National Science Foundation

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 510
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2014 2:24 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:5 members

National Science Foundation

by j_shreyans » Sat Aug 15, 2015 9:47 am
According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were 198,113 female science and engineering graduate students, almost 42% of the graduate students in those fields, twice as much as 1981.


A)twice as much as 1981

B)twice as many as 1981

C)double the figure for 1981

D)double what it was in 1981

E)a number double that of 1981's


OAC

I just want to know why B is wrong.

Experts please advise.

Thanks.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Aug 15, 2015 2:52 pm
j_shreyans wrote:According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were 198,113 female science and engineering graduate students, almost 42% of the graduate students in those fields, twice as much as 1981.


A)twice as much as 1981

B)twice as many as 1981

C)double the figure for 1981

D)double what it was in 1981

E)a number double that of 1981's
In A, twice as much as 1981 seems to compare a percentage to a year.
Eliminate A.

In B, twice as many as 1981 seems to compare a percentage to a year.
Eliminate B.

In D, it (singular) cannot be used to refer to 42% of graduate students (plural).
Eliminate D.

In E, that of 1981's is an error of redundancy. The possessive construction 1981's is not necessary; that of 1981 would be sufficient all on its own.
Eliminate E.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Legendary Member
Posts: 510
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2014 2:24 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:5 members

by j_shreyans » Sun Aug 16, 2015 6:59 am
Hi GMATGuru ,

Thanks for your reply, but still I need a more explanation to eliminate option B. It would be more helpful if explain with example.

Please advise.

Thanks in advance.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Sun Aug 16, 2015 7:28 am
j_shreyans wrote:Hi GMATGuru ,

Thanks for your reply, but still I need a more explanation to eliminate option B. It would be more helpful if explain with example.

Please advise.

Thanks in advance.
B: 42% of the graduate students in those fields, twice as many as 1981.
Implied comparison:
42% of the graduate STUDENTS were twice as many as 1981.
Here, PEOPLE (42% of the graduate students) are illogically compared to a YEAR (1981).
Eliminate B.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2015 8:01 am

by [email protected] » Sun Aug 23, 2015 10:49 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
j_shreyans wrote:According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were 198,113 female science and engineering graduate students, almost 42% of the graduate students in those fields, twice as much as 1981.


A)twice as much as 1981

B)twice as many as 1981

C)double the figure for 1981

D)double what it was in 1981

E)a number double that of 1981's
In A, twice as much as 1981 seems to compare a percentage to a year.
Eliminate A.

In B, twice as many as 1981 seems to compare a percentage to a year.
Eliminate B.

In D, it (singular) cannot be used to refer to 42% of graduate students (plural).
Eliminate D.

In E, that of 1981's is an error of redundancy. The possessive construction 1981's is not necessary; that of 1981 would be sufficient all on its own.
Eliminate E.

The correct answer is C.
Hi Mitch

Somehow the choice C gives me the feeling of a run on sentence as it seems that a proper conjunction is missing somewhere.
It just doesn't sound correct.

Your thoughts please.