form 330m + 323. 330*30 is too big, but 330*29 comes in below 10,000. 330*29 + 323 is ... (drumroll please!) 9893!
If none of this makes a lick of sense and doesn't interest you, IGNORE IT: it has no bearing on the GMAT, nor (quite likely) on anything you'll encounter in the rest of your life on earth.