Welcome! Check out our free B-School Guides to learn how you compare with other applicants.
Login or Register
 

Nuclear deterrence

This topic has 10 member replies
nafishasan Just gettin' started! Default Avatar
Joined
18 Mar 2011
Posted:
27 messages
Nuclear deterrence Post Mon Feb 06, 2012 4:06 am
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    That the policy of nuclear deterrence has worked thus far is unquestionable. Since the end of the Second World War, the very fact that there were nuclear armaments in existence has kept major powers from using nuclear weapons, for fear of starting a worldwide nuclear exchange that would make the land of the power initiating it uninhabitable. The proof is that a third world war between superpowers has not happened.

Which one of the following, if true, indicates a flaw in the argument?

    A. Maintaining a high level of nuclear armaments represents a significant drain on a country’s economy.
    B. From what has happened in the past, it is impossible to infer with certainty what will happen in the future, so an accident could still trigger a third world war between superpowers.
    C. Continuing to produce nuclear weapons beyond the minimum needed for deterrence increases the likelihood of a nuclear accident.
    D. The major powers have engaged in many smaller-scale military operations since the end of the Second World War, while refraining from a nuclear confrontation.
    E. It cannot be known whether it was nuclear deterrence that worked, or some other factor, such as a recognition of the economic value of remaining at peace.

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
    msrdon Just gettin' started! Default Avatar
    Joined
    15 Mar 2011
    Posted:
    8 messages
    Post Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:43 am
    My take on this is B

    nafishasan Just gettin' started! Default Avatar
    Joined
    18 Mar 2011
    Posted:
    27 messages
    Post Mon Feb 06, 2012 9:08 pm
    msrdon wrote:
    My take on this is B
    Explanation please

    msrdon Just gettin' started! Default Avatar
    Joined
    15 Mar 2011
    Posted:
    8 messages
    Post Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:08 pm
    Rewriting the argument:
    Policy of nuclear deterrence has worked thus far.(as per authors analysis) the reason for this is the fear of starting a worldwide nuclear exchange that would make the land of the power initiating it uninhabitable. And to support the argument the author concludes , "proof is that a third world war between superpowers has not happened"

    Which of the following if true, indicates flaw in the argument( or in other words chalange the argument that nuclear deterant is responsible for avoiding worldwide nuclear exchange or a third world war)

    A) Maintaining a high level of nuclear armaments represents a significant drain on a country’s economy. Economic considerationa are Out of context

    B) From what has happened in the past, it is impossible to infer with certainty what will happen in the future, so an accident could still trigger a third world war between superpowers. if this is true then it means that an accident could still trigger a war, insipte having nuclear deterant policy. So it is not only the policy which has resulted in no war senario



    C) Continuing to produce nuclear weapons beyond the minimum needed for deterrence increases the likelihood of a nuclear accident. Even with this true we can not corelate accident and war

    D) The major powers have engaged in many smaller-scale military operations since the end of the Second World War, while refraining from a nuclear confrontation. this will support the argument

    E) It cannot be known whether it was nuclear deterrence that worked, or some other factor, such as a recognition of the economic value of remaining at peace. May be an answer

    Between B and E, Chose B as it felt right. (Don’t have an explanation!)


    What’s the OA?

    akuma Just gettin' started! Default Avatar
    Joined
    15 Dec 2009
    Posted:
    29 messages
    Thanked:
    3 times
    Post Tue Feb 07, 2012 1:13 pm
    msrdon wrote:
    Between B and E, Chose B as it felt right. (Don’t have an explanation!)

    What’s the OA?
    B) From what has happened in the past, it is impossible to infer with certainty what will happen in the future, so an accident could still trigger a third world war between superpowers.

    Choice B talks about the future whereas the conclusion is arguing about the past up until now: nuclear deterrence has worked thus far. In the analogy below, Sarah is stating the conclusion and Mike is stating something similar to choice B.

    Sarah: I know how to potty train my dog named Kit. Kit hasn't pissed on my carpet ever since she was born.
    Mike: It's impossible to know whether Kit is going to pee on your carpet in the future.

    Mike isn't weakening Sarah's argument, which is talking about the past up until to the present.

    Post Wed Feb 08, 2012 12:20 pm
    (B)..past is not always the reflection of future

    nafishasan Just gettin' started! Default Avatar
    Joined
    18 Mar 2011
    Posted:
    27 messages
    Post Thu Feb 09, 2012 9:28 pm
    I want to go with E because this is an alternative solution to the passage. The passage states that nuclear deterrence prevents countries from nuking each other and causing world war 3.

    Therefore we need to find another reason why countries aren't fighting a nuclear war world war 3. Henceforth E is the best solution, since it states another theory that there is economic value for the country to remain at peace.

    A,B,C are all irrelevant since they talk about money and accident, not World War 3 prevention.

    D- Is somewhat relevant, it could be use to undermine the conclusion, but the passage did not say it prevents all wars. It only specifically talks about a nuclear wars.

    Looking for an expert reply.

    amit.trivedi@ymail.com GMAT Destroyer!
    Joined
    09 Nov 2010
    Posted:
    934 messages
    Followed by:
    14 members
    Thanked:
    59 times
    Test Date:
    N.A
    Target GMAT Score:
    750
    Post Fri Feb 10, 2012 5:17 am
    Choice B seems to be correct, experts kindly help in this particular question.

    _________________
    IT IS TIME TO BEAT THE GMAT

    LEARNING, APPLICATION AND TIMING IS THE FACT OF GMAT AND LIFE AS WELL... KEEP PLAYING!!!

    Whenever you feel that my post really helped you to learn something new, please press on the 'THANK' button.

    vikram4689 GMAT Titan
    Joined
    01 Nov 2009
    Posted:
    1324 messages
    Followed by:
    13 members
    Thanked:
    99 times
    Post Fri Feb 24, 2012 10:41 pm
    E it is.

    I see many doubting E so i will explain that one. B talks about future and says that a world war may happen in future. BUT we are not concerned about future we are looking for something that has deterred 3rd world war TILL NOW. Argument says it is nuclear policy and since we have find a flaw we need to find some alternate reason and that is what E provides (an economic policy).

    _________________
    Premise: If you like my post
    Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button Wink

    Thanked by: mohankiran.p
    mankey GMAT Destroyer! Default Avatar
    Joined
    23 Jun 2011
    Posted:
    627 messages
    Followed by:
    1 members
    Thanked:
    4 times
    Post Wed Mar 07, 2012 9:33 pm
    IMO: E. I wonder why people are talking about the future when the question itself doesnt.

    What is the OA?

    Request the experts to help.

    Regards

    vikram4689 GMAT Titan
    Joined
    01 Nov 2009
    Posted:
    1324 messages
    Followed by:
    13 members
    Thanked:
    99 times
    Post Sat Mar 10, 2012 3:35 pm
    Mankey,
    You are right, E is correct.
    mankey wrote:
    IMO: E. I wonder why people are talking about the future when the question itself doesnt.

    What is the OA?

    Request the experts to help.

    Regards

    _________________
    Premise: If you like my post
    Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button Wink

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 varun289 42 topics
    2 greenwich 25 topics
    3 guerrero 20 topics
    4 sana.noor 19 topics
    5 killerdrummer 19 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    196 posts
    2 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    143 posts
    3 image description Anju@Gurome

    Gurome

    121 posts
    4 image description Jim@StratusPrep

    Stratus Prep

    86 posts
    5 image description David@VeritasPrep

    Veritas Prep

    41 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts