Is positive integer n - 1 a multiple of 3?
(1) n^3 - n is a multiple of 3
(2) n^3 + 2n^2+ n is a multiple of 3
Statement 1 : n^3 - n is a multiple of 3
n(n+1)(n-1)/3 question rephrased .
So n must be multiple of 3 , therefore n =(3,6,9,12...........)
so the answer to the target question is NO. So this statement is sufficient.
OA B
Please advise and correct me if I am wrong.
n – 1 a multiple of 3
This topic has expert replies
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 510
- Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2014 2:24 am
- Thanked: 3 times
- Followed by:5 members
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Target question: Is positive integer n-1 a multiple of 3?Is positive integer n-1 a multiple of 3?
(1) n³ - n is a multiple of 3
(2) n³ + 2n² + n is a multiple of 3
Statement 1: n³ - n is a multiple of 3
Factor: n³ - n = n(n² - 1) = n(n-1)(n+1) = (n-1)(n)(n+1)
Notice that n-1, n and n+1 are three CONSECUTIVE INTEGERS.
IMPORTANT: Statement 1 is simply telling us that the product of 3 consecutive integers is divisible by 3. This is not new information. The product of ANY 3 consecutive integers will always be divisible by 3. In fact, there's a rule that says, "The product of n consecutive integers is divisible by n, n-1, n-2, . . . 2, 1"
Since statement 1 is just some rule that already exists in mathematics, we already knew this information BEFORE we even examined statement 1. So, there's no way that statement 1 could possibly add any information to help us answer the target question.
As such, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT
Statement 2: n³ + 2n²+ n is a multiple of 3
Factor: n³ + 2n² + n = n(n² + 2n + 1) = n(n+1)(n+1)
This means that EITHER n is a multiple of 3 OR n+1 is a multiple of 3.
Let's examine each possible case:
case a: If n is a multiple of 3, then we can find other multiples of 3 by adding or subtracting multiples of 3 to n. So, for example, n+3 and n+6 will be also be multiples of 3. Likewise, n-3 and n-6 will be also be multiples of 3. Since n-1 is just 1 less than n, n-1 cannot be a multiple of 3 .
case b: If n+1 is a multiple of 3, then n-1 cannot be a multiple of 3 , Since n-1 is just 2 less than n+1.
Since both possible cases yielded the same answer to the target question, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT
Answer = B
Cheers,
Brent
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 518
- Joined: Tue May 12, 2015 8:25 pm
- Thanked: 10 times