Welcome! Check out our free B-School Guides to learn how you compare with other applicants.
Login or Register

National Council of Churches

This topic has 12 member replies
Bookmark
Previous Topic Next Topic
svishal1123 Rising GMAT Star Default Avatar
Joined
28 Mar 2009
Posted:
49 messages
Thanked:
3 times
Target GMAT Score:
750
National Council of Churches Post Thu Apr 16, 2009 4:58 pm
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    A survey by the National Council of Churches showed that in 1986 there were 20,736 female ministers, almost 9 percent of the nation's clergy, twice as much as 1977.

    A. twice as much as 1977
    B. twice as many as 1977
    C. double what it was in 1977
    D. double the figure for 1977
    E. a number double that of 1977's





    A, B, E are clearly wrong. I came up with C which was incorrect because of awkward, wordy and unclear. OA is D. Can somebody please explain. Thanks is advance.

    Thanked by: carolbaby82
    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
    Vemuri GMAT Destroyer!
    Joined
    16 Jan 2009
    Posted:
    682 messages
    Thanked:
    30 times
    Post Thu Apr 16, 2009 6:02 pm
    svishal1123 wrote:
    A survey by the National Council of Churches showed that in 1986 there were 20,736 female ministers, almost 9 percent of the nation's clergy, twice as much as 1977.

    A. twice as much as 1977
    B. twice as many as 1977
    C. double what it was in 1977
    D. double the figure for 1977
    E. a number double that of 1977's

    A, B, E are clearly wrong. I came up with C which was incorrect because of awkward, wordy and unclear. OA is D. Can somebody please explain. Thanks is advance.
    C - Has a pronoun ambiguity problem. The 'it' in the sentence could refer to "National Council of Churches" or "nation's clergy".
    D - Clearly states that the figure doubled.

    I would have liked D to be constructed a bit more clearer, but I am sure the GMAT wants to test our ability to find mistakes rather than like the construction of the sentences. The 'for 1977' comparision to me in unheard. Any explanation on this?

    ex: I served more than 200hrs of my personal time with the under privileged in 2008, double the figure for 2007

    vs

    ex: I served more than 200hrs of my personal time with the under privileged in 2008, double the figure it was in 2007

    I like the second comparision. The 'it' clearly refers to the figure & so there is no ambiguity.

    Thanked by: wehatecrity, vishalogy
    thetrystero Really wants to Beat The GMAT! Default Avatar
    Joined
    13 Apr 2009
    Posted:
    154 messages
    Thanked:
    3 times
    Post Thu Apr 16, 2009 6:14 pm
    svishal1123 wrote:
    A survey by the National Council of Churches showed that in 1986 there were 20,736 female ministers, almost 9 percent of the nation's clergy, twice as much as 1977.

    A. twice as much as 1977
    B. twice as many as 1977
    C. double what it was in 1977
    D. double the figure for 1977
    E. a number double that of 1977's





    A, B, E are clearly wrong. I came up with C which was incorrect because of awkward, wordy and unclear. OA is D. Can somebody please explain. Thanks is advance.
    svishal1123, can you please explain why B,E are incorrect?

    franciskyle Rising GMAT Star
    Joined
    11 Mar 2009
    Posted:
    32 messages
    Target GMAT Score:
    730
    Post Thu Apr 16, 2009 10:10 pm
    What is the problem with B here?

    _________________
    k. Francis

    scoobydooby GMAT Titan Default Avatar
    Joined
    27 Aug 2008
    Posted:
    1035 messages
    Thanked:
    100 times
    Post Thu Apr 16, 2009 10:46 pm
    franciskyle wrote:
    What is the problem with B here?
    seems to compare the number of females in 1986 with the year 1977 itself rather than the number of females in 1977

    gmat740 MBA Student
    Joined
    16 Aug 2008
    Posted:
    1194 messages
    Followed by:
    8 members
    Thanked:
    67 times
    GMAT Score:
    710
    Post Fri Jul 10, 2009 3:46 am
    What is the problem with E?

    real2008 GMAT Destroyer! Default Avatar
    Joined
    01 May 2008
    Posted:
    527 messages
    Thanked:
    7 times
    Post Sat Jul 11, 2009 9:49 am
    when to use twice and when to double?

    turbo jet Really wants to Beat The GMAT!
    Joined
    08 Jun 2009
    Posted:
    154 messages
    Followed by:
    2 members
    Thanked:
    5 times
    Post Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:30 pm
    A: Wrong bec we are comparing nos here. much is used to compare quantity

    B: Gives an impression that it is 2 times 1977 whereas what we mean is 2 times the no of female ministers. Wrong comparison that changes the meaning of sentence

    C: " it" pronoun is ambiguous. So it is better to insert a noun here to remove ambiguity (ambiguity so as what is it: does IT refer to female ministers or nation's clergy)

    E: Modifier error; : "a number double that of 1977's" modifies nation's clergy whereas it should modify 20,736 female ministers.

    Ans: D No error

    Cheers
    TJ
    Very Happy

    _________________
    Life is Tom; I am Jerry Wink

    imhimanshu Rising GMAT Star Default Avatar
    Joined
    28 Feb 2009
    Posted:
    84 messages
    Thanked:
    1 times
    Test Date:
    Not Decided
    Target GMAT Score:
    750
    Post Sun Jul 12, 2009 2:53 am
    can someone explain option D here...double the figure for 1977 is supposed to modify what? is it modifying 9% oe 20736 female number
    Thanks
    Himanshu

    dumb.doofus GMAT Destroyer!
    Joined
    27 Sep 2008
    Posted:
    435 messages
    Thanked:
    39 times
    Test Date:
    30 July 2009
    Target GMAT Score:
    750+
    GMAT Score:
    720
    Post Sun Jul 12, 2009 1:09 pm
    real2008 wrote:
    when to use twice and when to double?
    Definition wise there's not much difference. Twice is an adverb. Double can be an adjective, or noun or verb or an adverb. In the context that we are using in this sentence it is an adjective.

    So I really don't see a difference. Both of these words signify a quantity that is two times a given quantity.

    In this sentence the correct answer uses double not because twice is incorrect, but because the rest of the sentence has errors.

    a] female ministers is a countable noun. Using "much" is incorrect.
    b] Lacks the preposition "in". Whenever you talk about time as done in this sentence.. 1972.. you need to use "in".. twice as many as "in" 1977 would have been correct.
    c] Indeed unclear. What was double? Survey, council or the figure? In most cases usage of "what" as done here is incorrect.
    d] seems clear and concise. double modifies figure.. figure points to number of female ministers.
    e] Incorrect.

    Hope this helps.

    _________________
    One love, one blood, one life. You got to do what you should.
    http://dreambigdreamhigh.blogspot.com/
    http://gmattoughies.blogspot.com/

    wehatecrity Just gettin' started! Default Avatar
    Joined
    20 Aug 2009
    Posted:
    2 messages
    Post Thu Aug 20, 2009 9:53 pm
    imhimanshu wrote:
    can someone explain option D here...double the figure for 1977 is supposed to modify what? is it modifying 9% oe 20736 female number
    Thanks
    Himanshu
    I also believe that "D", although it is the best answer among others, is grammatically incorrect. "double" should be a verb here, and it make no sense to put it there without a connector. Please let me know if I'm wrong

    real2008 GMAT Destroyer! Default Avatar
    Joined
    01 May 2008
    Posted:
    527 messages
    Thanked:
    7 times
    Post Thu Aug 20, 2009 10:57 pm
    E is wrong because of the following:

    that of 1977's

    it should be either "that of 1977"
    or "1977's"


    dumb.doofus and others are requested to comment on it.

    dumb.doofus GMAT Destroyer!
    Joined
    27 Sep 2008
    Posted:
    435 messages
    Thanked:
    39 times
    Test Date:
    30 July 2009
    Target GMAT Score:
    750+
    GMAT Score:
    720
    Post Sat Aug 22, 2009 2:09 pm
    Quote:
    E is wrong because of the following:

    that of 1977's

    it should be either "that of 1977"
    or "1977's"


    dumb.doofus and others are requested to comment on it.
    I was PMed to reply to this thread.

    Essentially what option E introduces is wordiness and possessive apostrophe (1977's). We use possessive apostrophe to indicate belonging and ownership.

    Ex: Rahul's house, Sheela's CD and so on..

    In this sentence, use of "that" refers to the number of 1977 and so we don't need an apostrophe to show ownership or belonging.

    _________________
    One love, one blood, one life. You got to do what you should.
    http://dreambigdreamhigh.blogspot.com/
    http://gmattoughies.blogspot.com/

    Thanked by: real2008

    Best Conversation Starters
    1 GmatKiss 165 topics
    2 karthikpandian19 90 topics
    3 fangtray 66 topics
    4 ronnie1985 60 topics
    5 rahulvsd 40 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts
    1 image description Bill@VeritasPrep

    Veritas Prep

    		 304 posts
    2 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    		 198 posts
    3 image description Anurag@Gurome

    Gurome

    		 141 posts
    4 image description Stuart Kovinsky

    Kaplan GMAT Teacher

    		 96 posts
    5 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now

    		 82 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts