• Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep

Mooreville’s subway

This topic has 2 expert replies and 6 member replies
umeshpatil Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Joined
23 May 2012
Posted:
79 messages
Thanked:
10 times
Target GMAT Score:
800

Mooreville’s subway

Post Tue Jun 05, 2012 8:47 pm
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    Crowding on Mooreville’s subway frequently leads to delays, because it is difficult for passengers to exit from the trains. Subway ridership is projected to increase by 20 percent over the next 10 years. The Mooreville Transit Authority plans to increase the number of daily train trips by only 5 percent over the same period. Officials predict that this increase is sufficient to ensure that the incidence of delays due to crowding does not increase.

    Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest grounds for officials’ prediction?
    A. By changing maintenance schedules, the Transit Authority can achieve the 5 percent increase in train trips without purchasing any new subway cars.
    B. The Transit Authority also plans a 5 percent increase in the number of bus trips on routes that connect to subways.
    C. For most commuters who use the subway system, there is no practical alternative public transportation available.
    D. Most of the projected increase in ridership is expected to occur in off-peak hours when trains are no sparsely used.
    E. The 5 percent increase in the number of train trips can be achieved without an equal increase in Transit Authority operational costs.
    ----------------
    Premise: Crowding on Mooreville’s subway(MS) => difficult to exit from the trains=> delay in travel
    Ridership will increase by 20% in 10 years.
    Conclusion: Increase of trains by 5 % in 10 years is sufficient to avoid crowding.

    Need to find something that strengthens:
    A. Not sure if it will reduce the crowding and also it weakens the conclusion.
    B. It is just repeats the conclusion and cannot strengthen.
    C. As there is no other alternative for travel, only train route need to make efficient. So, it strengthens the conclusion. Answer.
    D. I am not sure if this supports the official’s prediction to increase the trains by 5%.
    E. This somewhat supports, but costs are not considered anywhere.

    My Answer is C. but OG has other answer. Can anyone elaborate why OA is D?

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
    Ashujain Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
    Joined
    20 Apr 2012
    Posted:
    123 messages
    Followed by:
    1 members
    Thanked:
    29 times
    Post Wed Jun 06, 2012 1:56 am
    umeshpatil wrote:
    Crowding on Mooreville’s subway frequently leads to delays, because it is difficult for passengers to exit from the trains. Subway ridership is projected to increase by 20 percent over the next 10 years. The Mooreville Transit Authority plans to increase the number of daily train trips by only 5 percent over the same period. Officials predict that this increase is sufficient to ensure that the incidence of delays due to crowding does not increase.

    Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest grounds for officials’ prediction?
    A. By changing maintenance schedules, the Transit Authority can achieve the 5 percent increase in train trips without purchasing any new subway cars.
    B. The Transit Authority also plans a 5 percent increase in the number of bus trips on routes that connect to subways.
    C. For most commuters who use the subway system, there is no practical alternative public transportation available.
    D. Most of the projected increase in ridership is expected to occur in off-peak hours when trains are no sparsely used.
    E. The 5 percent increase in the number of train trips can be achieved without an equal increase in Transit Authority operational costs.
    ----------------
    Premise: Crowding on Mooreville’s subway(MS) => difficult to exit from the trains=> delay in travel
    Ridership will increase by 20% in 10 years.
    Conclusion: Increase of trains by 5 % in 10 years is sufficient to avoid crowding.

    Need to find something that strengthens:
    A. Not sure if it will reduce the crowding and also it weakens the conclusion.
    B. It is just repeats the conclusion and cannot strengthen.
    C. As there is no other alternative for travel, only train route need to make efficient. So, it strengthens the conclusion. Answer.
    D. I am not sure if this supports the official’s prediction to increase the trains by 5%.
    E. This somewhat supports, but costs are not considered anywhere.

    My Answer is C. but OG has other answer. Can anyone elaborate why OA is D?
    If we paraphrase the question it becomes How will a 5% increase in train trips be enough for 20% increase in ridership?

    A) does not answer the question
    B) out of scope
    C) does not answer the question
    D) It says that Most of the projected increase in ridership is expected to occur in off-peak hours. 'Off-peak hours' means 'Not in the period of most frequent or heaviest use' and hence the increase will happen during a time when the ridership is not very high and hence, a 5% increase in train trips will be enough for 20% increase in ridership
    E) out of scope

    Thanked by: umeshpatil

    GMAT/MBA Expert

    Post Wed Jun 06, 2012 3:06 am
    Umeshaptil, could you explain to me in detail why you think that C is correct? Then I'll be able to give you some pointers.

    _________________
    Kasia
    Senior Instructor
    Master GMAT - the #1 rated GMAT course

    • If you found my post helpful, please click the "thank" button and/or follow me.

    • Take a 7 day free trial and find out why Economist GMAT is the highest rated GMAT course - http://gmat.economist.com/

    • Read GMAT Economist reviews - http://reviews.beatthegmat.com/economist-gmat/economist-gmat-course

    Free 7-Day Test Prep with Economist GMAT Tutor - Receive free access to the top-rated GMAT prep course including a 1-on-1 strategy session, 2 full-length tests, and 5 ask-a-tutor messages. Get started now.
    umeshpatil Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
    Joined
    23 May 2012
    Posted:
    79 messages
    Thanked:
    10 times
    Target GMAT Score:
    800
    Post Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:22 am
    Thanks Ashujain, Your explanation justifies the OG answer.

    Needgmat Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    31 May 2016
    Posted:
    234 messages
    Thanked:
    3 times
    Post Wed Nov 02, 2016 8:53 am
    Hi Verbal Experts ,

    Can you please explain why D is correct answer. I still don't understand.

    Many thanks in advance.

    Kavin

    gocoder Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    05 Dec 2015
    Posted:
    120 messages
    Target GMAT Score:
    720
    Post Sat Sep 16, 2017 8:12 am
    choice B says:
    " the Transit Authority also plans a 5 percent increase in the number of bus trips on routes that connect to subways. "

    Does this statement mean different bus trips cover along the same routes as subways do in the sense that bus stops covering the same stops like subway stops.

    if this right, shouldn't the 5% of trips along the subways should shift partial burden from the trains ?

    gocoder Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    05 Dec 2015
    Posted:
    120 messages
    Target GMAT Score:
    720
    Post Sat Sep 16, 2017 8:24 am
    choice B says:
    " the Transit Authority also plans a 5 percent increase in the number of bus trips on routes that connect to subways. "

    Does this statement mean different bus trips cover along the same routes as subways do in the sense that bus stops covering the same stops like subway stops.

    if this right, shouldn't the 5% of trips along the subways should shift partial burden from the trains ?

    Post Tue Sep 19, 2017 12:05 pm
    gocoder wrote:
    choice B says:
    " the Transit Authority also plans a 5 percent increase in the number of bus trips on routes that connect to subways. "

    Does this statement mean different bus trips cover along the same routes as subways do in the sense that bus stops covering the same stops like subway stops.

    if this right, shouldn't the 5% of trips along the subways should shift partial burden from the trains ?
    We have to take the language of the answer choice at face value. All we know is that the bus routes connect to the train routes - we don't know that they travel along similar paths. Moreover, we don't know that train commuters would use these additional bus trips as substitutes for train trips. (Isn't is possible that more bus routes connecting to train routes would lead to even more people on the train?) And even if that 5% increase in bus trips does help alleviate some of the additional burden, it still wouldn't explain why there'd be no more delays due to overcrowding, as the conclusion states.

    _________________
    Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

    Veritas Prep Reviews
    Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course

    Thanked by: gocoder
    Enroll in a Veritas Prep GMAT class completely for FREE. Wondering if a GMAT course is right for you? Attend the first class session of an actual GMAT course, either in-person or live online, and see for yourself why so many students choose to work with Veritas Prep. Find a class now!
    gocoder Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    05 Dec 2015
    Posted:
    120 messages
    Target GMAT Score:
    720
    Post Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:08 am
    DavidG@VeritasPrep wrote:
    We have to take the language of the answer choice at face value. All we know is that the bus routes connect to the train routes - we don't know that they travel along similar paths. Moreover, we don't know that train commuters would use these additional bus trips as substitutes for train trips. (Isn't is possible that more bus routes connecting to train routes would lead to even more people on the train?) And even if that 5% increase in bus trips does help alleviate some of the additional burden, it still wouldn't explain why there'd be no more delays due to overcrowding, as the conclusion states.
    Thanks for your reply. overlooked the alternative issues that could occur if the buses were in parallel paths.

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 lheiannie07 116 topics
    2 LUANDATO 62 topics
    3 swerve 62 topics
    4 ardz24 61 topics
    5 AAPL 58 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    172 posts
    2 image description Scott@TargetTestPrep

    Target Test Prep

    154 posts
    3 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

    EMPOWERgmat

    131 posts
    4 image description EconomistGMATTutor

    The Economist GMAT Tutor

    127 posts
    5 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    125 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts