| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
smclean23 Really wants to Beat The GMAT!
Joined: 23 Jun 2008 Posts: 108
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 5:13 pm Post subject: Missing something from the equation...WHAT IS IT? |
|
|
After paying a 10 percent tax on all income over $3,000, a person had a net income of $12,000. What was the income before taxes?
(A) $13,300
(B) $13,000
(C) $12,900
(D) $10,000
(E) $9,000
I backsolved and got the answer but I want to use a more structured way of getting the answer.
I tried .10(x-3000)=12000, but it seems like I'm missing something from this equation. What is it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
dbart06 Rising GMAT Star
Joined: 22 Jun 2008 Posts: 75
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 1 times in 1 posts
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
smclean23,
I too got lost in the formula. I discovered that the formula should read:
x-.1(x-3000)=12000
you set up the equation to find the income that was taxed but you have to subtract that number from x.
hope it helps. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
smclean23 Really wants to Beat The GMAT!
Joined: 23 Jun 2008 Posts: 108
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 5:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| thanks...makes more sense now... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
smclean23 Really wants to Beat The GMAT!
Joined: 23 Jun 2008 Posts: 108
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 5:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Actually, I tried the formula and it doesnt give me 13,000......Do you? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dbart06 Rising GMAT Star
Joined: 22 Jun 2008 Posts: 75
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 1 times in 1 posts
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 7:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
x-.1(x-300)=12000
you have -.1 times x and -.1 times -300, this make 300 a positive # and then you subtract that from both sides..it gives an equation:
x-.1x=11700 => .9x=11700
x=13000 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
dbart06 Rising GMAT Star
Joined: 22 Jun 2008 Posts: 75
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 1 times in 1 posts
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
x-.1(x-300)=12000
you have -.1 times x and -.1 times -300, this make 300 a positive # and then you subtract that from both sides..it gives an equation:
x-.1x=11700 => .9x=11700
x=13000 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
beeparoo Really wants to Beat The GMAT!

Joined: 17 Jun 2007 Posts: 200
Thanks given: 7 Thanked 8 times in 8 posts
Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 11:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| dbart06 wrote: | x-.1(x-300)=12000
you have -.1 times x and -.1 times -300, this make 300 a positive # and then you subtract that from both sides..it gives an equation:
x-.1x=11700 => .9x=11700
x=13000 |
But your equation has a minor error: You subtracted 300 when you were supposed to subtract 3000. This will change your answer... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dbart06 Rising GMAT Star
Joined: 22 Jun 2008 Posts: 75
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 1 times in 1 posts
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 11:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
sorry for the typo should be:
x-.1(x-3000)=12000
thanks beeparoo. these are the mistakes that cost me on the test. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dbart06 Rising GMAT Star
Joined: 22 Jun 2008 Posts: 75
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 1 times in 1 posts
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 11:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
sorry for the typo should be:
x-.1(x-3000)=12000
thanks beeparoo. these are the mistakes that cost me on the test. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lion147 Rising GMAT Star
Joined: 06 Jul 2008 Posts: 45
Thanks given: 4 Thanked 6 times in 6 posts
Location: Florida GMAT Score: 710
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 6:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think an easier equation is:
3000+0.9x = 12000
Where x is the taxable income, the answer is 3000+x.
i.e. 0.9x = 9000, x = 9000/0.9, x = 10000, answer is 10000+3000. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
senthil Really wants to Beat The GMAT!
Joined: 23 Dec 2007 Posts: 145
Thanks given: 1 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
Location: Chennai,INDIA
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I tried the same way as lioner has done , that is the easiest approach too |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|